Posted on Aug 13, 2018
White House Takes Aim At Financial Protections For Military
2.43K
37
17
6
6
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
When it comes to anything Obama even remotely wanted or did, it’s a write off even if he didn’t support it directly. Look at who is pushing this, then look at Mulvaneys own actions in the past. He’s pro-business and nothing comes before that fact. He just happens to work for a President who is also pro-business and there is where this becomes a natural progression. In the end, we have folks who haven’t served a day in uniform telling those who are the “best way forward”. I’d hope SECDEF rolls through and checks this (he hasn’t forgotten where he come from), I’d hope Kellly would do the same as both a former NCO and as an officer. I’d hope that all these military “suooprt” orgs come out against this (IAVA, American Legion, VFW, are you listening), and put a substantial effort into stopping this. In the end there are two certainties, it’s going to come upon troops and their commands to help them make good and sounds decisions, and us, to be good stewards in making sure the past doesn’t make the same mistakes we did.
If one truly believes his oath has no expiration date, then something like this should be something that makes you think. Not on party politics, but helping the troops as a whole.
If one truly believes his oath has no expiration date, then something like this should be something that makes you think. Not on party politics, but helping the troops as a whole.
(3)
(0)
Let me guess its a law that Obama had put into place. Trump is an evil corporate whore that claims to be for the military but his actions show otherwise
(1)
(0)
Read This Next