Responses: 7
Absolutely unconstitutional because it bars those who can't afford the insurance from exercising the right to keep and bear arms.
(7)
(0)
SFC Jim Ruether
Hey Cpl McMiller I don't see these legislators really carryabout gun rights. I think they are just throwing #$% at the wall to see if anything sticks?
(3)
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
SFC Jim Ruether - They're just dumb asses who have never read the Constitution and aren't intelligent enough to understand it if they did.
(2)
(0)
A right has to be insured? What should the insurance be for free speech???
(7)
(0)
SPC John Smith
The premium should be high enough that, as a risk pool, physical damage to persons or property, which is caused by the named peril, can be fully indemnified. $0.00 should cover it.
(2)
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
Only rights that make others feel all triggered and pouty. They would tax air if they could.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next