Avatar feed
Responses: 7
LTC Psychological Operations Officer
8
8
0
Funny how posters are saying that other posters are taking things out of context. Yet multiple police departments heard the same comments and felt the need to publicly state that they do not accept the POTUS' remarks and that they are inappropriate and unhelpful. These are not "snowflakes"; these are the Police Chiefs of departments that deal with the criminals every day. Yet they still felt it important to let the public know that they do not agree with Trump and that his comments do not help their situation at all.
(8)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Counterintelligence Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Wow, you calling me a snowflake after all your comments here and in other posts I have seen (and after following me here in this thread too). That's rich. You may claim to be a libertarian, but here and in other posts, you actually sound like far-left liberal cry baby. You know, I blocked you to avoid this nonsense, but sure I'll play a bit longer since you seem insistent on continuing this.

Yes I said you are no longer a cop. Is that not a true statement? I am pretty sure it is as you have already told me your background in other discussions (unless of course you are lying). So I am sorry that comment offended you enough to attack me, my opinion, and my background and to even follow me into this thread to keep egging me on. BTW: It doesn't remotely justify your ignorant comments.

Your response to me was basically telling me I didn't know what the hell I was talking about, and you bring up LOD deaths like a true asshole. Why would you even do that? What relevance does it have? The only reason I can fathom is that you have no argument. In any case, I blocked you in order to avoid talking to someone who thinks its appropriate to bring up such things (or to even suggest I don't know what its like to lose someone in the line of duty). Yet, even though blocked, you still follow and troll me. Nice.

And your comment on MS-13 just being like every gang? Yup, that right there proves you also have no clue what the hell you are talking about. But you still must be the expert and must be heard, despite you having no *current* experience with this criminal enterprise. You're a lawyer right? I bet in court judges have to tell you to shut up a lot. Is that why you feel it necessary to keep this arguing with me across multiple discussions?

Now, your comment stating that I am wrong about it not being the worst time to be a cop? Yeah, how would you know about that? Oh right, you quoted the crime rate like that is somehow related to this topic. And by the way, where did you get that information from? Because I can tell you that in many cities across the U.S. the crime rate (especially violent crime rate) is actually up, not down. You might want to check your sources. Again, you are not a current police officer and your comments demonstrate a clear disconnect with the current status of the law enforcement community. But why would you care about that? Your experience "in the past" is obviously more relevant then cops *currently* serving, even when talking about "current events." It doesn't matter that cops at my department and countless others are being shit on every day by a large portion of the public simply for doing their jobs. It doesn't matter that cops are being murdered while people continue to protest that cops are murderers. It takes a toll. And yes I have been to *too many* police funerals (thanks for reminding me).

I'll leave you with this. I don't care what your opinion is on the current status of law enforcement community, we obviously don't agree. The difference is, I am 100% confident that the *majority* of police officers today have the same opinions on the matter that I do. If you were truly honest with yourself, you would admit that most cops today would not agree with your comments and the only reason why you (and SFC Fuerhoff) even initially replied to me on this is because you dislike the POTUS. Sorry, but a large majority of cops are also supporters of the POTUS. I can say that with confidence because besides the many cops I work with, I also have friends in other departments across the U.S., and also most of my National Guard military unit is made of LEOs from countless local and federal LE agencies.

Now do us both a favor and find someone else to pester.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
>1 y
CW2 Brad Stockham - Nice blocking there. That's how you get people to see your side - block them. Did you read the first post in this thread? The OP also says "it's funny." It's a fucking expression. Grow up and just be a little more mature about things when people disagree with you.

I never said my experience as a SARC "trumps" anyone's experience. You asked me if I knew what it was like to look at someone who was just raped. Yes I HAVE! I have had to be the one to bear the bad news that their perpetrator got away with it. No you are a horrible judge of character and not all cops are good judge of character. Really? Okay so when I got assaulted by my ex the first time and I reported it the female cop told me "Oh he'll be in jail by the weekend." Nope he sure wasn't because when they talked to him he completely lied about what happened. So it turned into he said/she said. There wasn't physical evidence because I waited a day to report and it happened in a hotel. So the hotel room got cleaned up. I know my fault for not reporting it at the hotel but I was fucking scared and I left him there after he passed out and went to my dad's. I went somewhere I knew was safe. So then I ask the female officer about what's going on and she starts to dodge me. THEN my ex tells me how he's meeting her off duty for lunch and she tells him everything I tell her. So I told victim witness and then I talked to her chief or captain or whoever was her boss. He then assigned a new detective to the case. So obviously all cops are NOT a good judge of character because my ex told me she was telling him "Oh I don't think you could have done this, you're too nice." And she was like in her 50s and had been a cop well over 20 years yet my ex played her like a fiddle. So you stop pretending you know everything and you're the SME over other people. You do know more than I do I'm sure. But you asked a question I answered it. So don't discount my experience with rape and sexual assault victims. I never discounted yours. I don't have to sit here and make a brag sheet about something that doesn't fucking affect me. If you want to brag on a social media site about what an awesome cop you are go ahead. I don't care. But I do know cops and for you to say I don't is ridiculous.

Where did I disrespect your background? I didn't. You disrespected me and I won't sit back and take it. Go ahead and block me all you want. I don't care. Loud mouth? Give me a fucking break. I could school you on some other topics but this is not the right forum to do so and you don't have the clearance for me to do it. I never told you "how it really is" I told you what the fucking group is putting out about their recruiting. That's it. So if you want to sit there and be big tough macho guy go ahead. I don't care. I've dealt with plenty of guys like you in my life. No skin off my back. Have a lovely day!
(1)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Counterintelligence Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Yeah, not trying to get you to see my side anymore. That is clearly not possible with people who don't like facts, unless they agree with their viewpoints. Once you decided you were automatically the smartest person in the room, it was pretty easy to figure that out.

By the way, I am obviously passionate about such topics because I live this every day. You don't. And just so its clear SFC Fuerhoff, you actually did disrespect me, you might want to re-read your initial comments here and in other posts. And, I blocked you only after you decided to talk trash, and after you down-voted me for calling you out on something you said (expression or not).

That, and I also really don't care to read anymore of your leftist rants, here or in any other topics (obviously the block feature only prevents you from tagging me--too bad). Of course, apparently blocking you just to end this nonsense is also somehow offensive to you.

Oh well, I give you permission to go cry about it. With that, you have a lovely day as well! Hopefully I never have to meet you in person.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Counterintelligence Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Wow. Trust me, you didn't hurt my feelings. And as the person that is clearly following me around in multiple posts after being blocked (you), clearly you are the one who is upset and/or had their feelings hurt.

Now I understand why you seem to have so many people that don't like you on RP. Can't let anything go can you? What's the point of even talking with you anyway? I have yet see you concede to anyone's viewpoints that don't agree with your own (and I am not speaking of just me). Whats worse, I have seen you talk trash about people's religions as well on several occasions, making comments insinuating that anyone who believes in God is an idiot. When I tried to politely tell you that was not appropriate, your response was basically to say "well I have been mistreated in the past for being an atheist, so I have the right to say this." So yeah, you just have a blank check to say whatever the hell you want. Makes sense. You've got some serious problems upstairs. Since you are a lawyer, maybe you can afford to hire a psychiatrist?

My guess is, you love to just find some politically charged topic on RP, pop in, and talk some trash. Never mind being civil. If anyone disagrees and/or blocks you, you follow them around and keep hassling them. And on the Internet no less... I was civil with you before, but after your comments here, I can see your true colors. I get it old man, you want to stay relevant. Sorry, you aren't.

And don't get it twisted, I am not denying your experience, nor am I saying I have more experience than you. I am saying your idiotic comments invalidates it and make you look like a joke. Here's the bottom line: I don't care if you were the goddamn Chief of Police of Tokyo. When you attack my experience, my character, and further make comments stating I don't know what its like to lose officers in the line-of-duty, you get NO RESPECT from me. The same goes for anyone making such asinine comments. As far as I am concerned, you are just another piece of trash liberal nutcase running around crying about the fact that Donald Trump is President. Boo hoo. Cry me a river.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Dennis Hicks
5
5
0
Edited >1 y ago
The main embarrassment are those having daily meltdowns due the hate they can't and won't control. Trumps is entertaining and playing those fools like a well worn piano. The bigger issue is they can't see how foolish they are as they wish the President to fail and drool at any perceived flaw they can make up. Trump is doing exactly what he was elected for, shinning a bright light on the mentally defective while erasing the failure.
(5)
Comment
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
1SG Dennis Hicks
>1 y
Yup, they are coming out of the dark like roaches, spittle flying and He is not my President tantrums. I am sure it will eventually get old but for now I hope he keeps it up. We have had decades of business as usual with the people getting screwed at every turn by both parties. Some folks actual believe both parties actually give a shit about those who are their members.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Counterintelligence Technician
5
5
0
Edited >1 y ago
I don't know, what's wrong with people who hear only one particular comment in a speech instead of focusing on what the speech is really about: An extremely violent, transnational criminal gang that is raping and murdering in multiple cities across the U.S. at an alarming rate?

What's wrong with *some* people who continue to "victimize" criminals such as these and others?

What's wrong with people who would rather paint cops as criminals when 99% of them are just trying to keep their communities safe, while referring to real criminals who choose to do bad things as the innocent ones?

What's wrong with people who would rather focus on a single part of what someone says because they dislike the person saying it, completely disregarding the fact it was said to address a real-world problem? How many people have to die for certain people to realize that criminals need to be treated like criminals so that the criminal recidivism drops in this country?
(5)
Comment
(0)
SPC Kevin Ford
SPC Kevin Ford
>1 y
CW3 (Join to see) Regardless of the threat, the POTUS encouraging law enforcement to become criminals themselves hardly seems like a great idea.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Counterintelligence Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
SPC Kevin Ford - I did not take it as that. I took it as the POTUS basically saying (in his own way) "Do what you gotta do to put these violent murderers away, I got your back."

As I can pretty much guarantee most (if not all) cops in attendance at that speech did. However if you are looking for ammo to attack the POTUS with, I am sure you will hear the worst wherever/whenever he speaks.

And I'm sorry, the level of the threat absolutely matters.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Counterintelligence Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - With all due respect sir, you are obviously not a cop anymore, but I am. So this is a topic I am very passionate about.

I have been in the law enforcement field for over 16 years working for multiple agencies (12 of those wearing a badge/sworn). I can say with absolute certainty that there has never been a worse time to be a cop. With fraudulent claims/lies being made by people about police every day (almost all of them proven false but never make it to the news), constant rhetoric (usually from the left side of the political aisle and groups aligned with them) insinuating all cops are racists and/or murders, and never-ending cries (also usually from the liberal-left) to victimize criminals (even extremely violent ones and repeat offenders). President Obama and his AGs did nothing to help police in this country. NOTHING. In fact, they even fanned the flames of hatred on multiple occasions in incidents involving police, even before an investigation had taken place. In Ferguson, MO, for instance, a false narrative was created by a lying witness, but it was proven that the officer involved was just doing his job. Before an investigation even began though, both Pres. Obama and AG Holder made insinuating comments, and Holder stood with race-baiters like Al Sharpton spreading lies and only giving fuel to the criminal rioters and looters. This lie of course led to the creation of Black Lives Matter, but that is a whole other issue.

Point is, there is finally a POTUS back in the White House that *openly* supports the police in this country. That is the kind of leadership that is needed for police. Rhetoric or not, it is positive, and IT DOES have an effect on police. You can call it "playing to the public" all you want, but his open-support for law enforcement is only thing that will stop that Ferguson effect from spreading in the minds of officers. Without that, it feels like we are fighting a losing battle against criminals because there is no outward support.

Further, no one said ANYTHING about abusing a suspect. You are echoing the biased news reports and completely ignoring the issue he was speaking about. He was giving a speech, and as we all know, the current POTUS is colorful in language using hyperbole QUITE OFTEN. You may have been a cop, but you are clearly on the liberal side of this issue if you are willing to say 2+2=5 just to put an argument together.

Despite your comment, this speech was about murderers and putting them away. It was about one of the most violent gangs in history. And it was about supporting the police so we can do our damn jobs. Nothing more, nothing less. You can continue to read into it if you want, but that speech was meant for me because I am cop, not for the liberal politicians/activists who find any reason right now to attack the POTUS.

And speaking for myself and every other cop I work with, we actually liked the speech, and didn't think he was giving us a blank check to "abuse suspects" as you put it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Counterintelligence Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
>1 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - Did you just call me "Sonny"? Really? I don't have a clue what losing officers is all about? So, you want make this about comparing LOD deaths or how many police officer funerals I have been to? Who in the hell do you think you are? YOU have NO IDEA who I am or how many friends I have lost in the line-of-duty *AND* in the military. Your comments are both IGNORANT, and STUPID. Based on those statements alone I would bet my pension that you do not have a damn clue on what the current status of the law enforcement community is.

FOR THE RECORD, I was talking about the INSANE rhetoric from the left and further pointing out that you (AND OTHERS) focusing on a single comment in the President's speech, missing the WHOLE point of the speech entirely, is exactly the problem with your viewpoint. Instead of addressing that, you'd rather sit there and snipe at someone who has dedicated his life to law enforcement (and yes, UNFORTUNATELY, LOST TOO MANY FRIENDS TO THIS JOB), pretending to somehow be better than me because "YOU THINK" you know more about what cops go through today than I do. How dare you. You think the police today are too militarized? That proves you have no idea what the hell is happening right now on the streets in countless cities! We are responding to a threat, criminals out to get us, many with high-powered weapons, and with ZERO support from a large part of the American public. Yet people like you would rather quote a couple limited studies (or try to compare your police experience from the 1980s) to try say you know what's best? Are you freegin kidding me? You are clearly delusional!

I'm done conversing with you. You are obviously another lost cause.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close