Avatar feed
Responses: 4
MAJ Ken Landgren
6
6
0
Infantry Divisions were tank heavy. At least the ones doing the major end around. The Iraqis were fixated by the Marines in the Gulf and 1CD was feinting up the middle of of Iraq's Defenses by going North into the Iraqis area and returning. This entailed reducing Iraqi obstacles to facilitate the feints which helped the final assault. The Iraqis fixated on the Marines and 1CD, East and South respectively.

Traditionally Arab Armies used roads, wadis, and highways to navigate through the desert to prevent losing bearing thus causing the perception the Coalition Army had the same limitation. The Coalition had a hand held GPS to fix that problem and give it confidence. The 101st, 82nd, and 24ID (Tank Heavy) started in earnest with the M1 in front. The M1 had almost impenetrable armor and had a longer effective range which is a "stand off distance" or range where we could unilaterally destroy targets without fear of being engaged effectively. The mission of the left hook Divisions was to destroy Iraq's military COG, the Republican Guard or Tanakawa Divisions. Once the strength of the Iraq's military was destroyed it became a turkey shoot as regular army units looked for the infamous "Highway of Death" which became a choke point of destruction. I am out of drivel now.
(6)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
>1 y
I would guess our M1s had ballistic distance advantage of three times the T72s.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
6
6
0
I was involved the year before Desert Storm in the planning of what would eventually be known as Operation Desert Storm SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL.
That was the first real test of M2 Bradley AFV, M3 Bradley CFV and the M1 Abrams tank is combat. Despite the challenges of sand storms and vast distances of land with little landmarks where are GPS. The M1 and Bradley's did very well against the T-72 export MBT. Desert Storm was a defining moment for the combined arms team in modern armored warfare.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
4
4
0
And again what vehicles lead the ground assault?
(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
9 y
MAJ Ken Landgren that's a no brainer, you know and I know that one!!
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
9 y
:/
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
MAJ Ken Landgren
9 y
Thank you for clarifying! It would have been nice to have tanks in the Div Cav.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close