Posted on Jul 10, 2016
Religious-freedom group ups ante, threatens courtroom battle over 'Crusaders' logo
3.98K
49
26
7
7
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 15
We are given freedom of religion.
No where is there a freedom from hearing seeing what one does not like. Trying to impose such is anti-freedom.
No where is there a freedom from hearing seeing what one does not like. Trying to impose such is anti-freedom.
(7)
(0)
TSgt (Join to see)
The establishment clause of the first amendment does grant the freedom FROM religion, so that is another way to look at it
(0)
(0)
Capt (Join to see)
TSgt (Join to see) - All freedom ends or becomes limited when they deny another their right. Unless someone is being forced to read or hear something there is no violation of another's rights.
I would also like to see just where the freedom FROM religion is stated in the establishment clause.
I would also like to see just where the freedom FROM religion is stated in the establishment clause.
(0)
(0)
The MRFF again? Those people are idiots.
I notice the piece calls them a "religious freedom group". That's the exact opposite of what they are.
I notice the piece calls them a "religious freedom group". That's the exact opposite of what they are.
(7)
(0)
Without resorting to name calling. Which, trust me, I really want to but I'm afraid of a lawsuit. It seems to me these guys only pick on select units. I have seen them win some and loose some but, what I would really like to see is what the Corps has to say to these guys. I think the Corps would have some "colorful adjectives" for these guys.
(6)
(0)
Read This Next