Posted on Jan 26, 2021
Twitter permanently suspends MyPillow CEO for election misinformation
1.54K
17
8
6
6
0
"Twitter has permanently suspended the account of MyPillow chief Mike Lindell for repeated violations of the company's policy on election misinformation, the social media firm said late on Monday."
Twitter permanently suspends MyPillow CEO for election misinformation
Posted from nbcnews.com
Election 2020
Business
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
2
2
0
Violate the TOS and you can get the boot. After all it us a Private Company. Just wondering why Republicans are getting their panties in a wad over a Private Companys actions after being a supporter and defender of private companies and their choices.
(2)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
A1C Michael Allen If that was true they would have been banned after their first post but that did not happen. It took an attempted coup, the murder of a police officer andcother deaths before they felt obliged to enforce their own rules. What's amazing us people like yourself blame bias against you for your own actions and do not feel that you should be accountable for your actions.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
1
1
0
"Courts have rejected such baseless claims, even as Trump and his supporters continued to falsely allege there being voter fraud."
It is my understanding the claims are not baseless. If a court refuses to hear a case based on merit, without hearing the case information on their claims there is no documentation. Stiff arming?
I don't know. But, nbcnews is questionable as they lean way left. In this case the above quote reads baseless claims. From what I read, that is not a correct form to state the allegations.
Misinformation. Is twitter being honest? I read they sent a butt load of money to Biden.
I noticed this info. I do not know if it is true either.
https://www.wnd.com/2021/01/judge-says-state-plan-allowing-ballots-without-postmark-illegal/
It is my understanding the claims are not baseless. If a court refuses to hear a case based on merit, without hearing the case information on their claims there is no documentation. Stiff arming?
I don't know. But, nbcnews is questionable as they lean way left. In this case the above quote reads baseless claims. From what I read, that is not a correct form to state the allegations.
Misinformation. Is twitter being honest? I read they sent a butt load of money to Biden.
I noticed this info. I do not know if it is true either.
https://www.wnd.com/2021/01/judge-says-state-plan-allowing-ballots-without-postmark-illegal/
Judge says state plan allowing ballots without postmark was illegal
The Virginia Board of Elections rule allowing officials to count ballots that arrived without a postmark up to three days after the election was illegal, a state judge ruled.
(1)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
What a load of crap article. The link to the supposed Virginia law takes you to an article on a proposal in California, not the Virginia statute. Second, whoever wrote the article misstated what happened. It was a consent decree, which both parties agreed to, not a finding by a judge of misconduct on one side. Second, the initial order not to accept those ballots was in place weeks before the election, meaning that those ballots were not counted, and would not have affected the results.
In other words, using this case as an example of fraud would be a baseless claim, based on actually reading the court documents.
And the plaintiffs didn't even win attorney fees...
In other words, using this case as an example of fraud would be a baseless claim, based on actually reading the court documents.
And the plaintiffs didn't even win attorney fees...
(2)
(0)
Cpl Mark A. Morris
Capt Gregory Prickett - I cclicked on it again. It reads Virginia. I do not see anything about CA. Are you using psyops?
(0)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Cpl Mark A. Morris - in the article, the link in the sentence "Virginia Circuit Court Judge William Eldridge ruled the state’s late mail-in ballot law violated state statute" at mail-in ballot law leads to an article on a proposal in California, in the Daily Caller, titled "Pelosi Touts $3.6 Billion Mail-In Voting Proposal, Calls It ‘Voting At Home’"
Please explain to me why an article on a consent decree in Virginia is linked to an article about California. Did you not check the internal links of the article you posted?
Please explain to me why an article on a consent decree in Virginia is linked to an article about California. Did you not check the internal links of the article you posted?
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google