Good and Bad Critiques of the Mueller Investigation

OK, now try to back that opinion up with facts, What did the Lawyer who wrote the article get factually wrong?

Hate him all day long, Trump is your president and you must deal with it like those of us dealt with the 8 years of do nothing Obama.

Huh? Never claimed anything about the article was 'factually wrong'. A little misleading perhaps. As an objective prosecutor, McCarthy agrees the expression of political opinions by investigators or prosecutors is not enough, by itself, to create the appearance of impropriety.

However, Adler leads in by saying, "Some concerns raised about the investigation are reasonable, but the overall thrust of the attacks -- that there is something improper or illegitimate about the investigation -- miss the mark." I simply pointed out that while McCarthy agrees there is no impropriety with some of Muller's associates, he also believes the investigation as a whole is illegitimate --- a corrupt attempt to impeach President Donald Trump. Alder conveniently left out that little fact. McCarthy has questioned the legitimacy of the Muller investigation from day one and Alder is simply trying to prove his point by saying, "see, even McCarthy agrees there is no impropriety".