Avatar feed
Responses: 8
SSG Jessica Bautista
3
3
0
Oh, he's angry. The only people who are afraid of being ratted out are the ones who know that they did something worth ratting about.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Gary Andrews
SSgt Gary Andrews
>1 y
Exactly. You can't "rat" on somebody that hasn't done anything. But he knows everything he's done......so he is plenty worried, as day by day and piece by piece, the puzzle is being put together. It will all be clear before much longer.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Jessica Bautista
SSG Jessica Bautista
>1 y
SSgt Gary Andrews Nowadays, it's easier to let the news flow while his supporters flail without a liberal to lash at. Midterms are coming... Fa la la la la...
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Maj John Bell
3
3
0
I am not saying this is the case now but I have always been leery of the idea of testimony given as a condition of a deal. I would hope that there is a requirement for corroborating evidence, or corroborating testimony from a witness with no threat of prosecution over their head. I also believe that a jury should be told of any testimony given as a condition of a deal. That may already exist.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
>1 y
There is not. It’s a standard LE tactic to extort a witness by threatening the family and friends. That is what Judge Ellis referred to as composing. A legal form of extortion.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MCPO Roger Collins
1
1
0
Far better to get the FBI give you an assist and immunity to testify, like they did Hillary. Much better system, for the chosen, unless they lose the election.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close