8
8
0
Ok, I'll have to refrain from posting more links, not before this one though! Ok, so some may be slightly relieved that the Democrats themselves are calling out against operational ties with the Clinton Foundation if Hillary becomes POTUS.
Now, what is interesting is that the liberal media is busy with a discreditation effort towards Trump and Mexico's President Pena Nieto. Is it not obvious that the liberal media will stop at nothing.
Would calling for Hillary Clinton's family to separate themselves from the foundation because of the implications of business, domestic and foreign, be akin to Trump's kids running his business? Why are they quick to make such a suggestion against Hillary and not Trump? Does this mean that Trump's family should cut ties with their business?
Now, what is interesting is that the liberal media is busy with a discreditation effort towards Trump and Mexico's President Pena Nieto. Is it not obvious that the liberal media will stop at nothing.
Would calling for Hillary Clinton's family to separate themselves from the foundation because of the implications of business, domestic and foreign, be akin to Trump's kids running his business? Why are they quick to make such a suggestion against Hillary and not Trump? Does this mean that Trump's family should cut ties with their business?
Cutting Ties to the Clinton Foundation
Posted from nytimes.com
Election 2016
Republicans
Democrats
Ethics
Corruption
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
8
8
0
Presidents must sever all private business connections to avoid even the appearance of misfeasance or malfeasance while administering the government. Thus, the Clinton promise to sever ties with the Foundation if Hillary is elected is a canard. They are merely trying to hide the fact that the Clinton Foundation is a criminal enterprise selling influence to the highest bidder. If not, then Hillary need only disassociate herself during her term in office while Bill and Chelsea run it. But, without Hillary's position as Scty of State or President, their Foundation has nothing to offer. They may as well close up shop if they can't peddle influence if Hillary is elected.
(8)
(0)
2
2
0
Trump Enterprises is a private business, not a foundation. In addition the clinton foundation has been found to accept PayforPlay, not to mention a cool $500,000 billy boy got from the same bank that mysteriously represented the Russian buyers of 25% of the US Strategic Uranium Reserve, now if you ask me, that is Treason, yeap approved by the State Dept under hillary clinton. IS time to see things for what they are, they are a Corrupt Criminal Enterprise.
To Spin this issue as to trump does not even come close, nice try but no.
As for the Uranium, Pravda, the official publication of the Russian government has been giving accolades to Vladimir Putin, for having obtained 25% of our Uranium reserve right under our noses, shouldn't the demorats be calling for an investigation on this in Congress, seems more important than hacking.
To Spin this issue as to trump does not even come close, nice try but no.
As for the Uranium, Pravda, the official publication of the Russian government has been giving accolades to Vladimir Putin, for having obtained 25% of our Uranium reserve right under our noses, shouldn't the demorats be calling for an investigation on this in Congress, seems more important than hacking.
(2)
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
SGT (Join to see) - Of course but topic is a Public Foundation, rotten as hell, corrupt to the core and now they are going to come up with what basically is "Let us keep Collecting and Playing just in case"
It is a very clear cut matter and even the NY Times rag is asking them to stop but no, "lets keep rolling in dough while we get there", no sense of decency.
It is a very clear cut matter and even the NY Times rag is asking them to stop but no, "lets keep rolling in dough while we get there", no sense of decency.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google