Avatar feed
Responses: 4
Alan K.
4
4
0
I think I must have one of those....How cool.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Brett Wagner
3
3
0
So no paperwork just because it's for black powder? Just another reason why there shouldn't be a $200 tax stamp finger prints & passport photos for any suppressor.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA
7 y
Not to mention the whole concept of Freedom that this country was founded on.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Brett Wagner
Cpl Brett Wagner
7 y
The only group of people to use a suppressor to shoot at people has been government. Crap I'm on a list now.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Matthew S.
1
1
0
Interesting... so, if I read it correctly, if a sound suppressor is made as an integral part of the firearm itself then it isn't considered a suppressor? Couldn't any firearm then be made that way?

Even looking at the manual, though, I'm still not sure how you load it without getting powder in the suppressor.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA
7 y
I think it comes down to the legal designation of the firearm. On an AR-15, the legal firearm is the lower receiver. An integrally suppressed upper is not an integral part of the legal firearm. It's the same with Glocks: the lower is the firearm, so if you could permanently attach a silence to the barrel, it would still not be an integral part of the firearm.
As far as getting gunpowder in your silencer, I'm guessing that the baffles are funnel-shaped.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close