Posted on Jun 11, 2019
Supreme Court refuses to consider whether Second Amendment protects gun silencers
1.59K
34
5
12
12
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
As with bump stocks, suppressors are not necessary for defensive purposes, thus I see why the supremes are not taking the case. Please don't misunderstand, I would love to see suppressors legalized, to help with combating hearing loss. Unfortunately, the non shooting public see suppressors used by Hollywood as almost noiseless, which in reality is not accurate.
(4)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
You beat me to it. Yes, public opinion is based too often on who shouts the loudest and not knowledge
(2)
(0)
Not too surprised, because there are still a couple of rank-liberals and some of the other Justices are only pseudo-moderates. If the Supreme Court considered every 2nd Amendment case that comes before it, they wouldn't get anything else done.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next