Avatar feed
Responses: 8
CPT Jack Durish
8
8
0
Edited >1 y ago
How about their birth certificates? (And yes, I'm intentionally ignoring the underlying question of what authority a state has to enforce such a requirement on a candidate for a federal office. I'm simply glad that I am FROM Maryland, my natal state, the state from which I enlisted and never returned)
(8)
Comment
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
CPT Jack Durish
>1 y
MAJ Bryan Zeski - God try. However the Constitution establishes the qualifications for President. I know that there are people who want to rewrite or reinterpret the Constitution, and you may be among them, but I'm sworn to preserve, protect and defend it, and it was written in very plain language. No legalese. Just plain language.

"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States."

It's a real stretch to infer that any part of that requires that the President have an income of any amount or account for it
(3)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
>1 y
CPT Jack Durish - People don't have to have an income to have tax returns. No part of the Constitution prevents a state from having additional requirements. The Constitution has no provisions mandating that only those requirements are allowed. The Constitution continually has been shown to be a document intended to restrict the Federal government and empower the States and the people.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
SSgt Christopher Brose
>1 y
MAJ Bryan Zeski - "No part of the Constitution prevents a state from having additional requirements." The states don't have the authority to arbitrarily add qualifications without amending the Constitution.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
>1 y
SSgt Christopher Brose - It's not a qualification though - I guess that's the point. It's just a filing requirement. Nothing in the Constitution says that candidates must pay a fee to file - and yet, they still have to every State. A qualification would be something you are or have (age and nationality for example) - a requirement is something you do - pay a fee or release your taxes.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Don Gulizia
6
6
0
How about we require all politician (prior to running for office) apply and qualify for a security clearance? NACLC for local/county (mayor/etc), SSBI for state office (state assby/U.S. Rep), and Full Scope Poly for national level & governor (Pres, Senator, Gov.) That way, you don't get to see my tax returns, birth certificate, DD-214, college transcripts, etc...but you know that I have done no wrong-doing in my life (or at least, not bad enough to prevent me from obtaining a security clearance). I'm pretty sure the two choices we had for the last election (yes, I know there were more...but not really) would have been disqualified.
(6)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Don Gulizia
PO1 Don Gulizia
>1 y
LCpl Shane Couch - Not sure she would have made it through the poly when they started asking about the private server.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LCpl Shane Couch
LCpl Shane Couch
>1 y
PO1 Don Gulizia - This could be true. But she could pass it if she believes her own bs enough, right? Most likely she would have either been given preferential treatment of her findings might have been changed/faked in order for her to pass. But thankfully it doesn't matter. lol
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
SSgt Christopher Brose
>1 y
SSgt Gary Andrews - You know of course that every word in your post describes the President we had before this one, right?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Gary Andrews
SSgt Gary Andrews
>1 y
Well, Chris, maybe you can name off all the Obama appointees that failed to get clearances.....
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
4
4
0
Edited >1 y ago
Those who have nothing to hide are most likely not worried.
(4)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
>1 y
So, pretty much everyone is worried is what you're saying.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
MAJ Bryan Zeski - I think you picked up what I was putting down
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
>1 y
1SG (Join to see) - Should I put it back down again?
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Signal Support Systems Specialist
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close