Avatar feed
Responses: 4
Sgt Self Employed
4
4
0
The SAW was a great piece of gear. I'll take any they don't want.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Dale Johnson
3
3
0
Sig Sauer is a very good quality manufacturer and I think the change to the 6.8mm round is a good one. From reading it is a very stable round but will carry kinetic energy better downrange. Then again everyone has an opinion, time will tell.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Retired
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
I'd like to take that round to the range.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Dale Johnson
MSgt Dale Johnson
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) - Me too, it is supposed to be a more accurate round.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Roy Cheever
2
2
0
Will all of NATO want to switch to 6.8 mm?
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Retired
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
I think the ammunition policy has outlived its usefulness. In the 1950s, when it was adopted, it probably made good economic and logistical sense, but even then, not all weapons of NATO countries used the same ammunition. The US used the M1911 until the mid 80s.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG Roy Cheever
MSG Roy Cheever
>1 y
Something else I thought of after my comment as well. I was told as we were transitioning to 5.56mm very early in my career, that they found a lot of Charlie’s and Cong were using our 7.6mm. As they could chamber our 7.62mm but we couldn’t chamber theirs, as their rounds were slightly longer. SFC (Join to see)
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Retired
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
MSG Roy Cheever - Yeah, we heard the same thing with the 81mm mortars. The Soviet 82mm would fire ours but we couldn't fire theirs, so the new 81mm rounds had a "floating" primer to help mitigate that capability. I don't know how much truth is in that.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close