Avatar feed
Responses: 7
Cpl Mark McMiller
7
7
0
Absolutely unconstitutional because it bars those who can't afford the insurance from exercising the right to keep and bear arms.
(7)
Comment
(0)
SFC Jim Ruether
SFC Jim Ruether
5 y
Hey Cpl McMiller I don't see these legislators really carryabout gun rights. I think they are just throwing #$% at the wall to see if anything sticks?
(3)
Reply
(0)
SPC John Smith
SPC John Smith
5 y
Sort of like making anyone who votes present a govt' ID.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
5 y
SFC Jim Ruether - They're just dumb asses who have never read the Constitution and aren't intelligent enough to understand it if they did.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt William Quinn
7
7
0
A right has to be insured? What should the insurance be for free speech???
(7)
Comment
(0)
SPC John Smith
SPC John Smith
5 y
The premium should be high enough that, as a risk pool, physical damage to persons or property, which is caused by the named peril, can be fully indemnified. $0.00 should cover it.
(2)
Reply
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
1SG Dennis Hicks
5 y
Only rights that make others feel all triggered and pouty. They would tax air if they could.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Jeff N.
6
6
0
Another infringement on a right that shall not be infringed.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close