Posted on Jan 19, 2015
Petition forces White House response for imprisoned LT
5.55K
31
9
1
1
0
1LT Lorance Petition Reaches the White House; Should the White House be Involved?
So, public support of 1LT Lorance has reached the point of getting the White House involved in the conviction of 1LT Lorance. Is this right? Where are all the other petitions for convicted service members?
I don't know any more of the details than what I have read surrounding the conviction of this LT and I would guess the public supporters don't either. Whether we agree with the conviction or not, there was a trial and he was convicted based on the evidience presented. So, why are these supporters putting the POTUS and the White House in a bad position? Either way I see it, whatever decision the POTUS makes, there will be continued outcry regarding the incident.
So, public support of 1LT Lorance has reached the point of getting the White House involved in the conviction of 1LT Lorance. Is this right? Where are all the other petitions for convicted service members?
I don't know any more of the details than what I have read surrounding the conviction of this LT and I would guess the public supporters don't either. Whether we agree with the conviction or not, there was a trial and he was convicted based on the evidience presented. So, why are these supporters putting the POTUS and the White House in a bad position? Either way I see it, whatever decision the POTUS makes, there will be continued outcry regarding the incident.
Petition forces White House response for imprisoned LT
Posted from armytimes.comPosted in these groups: 
White House
White House
Edited 10 y ago
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 5
5
5
0
The White House offers this process "to allow individuals to petition the administration to take action on a range of issues." It's their right (our right) to do this, so I don't see a problem with people exercising their rights. Seems like 1LT Lorance's supporters feel very strongly that he was wrongly accused and convicted, so they're asking the White House to intervene.
I see your point, LTC (Join to see), about the petition putting the White House in a tough position, but I'll bet a lot of the petitions at "We the people" are controversial.
When I first read about 1LT Lorance's story, I thought that he was wrongfully accused, that he was just doing his job. But after reading about the testimony of the people who were right there and working for him, I changed my mind. According to them, he was a bit of a loose cannon.
I see your point, LTC (Join to see), about the petition putting the White House in a tough position, but I'll bet a lot of the petitions at "We the people" are controversial.
When I first read about 1LT Lorance's story, I thought that he was wrongfully accused, that he was just doing his job. But after reading about the testimony of the people who were right there and working for him, I changed my mind. According to them, he was a bit of a loose cannon.
(5)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
I believe POTUS will only pay it lip service and move on. It's a shame that this has happened, however, there are two sides to every story. Recently his platoon has even spoken out against him.
(2)
(0)
3
3
0
No, I don't think the WH should get involved. this is a criminal matter. We have a court-martial process and appeals process. Once due process, thru the system have been conducted, Carry out the punishment
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
I don't understand many of these petitions, but agree that no matter what, outcry will continue.
(2)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
@LTC J Keith P Yes Sir, I don't really understand them either, but unfortunate that the POTUS will have to direct his attention away from something that could possibly affect the whole country. Kinda like the congressionals we get!
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see), I have welcomed and embraced each and every IG, Congressional, Presidential and First Lady inquiry I have received!
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) Sir, I didn't know the First Lady could request an inquiry as well....how about that!
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google