6
6
0
A look at things from the Left side of the fence. The author gives no citations for his stats. He may have pulled them out of a$$ for all I know. Some of his assumptions are dead wrong, as you'll see. But the sheep don't care, they just want something they can point to as they make their ridiculous claims.
Why banning handguns makes sense
Posted from bangordailynews.com
Self Defense
2nd Amendment
Firearms and Guns
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 6
5
5
0
5
5
0
Just because it is printed or on the internet, does not make it true except for sheeple.
(5)
(0)
4
4
0
The professor should stick to engineering. Clearly he lacks the ability to make logical arguments.
He claims, "It is simply recognition of the fact that constitutional “rights” are not absolute. No private citizen should have a constitutional right to own weaponry that is specifically designed for killing people and is used to cause many senseless deaths each year. Banning the private ownership of handguns is very much analogues to making it a crime to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater. They are both common sense limitations on certain constitutional rights."
Arms were and are specifically designed for killing, when the Constitution was written, and now.
He claims, "It is simply recognition of the fact that constitutional “rights” are not absolute. No private citizen should have a constitutional right to own weaponry that is specifically designed for killing people and is used to cause many senseless deaths each year. Banning the private ownership of handguns is very much analogues to making it a crime to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater. They are both common sense limitations on certain constitutional rights."
Arms were and are specifically designed for killing, when the Constitution was written, and now.
(4)
(0)
SMSgt David Lawrence
So he is saying that ownership of an inanimate object is "the same as" the action of creating panic in a crowded theater. What a TOOL!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google