Rp logo flat shadow
Command Post What is this?
Posted on Feb 7, 2018
CPT Alex Gallo
52K
137
35
53
53
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 18
Lt Col Charlie Brown
16
16
0
I think more of us with the inclination need to run for office beginning at the local level. Military experience with its emphasis on leadership and ethics makes us well qualified to help find a way forward.
(16)
Comment
(0)
SPC Mike Lake
SPC Mike Lake
7 y
I totally agree Lt Col Charlie Brown
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Field Radio Operator
11
11
0
Edited 7 y ago
I go along with renew and rebuild. I do not go along with disrupt which has a negative connotation. I have seen too many individuals and organizations that try to bring attention to themselves by disruption, i.e. blocking traffic, protesting anything at the drop of a hat, refusing to listen to views counter to their own, and generally being a pain in the ass, instead of doing something constructive in the community. Switch "Disrupt" with "Build Trust," and the message will come across better.
(11)
Comment
(0)
CPT Alex Gallo
CPT Alex Gallo
7 y
Totally agree — Disruption can and should be *constructive*. That’s the goal here. Let’s work together to figure it out. Keep the comments, thoughts, and insights coming. Share this with other folks as well.
(5)
Reply
(0)
SPC Margaret Higgins
SPC Margaret Higgins
7 y
1125d2b0
CPT Alex Gallo - I believe that we should Rebuild and Renew our Country; first of all. This country has the potential to be: STRONG, UNIFIED, NOT PREJUDICED, LOVING, TRUSTING OF OUR FELLOW CITIZENS and, AT PEACE WITHIN OUR BOARDERS.
I greatly dislike weapons; and, I just wish that the right people could own them. I know that I am Dreaming here; though. We all have the potential, as citizens: TO GET ALONG- BLACKS, YELLOWS, WHITES....ALL THE GREAT RACES OF THIS COUNTRY.
Thank you kindly, Captain Gallo, for asking me to share my views on this.
-Margaret C. Higgins U.S. Army Retired
(2)
Reply
(0)
CW3 David Covey
CW3 David Covey
>1 y
Your dislike for weapons should not interfere with others rights to own one. I agree the mentally unstable should not have them, but have you noticed the definition of unstable is constantly changing and being added to? Have you also noticed that after any shooting, except the ones where a gun owner actually prevented a crime demands from those who "greatly dislike weapons" start in on the 2nd Amendment and want to eliminate it or ban those scary black guns? Just who in your opinion are the "Right People"?
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Jack Durish
11
11
0
Interesting. I have been working the past couple of days on an essay about compromise addressing the fact that we are a "house divided" and whether or not the division can be bridged by compromise or if we have to fight another civil war. The uncivil war now flaming across the nation isn't getting us anywhere, is it?
(11)
Comment
(0)
SGT Tony Clifford
SGT Tony Clifford
7 y
I tend to think that the "house divided" is a bit on the hyperbolic side. The lunatic fringes of both conservatives and progressives have been controlling the public discourse. Most people be they conservative or progressive and even classical liberals are sick of the fiery rhetoric the Democrats and Republicans are throwing around. Everything in these people's eyes are an attack on the oppressed or an afront to the U.S.. This is poison to our republic. I think that we as a people should cast aside monikers like political parties and focus on individual issues. We should focus on an individualism and ignore the collectivist trappings of political parties. We should also have a national discussion on the merits of honest argument and the importance of multiple perspectives on issues. That's how we fix the mess.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SGT Patrick Reno
SGT Patrick Reno
>1 y
Jack I always enjoy reading your posts
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Zachary Wiederstein
MSgt Zachary Wiederstein
>1 y
SGT Tony Clifford - Tony, I agree. How can I start a conversation with anyone if all they want to do is scream at me? My point is we can't even have any conversations because we as a society have become to binary. In other words you are either with me or against me. If you are with me then you must agree with me on every point, if you don't then you are against me and if we disagree on one thing then we must disagree on everything. Which also means I have to hate you as well. This is not a good environment for conversation. If we can't talk to each other we can'e even begin to solve the real problems.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPO Nate S.
CPO Nate S.
1 y
"Uncivil War" indeed!!!

Oh, "Lunatic Fringes" is on point.

Plus "collectively" we are "Americans" if we have to courage to embrace three little words "We the people". There is not a modifier after the word "the" nor before the word "people" there is only the "collective" - WE - that starts the sentence of our "collective" purpose to first and foremost "Establish Justice". Because with our true "blind justice" the high and low are not judge with any level of equity or equality no matter the rhetoric being spewed.

So, how is justice done? It should be simple, but is often complicated because was people that take the "my way or the highway approach" they are often too willing to under mine what the "We" together are when the:

- capacity to NOT insure domestic tranquility,
- capacity to NOT provide for the common defense,
- capacity to NOT promote the general welfare, and
- capacity to NOT work to secure the blessing of liberty,

are ignored thus creating the PERFECT disunion and provides the cornerstone upon which the erect an edifice on the quick sand of emotions.

How many times must it be said that the Founders were "imperfect" yet, despite their imperfections they know that a "more perfect union" would be a work in progress. They understood, despite what some rhetoric attempted to provide that there were evils that would not be tolerated and eventually would need to be dismantled - slavery for one.

Finally, then people "scream at me during a conversation" I find them, regardless of their achieved education status - TOO STUPID and TOO IGNORANT to engage with! It means they are using raw emotion to try to get their points across verse logic and common sense and solutions that are balanced, yet forward thinking.

Also, "challenge" is a good word, but if we cannot challenge unjust practices or rhetoric how are "We the people..." to know that "We the people..." have a voice regardless?

Inclosing, one cannot make an omelet without cracking a few eggs.

Ask yourself "What is broken" "What is really broken?" then how, once identified, would we take each broken item and develop a systems-based approach that is transparent that the 60-70 of the people in the middle will want to engage?

Each thing that is broken can be categorized under each of the points of the Preamble. Perhaps an inventory to organize would be in order. Would any like to start the list:

"We the people..."
- Issue ......
- Issue ......
- etc.
"...form a more perfect union..."
- Issue.....
- Issue.....
- etc.
"...establish justice..."
- Issue....
- Issue...
- etc.
"...insure domestic tranquility..."
- Issue...
- Issue...
- etc.
"...provide for the common defense..."
- Issue.....
- Issue.....
- etc.
"...promote the general welfare..."
- Issue....
- Issue...
- etc.
"...secure the blessings of liberty..."
- Issue...
- Issue...
- etc.

Think about it, if laws are not being designed and adhered to in this framework are "We" capable as a people to really govern ourselves in a manner with dignity and integrity of purpose? Issues in today's "uncivil war" provided by the "lunatic fringes" are NOT consistent with the PREAMBLE's mission/vision for this nation.

As [[615130: msgt-zachary-wiederstein] stated:

"...If we can't talk to each other we can'e even begin to solve the real problems...."

We have to frame each issue where it belongs in each these enumerated missions and visions of this nation. A nation my father came to after WWII, who chose to serve in the US Air Force for the lessons he learned while become a citizen on his way to becoming a 100% SCD veteran.

[792682: cpt-alex-gallo] From an ole navy guy thank you for the post!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close