Posted on May 1, 2019
Work Hard, Play By The Rules, And Be Hated By Liberals
1.19K
46
27
12
12
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
They despise people who follow the rules and are successful. That means the rules actually work and they want to toss them and use any other means to get what they want.
(4)
(0)
Wow! That's a paranoid op-ed. Poor boy, those mean old liberals are out to get him,,,,, NOT!
(3)
(0)
SGT (Join to see) From the article: "Not that of some pack of randos that constitutes a key Democrat demo. Not that of a sub-set of a sub-set of leftist-loving weirdos or of a constituency of greedy lay-abouts looking for further succor from Uncle Sucker. Not that of those dwelling at the farthest fringes of the acronyms/symbols/punctuation marks of the LGBTQZ4x&F#V™@!y£ü spectrum."
Yeah, completely unbiased assessment of the situation here.
Also, articles like this are the reason that the country is divided and will continue to be divided.
If we want to be good, we have to act good. If we want be GREAT, we have to act great. Right now, we are doing neither. And yes, the other side does it too. And? Has that argument EVER worked for deciding what is right and wrong? Did it work when we were 10 years old? Did it work in middle-school? "Well, HE did it first!" No. It doesn't hold water because it's an abdication of personal responsibility. You want more personal liberty? Be responsible for your actions.
Side note, the United States hasn't been a beacon of individual liberty for decades. We're #17 for human freedom in the world. #17. We have a long way to go.
Yeah, completely unbiased assessment of the situation here.
Also, articles like this are the reason that the country is divided and will continue to be divided.
If we want to be good, we have to act good. If we want be GREAT, we have to act great. Right now, we are doing neither. And yes, the other side does it too. And? Has that argument EVER worked for deciding what is right and wrong? Did it work when we were 10 years old? Did it work in middle-school? "Well, HE did it first!" No. It doesn't hold water because it's an abdication of personal responsibility. You want more personal liberty? Be responsible for your actions.
Side note, the United States hasn't been a beacon of individual liberty for decades. We're #17 for human freedom in the world. #17. We have a long way to go.
(3)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
I could go on through this article, but it's so full of hate and vitreol that it's just not worth any more time. I'm ashamed that people on this site, a site of "professionals", promote, agree with and advocate this kind of hate. Lt Col Charlie Brown CW5 Jack Cardwell Col Joseph Lenertz
(3)
(0)
Col Joseph Lenertz
MAJ Bryan Zeski - No one advocates for hate. I want it to end. You may be ashamed, it is your right. But don't try to tell me I'm advocating for hate. I see it and recognize it and want it to end.
(0)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
Col Joseph Lenertz -
This doesn't sound like it's promoting hate and derision?
"the leftist objective is your enslavement (meaning your utter obedience to the ruling class and the total forfeiture of your right to participate in your own governance) and/or your death (whether through the fine grinding of time, fellow boomers, or through more proactive means on softball fields and elsewhere – it’s all good as long as you’re gone."
"What do Democrats offer you, and the people like you, who work hard and play by the rules? Nothing, except hate and the demand that you give up even more of what’s yours so the lib elite can buy votes by redistributing it to people who didn’t earn it and don’t deserve it."
"Big Chief Warren, Crusty Commie Curmudgeon and several others want to give away “free college.”"
"Creepy Joe’s entire campaign rationale is that the half of America that refused to vote for Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit is racist"
"Pete Buttiwhatever, who you might have heard was gay and whose father might have been a mailman (maybe I am confusing him with another Rust Belt dork – they all blend together)"
If you promote this viewpoint and method of delivery, then, yes, YOU are advocating and promoting hate.
I know its been a year, apparently, but now I'm thinking this article might need another, more thorough, review and dissection.
This doesn't sound like it's promoting hate and derision?
"the leftist objective is your enslavement (meaning your utter obedience to the ruling class and the total forfeiture of your right to participate in your own governance) and/or your death (whether through the fine grinding of time, fellow boomers, or through more proactive means on softball fields and elsewhere – it’s all good as long as you’re gone."
"What do Democrats offer you, and the people like you, who work hard and play by the rules? Nothing, except hate and the demand that you give up even more of what’s yours so the lib elite can buy votes by redistributing it to people who didn’t earn it and don’t deserve it."
"Big Chief Warren, Crusty Commie Curmudgeon and several others want to give away “free college.”"
"Creepy Joe’s entire campaign rationale is that the half of America that refused to vote for Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit is racist"
"Pete Buttiwhatever, who you might have heard was gay and whose father might have been a mailman (maybe I am confusing him with another Rust Belt dork – they all blend together)"
If you promote this viewpoint and method of delivery, then, yes, YOU are advocating and promoting hate.
I know its been a year, apparently, but now I'm thinking this article might need another, more thorough, review and dissection.
(1)
(0)
Col Joseph Lenertz
MAJ Bryan Zeski - You made a claim about ME personally. Not the article. "I'm ashamed that people on this site, a site of "professionals", promote, agree with and advocate this kind of hate." I'm letting you know that I do not advocate for hate. But I recognize hate when I see it. They are different things. You claim that I advocated hate, which is insulting and wrong.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next