Posted on Dec 2, 2020
Presidential Transition Highlights: Justice Dept. Has No Evidence of Fraud That Would Undo Biden’...
801
14
8
4
4
0
What will it take to get people to believe facts and not speculation?
Presidential Transition Highlights: Justice Dept. Has No Evidence of Fraud That Would Undo Biden’...
Posted from nytimes.comPosted in these groups: 
Election 2020
Donald Trump
Election 2020 Donald Trump
Posted 4 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
The problem is when faced with facts many tend to disbelieve them even in teh face of mountains of proof about the fraud. When and if it all comes out the house of cards will fall.
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
What fraud? What Proof? What evidence? Trumps lawyers never alleged fraud in a single court filing. Why? They have no evidence of it.
(3)
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
SGT (Join to see) - Re-Read my post and you will have your answer. I am guessing you selective hearing tuned out electoral FRAUD, Voter FRAUD etc.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
1SG Dennis Hicks And yet not a shred of evidence has been presented in 30+ court challenges. And in each case the Judged asked Trumps lawyers if they were alleging fraud and in every case Trumps lawyers said; NO. At some point you are going to have to stop living this delusion.
I highly suggest that you should learn the process. Start with running for precinct chair in your local election or get yourself appointed. Learn the process. Run for office. I guarantee you will learn a lot about the process even if you lose.
I highly suggest that you should learn the process. Start with running for precinct chair in your local election or get yourself appointed. Learn the process. Run for office. I guarantee you will learn a lot about the process even if you lose.
(1)
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
I think your projection and you information supply are polluted, lets see whats happens down the line one way of the other, My post still explains it perfectly. Yeah no on running for office to many criminals in there, I prefer to watch them as they steal, lie and fool sheep into believing everything that comes out of their mouths, have fun.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
The wording is always careful, with enough of a caveat that it is true. The wording is NOT "There is no evidence of fraud." It includes the caveat that the fraud must be sufficient to overturn the election. It represents that, while widespread fraud may have taken place, we have not YET proven sufficient QUANTITY of fraud to overturn the election. That also does not mean there isn't more fraud to be discovered. There hasn't been a special investigation into the fraud, so it is likely that some instances of fraud have not yet been found.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
No fraud has been proven. No evidence of fraud has been presented to a court.
Now here is the biggie.. Trumps lawyers have not alleged fraud in a single court filing. Not a single one. Now ask yourself why. Lack of evidence?
Now here is the biggie.. Trumps lawyers have not alleged fraud in a single court filing. Not a single one. Now ask yourself why. Lack of evidence?
(5)
(0)
CPO (Join to see)
Pretty hard to prove a negative in this instance if the side that's doing the accusing doesn't respect facts. There's a reason why essentially all of these cases have been ruling in one direction across all levels of the legal system.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google