Avatar feed
Responses: 10
MSgt Nondestructive Inspection (NDI)
6
6
0
Here is a free tip. Never send nude photos of yourself to anyone, ever. Never video yourself or allow youself to be videod. That way if people are up front about that in a relationship and someone takes secret videos or pictures later on and posts them they are guilty of a lot more than passing on what you freely gave to them. We have to teach our young people that the internet is forever! Electronic media is too easily abused.
(6)
Comment
(0)
PO2 Robert M.
PO2 Robert M.
>1 y
MSgt (Join to see) BRAVO ZULU!! - once it is out there, it can NEVER be totally erased/redacted/removed/forgotten, etc.! ! ! ! !
(0)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
But is it not a distraction to worry about things that are for the most part lawfull when discussing the actions of criminals. Comparing the unwise to the criminal seem a touch inappropriate.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Donald Murphy
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Richard I P.
Capt Richard I P.
>1 y
Target-hardening is an acceptable lesson. Only if it is subordinated to the overwhelming message that it is unacceptable to sexually assault or harass your brothers or sisters in arms, physically, digitally, by images words or deeds.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Richard StCyr
4
4
0
I see more mandatory training in the future.......Death by Power Point on digital permanency and not sharing nude photos of oneself or others....... At least two hours..... maybe an added hour to the current SHARP training, (which by the way was pretty well done here at FLW this year with a couple new video clips and in my opinion a better instructor).
Or we could apply the golden rule, treat others as you'd like to treated.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Robert Webster
3
3
0
Edited >1 y ago
I will believe it, if and when the complicit women are also publicly prosecuted, not just the men. If they (officials in charge) do not treat all who are complicit in this equally, how can anyone trust them.

And for those of you out there that want to claim that is a 'blame the victim' attitude, then you are a part of the problem, because by that statement it can be extrapolated that you do not believe that men can be raped. How hypocritical of you.

What do you want? Equality or Equity? If you want equality, good for you; however, if you want equity stop lying to yourself and other people.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MAJ James Goldberg
MAJ James Goldberg
>1 y
Under the UCMJ, what would you prosecute the offenders with?
(2)
Reply
(0)
CSM Richard StCyr
CSM Richard StCyr
>1 y
MAJ James Goldberg - Possibly ART 134-13 Disorderly Conduct or 134-27 Indecent Exposure. But I find it unlikely this would happen.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG Robert Webster
>1 y
MAJ James Goldberg - Considering the act that is under discussion; just as others have already suggested, we could start with Articles 133 and 134, and one of the elements could be moral turpitude as an example. In some of the cases, there is also the possibility of being charged under Article 92; since it would be apparent that some of the pictures were created while the individuals were under the authority of *General Order #1* or any derivative or similar order. These are also some of the items that the 'other' complicit parties will probably be charged with, are they not?

For additional information, I could also direct you to http://www.sapr.mil/
(0)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
For the most part unless you identify yourself as military and post publicly yourself there is nothing the women can be charged with. Sending nude photos is not a statutory violation not a violation of the UCMJ, in fact the courts have ruled such photos are protected speech.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close