6
6
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
NATO, a sensible response to an aggressive Soviet Union. Too bad it no longer has any teeth.
(2)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
Other than Bosnia, when have they accomplished much? When they did we were the primary force acting on the NATO treaty.
(1)
(0)
SFC Wade W.
MCPO Roger Collins - NATO, just like the nuclear deterrent, was about a show of force. Our exercises, the show of solidarity, the placement of NATO affiliated bases. These were all about showing Russia a unified force that would respond if threatened. It was NATO, not just the United States, that created the environment that brought down the wall between the Germanys.
(1)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
SFC Wade W. - Ask Ukraine how that worked out. Also, Without more digging, as I recall, our strategies under President Reagan had for more impact on the destruction of the Berlin Wall. "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! Where were the leaders of NATO?
(1)
(0)
SFC Wade W.
MCPO Roger Collins - Many of us are very disappointed in our current President for the non-response to the matter in Ukraine. As for the President Reagan matter, yes, he had a large part in the wall coming down. And the NATO leaders were right there with him. But 40 yrs of NATO made that demand that much stronger. No one can deny that. NATO is not what it used to be as I said in my original comment.
(0)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
"We defend all these countries, we're not properly reimbursed for the kind of money that we're spending," he said.
"We cannot spend billions and billions and billions of dollars on defending all of these countries," he added.
"We cannot spend billions and billions and billions of dollars on defending all of these countries," he added.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next