Posted on Mar 9, 2018
Republican Jewish Coalition demands resignation of Democratic leaders with ties to Farrakhan
1.04K
14
11
3
3
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
Did Farrakhan ever run for office on the Democratic ticket? Those ties are that seven Democrats have at some point attended meetings at which Farrakhan was also present.
What about Republicans with ties to David Duke who was an elected Republican Louisiana State Representative or Arthur Jones who is set to set to win a Chicago area GOP Congressional District primary. https://worldisraelnews.com/holocaust-denier-anti-semite-set-claim-gop-nomination-congressional-race/ or even Pat Buchanan? https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2015/04/29/pat-buchanan-pens-exclusive-anti-semitic-publication
Both parties have affiliations with a host unsavory individuals, the Republican Jewish Coalition should focus on pulling the log out of their own eye before they try to pull a mote from the eyes of Democrats. I suspect that if every Republican who ever attended a meeting with an anti-Semite were forced to resign, the number would be far larger than 7.
What about Republicans with ties to David Duke who was an elected Republican Louisiana State Representative or Arthur Jones who is set to set to win a Chicago area GOP Congressional District primary. https://worldisraelnews.com/holocaust-denier-anti-semite-set-claim-gop-nomination-congressional-race/ or even Pat Buchanan? https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2015/04/29/pat-buchanan-pens-exclusive-anti-semitic-publication
Both parties have affiliations with a host unsavory individuals, the Republican Jewish Coalition should focus on pulling the log out of their own eye before they try to pull a mote from the eyes of Democrats. I suspect that if every Republican who ever attended a meeting with an anti-Semite were forced to resign, the number would be far larger than 7.
Holocaust denier and anti-Semite set to win Republican congressional race
Outspoken Holocaust denier Arthur Jones is set to win a Chicago area GOP Congressional District primary, by default.
(2)
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
Stop making sense. This is another one of those "gotta have it my way and when the other is equally as wrong and it's logically pointed out, I have nothing". Both of the links used in any retort are the same link, with no debate.
(1)
(0)
How can he be anti-Semitic when he is a Muslim - most Muslims speak a Semitic language - to be anti-Semitic would mean that he would have to be against all Semitic speaking people.
Semitic languages, languages that form a branch of the Afro-Asiatic language phylum. Members of the Semitic group are spread throughout North Africa and Southwest Asia and have played preeminent roles in the linguistic and cultural landscape of the Middle East for more than 4,000 years. In the early 21st century the most important Semitic language, in terms of the number of speakers, was ARABIC. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Most of Northern Africa speak a Semitic language: The most widely spoken Semitic languages today are Arabic, Amharic, Tigrinya, Hebrew, Tigre, Aramaic and Maltese. So in actuality he would have to be against all of these people to be truly considered anti-Semitic.
Now, you can say he is anti-Jew and possibly be correct.
Anti-Semitism, hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. The term anti-Semitism was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns under way in central Europe at that time. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
So even though the Jewish religion had been around for thousands of years and probably was discriminated against just like every other religion on the planet at one time or another it wasn't until 1879 that someone coined the phase anti-Semitism and decided to associate it with the Jewish religion - never mind all the other Semitic speaking people that have been around for thousands of years.
Make no mistake Judaism (being a Jew) is a Religion just like Christianity and Islam and Buddhism, etc..
Semitic languages, languages that form a branch of the Afro-Asiatic language phylum. Members of the Semitic group are spread throughout North Africa and Southwest Asia and have played preeminent roles in the linguistic and cultural landscape of the Middle East for more than 4,000 years. In the early 21st century the most important Semitic language, in terms of the number of speakers, was ARABIC. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
Most of Northern Africa speak a Semitic language: The most widely spoken Semitic languages today are Arabic, Amharic, Tigrinya, Hebrew, Tigre, Aramaic and Maltese. So in actuality he would have to be against all of these people to be truly considered anti-Semitic.
Now, you can say he is anti-Jew and possibly be correct.
Anti-Semitism, hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. The term anti-Semitism was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns under way in central Europe at that time. (Encyclopedia Britannica)
So even though the Jewish religion had been around for thousands of years and probably was discriminated against just like every other religion on the planet at one time or another it wasn't until 1879 that someone coined the phase anti-Semitism and decided to associate it with the Jewish religion - never mind all the other Semitic speaking people that have been around for thousands of years.
Make no mistake Judaism (being a Jew) is a Religion just like Christianity and Islam and Buddhism, etc..
(2)
(0)
LTC Orlando Illi
Thank you for that distinction. Regarding his STATED opinion of Judaism:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/minister-louis-farrakhan-in-his-own-words
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/minister-louis-farrakhan-in-his-own-words
Minister Louis Farrakhan - In His Own Words
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.
(0)
(0)
Challenge accepted. He has the right to free speech as anyone else. He has never been linked, accused, or sentenced for anything he said where others who were got away Scott free. When he commits a crime, then we can talk. Where are the resignations of those republicans who support openly or covertly white nationalism, NEO Nazis, or other groups who have said equally bad or worse about Jews? I only said Republicans because the article makes it political. Dems are no better. Don’t see Faux beating the drums to have the WH resign over comments made that are racist at worst, ignorant at best.
(1)
(0)
LTC Orlando Illi
SSG Swan; Yes Farrakhan has a right to free speech guaranteed by the 1st Amendment. It also apparent by your response, that you believe that he also has a right, under the 1st Amendment, to advocate for white and Jewish Genocide - which he has done on numerous occasions. You have a right to your opinion SSG. I happen to disagree with it.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/minister-louis-farrakhan-in-his-own-words
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/minister-louis-farrakhan-in-his-own-words
Minister Louis Farrakhan - In His Own Words
Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.
(0)
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
1A guarantee's the right to say whatever you want, not protect you from the repercussions of said speech. THAT I agree with. Now again the article paints a political picture with one side making it seem they have the moral high ground. In my response, I said how the republicans didn't shy away from extremist groups unless they were black or Muslim. White extremist groups have called on the very thing Faux is hammering the Dems on. Where was this fake outrage then? I could easily list a few that have done it recently. Did the republicans request for their members to resign? How about the Clive Bundy fiasco? Let a minority point a rifle from a concealed position at a cop.....it was done in Dallas and unfortunately a cop died. So did the fool who did it. How many folks from Bundy's group did it and died? Not one. How many were taken to jail? Not one. How many convicted? Not one, YET there is photographic evidence of it happening. You can't get Ryan or McConnell to say anything wrong against anything (as if Schumer and Pelosi are any better). Faux cannot throw stones at democrats "supporting' Farrakhan when they have been complicit in the actions of home grown extremist groups.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next