Posted on Sep 14, 2018
Feinstein asks FBI to review letter involving Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
1.67K
47
18
8
8
0
The desperation is incredible!
So apparently the letter was given to Feinstein by a Representative, who got it from a college professor who wrote about events involving someone else's events that allegedly happened decades ago...Wow! Really?
So apparently the letter was given to Feinstein by a Representative, who got it from a college professor who wrote about events involving someone else's events that allegedly happened decades ago...Wow! Really?
Feinstein asks FBI to review letter involving Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
Posted from latimes.comPosted in these groups: 
Supreme Court
Congress
Office of the President (POTUS)
New Politics
Conservative
Supreme Court Congress Office of the President (POTUS) New Politics Conservative
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 12
5
5
0
This is the 11th hour surprise. After the democrats are sure they cannot stop Kavanagh with the vote, they try character assassination and delay with anonymous allegations from high school. This is similar to the stunt pulled on Clarence Thomas. It is desperate, partisan, dishonest and frankly BS.
Why, if the accuser didn't want this to go forward, and dear Diane said she would honor that, did she turn it over to the FBI? Why the FBI and not the local law enforcement people where the events allegedly happened 35 years ago? Will a charge be filed? Sounds like none will. So what then? Nothing is the answer.
This is a hail Mary effort by the democrats to delay the vote until after the election. I hope the Republicans on the committee have the vote this month as planned and shove it up the dems rear end. There is no need to do to this to a judge, who from all corners, is viewed to be fair and impartial and attempts to interpret law, not make it. He is well qualified and above reproach and the democrats try to butcher his reputation. What a farce.
Why, if the accuser didn't want this to go forward, and dear Diane said she would honor that, did she turn it over to the FBI? Why the FBI and not the local law enforcement people where the events allegedly happened 35 years ago? Will a charge be filed? Sounds like none will. So what then? Nothing is the answer.
This is a hail Mary effort by the democrats to delay the vote until after the election. I hope the Republicans on the committee have the vote this month as planned and shove it up the dems rear end. There is no need to do to this to a judge, who from all corners, is viewed to be fair and impartial and attempts to interpret law, not make it. He is well qualified and above reproach and the democrats try to butcher his reputation. What a farce.
(5)
(0)
(2)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
MSgt Steve Sweeney - If you listen to the opinions of those on the courts he has worked with and around, that is their opinion. If you listen to the talking heads and politicians who are afraid Roe V Wade will go away, he is evil incarnate. I listen to the people that know him the best.
Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg has come out and spoken about his circus the democrats have made of this. It is a national embarrassment. I am sure you support the circus.
Can you tell me which of his decisions on the court you really have issues with without going in the web and looking for one? I doubt it.
Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg has come out and spoken about his circus the democrats have made of this. It is a national embarrassment. I am sure you support the circus.
Can you tell me which of his decisions on the court you really have issues with without going in the web and looking for one? I doubt it.
(2)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Do you have any facts to back up your accusation? I didn't think so but nice attemp at character assassination.
I support an open hearing with honest, fair questioning not the circus the democrats and their paid protestors have made this. Trump has the full authority to make the pick and the Senate leaders have the full authority to have the hearings now. You don't like that do you? Like your hero Obama said, elections have consequences, suck it up.
BTW the person the president nominates does not have to be on the list. That is another misdirection. He can nominate anyone he likes, period. Your side lost this one and you aren't happy, I get it.
I support an open hearing with honest, fair questioning not the circus the democrats and their paid protestors have made this. Trump has the full authority to make the pick and the Senate leaders have the full authority to have the hearings now. You don't like that do you? Like your hero Obama said, elections have consequences, suck it up.
BTW the person the president nominates does not have to be on the list. That is another misdirection. He can nominate anyone he likes, period. Your side lost this one and you aren't happy, I get it.
(2)
(0)
4
4
0
After November, there are inevitably going to be blue seats in Congress... but I really hope a vast majority of them stay/turn red come November. These people, if you can really call them that at this point, are nothing but selfish and evil. They don't have anyone's best interest at heart but their own.
(4)
(0)
3
3
0
I read elsewhere that this accusation is over something that happened when he was in high school. Really?
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google