Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SSG Carlos Madden
3
3
0
I think it has to do with Trump's comments during the campaign. Presumably if you voted for Trump you agreed with his position, one of which was that Bergdahl was a traitor. Therefore you would already have your mind made up that he was a traitor before the trial started.

reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1650XI
(3)
Comment
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
>1 y
Oh I get why it's beneficial to the defense. But to make the assumption that just because I voted for Trump, I would, therefore, tow his line, rather than my own, seems...misguided. This is a poor example of a case, though, because my mind IS made up....but Trump had nothing to do with that.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Carlos Madden
SSG Carlos Madden
>1 y
I think the defense is probably looking for anything they can at this point!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Steven Mangus
2
2
0
Nothing but tomfoolery..
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Defense Paralegal
0
0
0
The whole point of jury selection is to test bias and to seat a fair panel. Certainly someone's support for the Commander in Chief, who previously made disparaging marks about Bergdahl, could potentially be a bias (or be perceived to be one). I don't think anything is crazy about wanting to explore that.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
>1 y
And the judge agreed with you. They can ask about bias. They can't ask who they voted for.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close