Posted on Sep 15, 2015
Why are so many people "Dissatisfied" with the Performance of President Obama?
74.8K
1.29K
674
36
22
14
I'm a HUGE Admirer of our President! I Personally Love the job he has done! Especially with what he had to tell with when he took over the Office! Many people seem to Disregard that fact! Why? I don't know! However, many of you seem Dissatisfied! Why? He hasn't done anything for this Country in terms of Moving it Forward? The Country hasn't Progressed under him? What are your Thoughts!
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 147
Becoming a president of our beautiful country is an honor that only leader of leaders can achieve. I might disagree with our CIC in my political opinions but as a sane, intelligent, and a leader myself, I give credit when it is due. Results speak louder than words. My 401K is much better than it was a decade ago, I see fewer houses getting foreclosed (I remember 2006-2007 when entire manufacturing belt was in bad shape), I see consumer confidence up. As a hiring manager and owner, I find difficulties getting enough resumes. We have had instances where before we could give offer to someone, that person already had offers. So in my humble opinion and real experience, I can say that job market is definitely better. Automobile Industry is doing better. I remember when we were looking shaky and countries like China were flexing their economic muscle... Today the landscape is much different, US is back to being the most stable and growing economy... China, Russia not so much. Yes, our CIC could use a better foresight when troops were withdrawn from Iraq. Affordable Care Act could have been better to stop the spiraling Medical costs, ER visits by uninsured, yes there are glitches but I think a start is better than no start. We are only super power in the world where some families could never afford seeing a physician and that I think is a shame to us. We are the beacon of what is right and that in my opinion was not so. So while blame our CIC, we need to take some time to research and explore before taking information from non reliable sources.
(1)
(0)
I lean on the Dem side but the way Iraq went down was a failure. I will leave it at that. I don't think health care was all that bad. I makes sense but the ME is a mess and Hilary didn't help him at all either.
(1)
(0)
If you like your Dr you can keep your Dr. If you like your health insurance you can keep your health insurance..this from the lips of the President. Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Syrian red line, IRS targeting conservative groups, accumulating mode debt than all other Presidents combined 18 Trillion and counting, changing the definition of marriage that has been established from the beginning of time, providing Iran with 15 billion and admitting some of that money will be used to fund terrorist organizations, defunding our military while increasing funds for those who enter our country illegally, supporting thuggery while degrading police officers, Veterans dying while awaiting an appointment at a VA hospital under this administration. Our country is weaker and and less respected than any time in the past century. Aborted babies being dismembered and body parts sold for produce. This should be enough to answer the question.
(1)
(0)
SPC Andrew Griffin
Strong Points and they are ALL Valid Points! Thank you for the Wealth of Information!
(1)
(0)
Ok, I'll bite. Iran ( the one who says they will wipe Israel and the US off the map ) will self-inspect their "progress" and tell us the truth? Hmmmmm. Uh, huh. Those ICBM's aren't for Israel. They can already hit them. Guess who they are for? F'n idiots.
(1)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
SSG Washington George - Staff; There is a 'slight' difference between an MRBM and an ICBM. Do you know what it is?
Admittedly there is a (slim) chance that some country (or coalition of countries) could "wipe Israel off the map", but there is ZERO chance that any country (other than Russia [and possibly China or India] could even come close to doing that with the United States of America.
Now, have you thought about this one - "In the incredibly unlikely event that Iran managed to amass and launch sufficient weaponry to cripple the United States of America - what would it have left to retaliate when Russia, China, India, Pakistan, France, Britain, and Israel launched THEIR preemptive strikes to preclude the possibility of Iran also attacking them?".
How about this one - "In the incredibly unlikely event that Iran managed to amass and launch sufficient weaponry to cripple Israel - what would it have left to retaliate when Russia, China, India, Pakistan, France, Britain, and the United States of America launched THEIR preemptive strikes to preclude the possibility of Iran also attacking them?".
Or this one - "Exactly what evidence is there to support the conclusion that the Iranian leadership consists solely of suicidal idiots who have absolutely no ability to forecast the long-term results of their own actions and simply want to have their own country and all of its people annihilated?".
Admittedly there is a (slim) chance that some country (or coalition of countries) could "wipe Israel off the map", but there is ZERO chance that any country (other than Russia [and possibly China or India] could even come close to doing that with the United States of America.
Now, have you thought about this one - "In the incredibly unlikely event that Iran managed to amass and launch sufficient weaponry to cripple the United States of America - what would it have left to retaliate when Russia, China, India, Pakistan, France, Britain, and Israel launched THEIR preemptive strikes to preclude the possibility of Iran also attacking them?".
How about this one - "In the incredibly unlikely event that Iran managed to amass and launch sufficient weaponry to cripple Israel - what would it have left to retaliate when Russia, China, India, Pakistan, France, Britain, and the United States of America launched THEIR preemptive strikes to preclude the possibility of Iran also attacking them?".
Or this one - "Exactly what evidence is there to support the conclusion that the Iranian leadership consists solely of suicidal idiots who have absolutely no ability to forecast the long-term results of their own actions and simply want to have their own country and all of its people annihilated?".
(0)
(0)
SSgt Randy Saulsberry
Really, this is one of the most ignorant comments about the Iran deal. When you dont consider all the angles of an issue you make comments like that.
1. With the Sanctions that we did have in place, was that stopping them from developing the tech to enrich uranium so that they could get a nuke? NOPE
2. the rest of the world was already going to talk with Iran about lifting the sanctions and all countries stated even if we took a harder stance on Iran that they would not not honor it and would still lift the sanctions they had and give Iran back the money and goods that they had frozen within their countries.
3. They dont self report they had to agree to allow the UN to perform periodic inspections.
All facts.
1. With the Sanctions that we did have in place, was that stopping them from developing the tech to enrich uranium so that they could get a nuke? NOPE
2. the rest of the world was already going to talk with Iran about lifting the sanctions and all countries stated even if we took a harder stance on Iran that they would not not honor it and would still lift the sanctions they had and give Iran back the money and goods that they had frozen within their countries.
3. They dont self report they had to agree to allow the UN to perform periodic inspections.
All facts.
(0)
(0)
I'm going to leave my opinion and politics out of this discussion.
The only thing I want to say is that the picture is wholly inaccurate and bias.
I heard worse, saw worse, and society accepted as normal far worse the criticism, disrespect, and mockery of President Bush.
The only thing I want to say is that the picture is wholly inaccurate and bias.
I heard worse, saw worse, and society accepted as normal far worse the criticism, disrespect, and mockery of President Bush.
(1)
(0)
SSgt Randy Saulsberry
Its because Bush was an idiot that had little understanding of the english language. but i dont remember any news reporters joking about him getting assissinated like they did with the current President.
(0)
(1)
MAJ (Join to see)
SSgt Randy Saulsberry - Both of them have said stupid things. And done so often.
Or did you forget about "Corpsemen". Or all the people wanting to imprison Bush, or flee to Canada, etc.? Or all the hateful media coverage waiting for any slip up?
Bush wasn't an idiot that everyone portrays him as. And while I don't like Obama, he's not as bad as portrayed either. Don't drink the media kool-aid.
Or did you forget about "Corpsemen". Or all the people wanting to imprison Bush, or flee to Canada, etc.? Or all the hateful media coverage waiting for any slip up?
Bush wasn't an idiot that everyone portrays him as. And while I don't like Obama, he's not as bad as portrayed either. Don't drink the media kool-aid.
(0)
(0)
Not sure who stated that Ben Carson cannot become President because he has never held an elected position. Does anyone remember the names, Eisenhower, Hoover and Taft? I don't they ever did..... and I think they did ok......... What does the Constutution state?
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
But General Eisenhower was at least military. That is a plus in my estimation. I think it is very important, and has long-reaching influence when a President has had military experience. Especially at higher levels. President Taft was a member of the Connecticut Home Guard. I think that is better than nothing, but I'm not sure what the Home Guard is.
(0)
(0)
It has nothing to do with the color of his skin; and everything to do with his policies! POTUS's policies are simply wrong; his social progressivism is the antithesis of our National Values and history!
(1)
(0)
The same reason why everyone on the left hated Reagan and the Bush presidencies. Today's America there is zero tolerance for anther persons hero in the White House. SPC Griffin I wish it was not that way!
(1)
(0)
LTC Christopher Sands
Reagan had House and Senate dems over to the white house all the time. I remember last year when the dems were complaining that the President would not even have House or Senate Dems over to the white House.
(0)
(0)
MSgt Joseph Redmond
Well it seems a lot of congressmen have Obama on fast dial. The ones that retired said it and the rest will let you know in 2017 after they lie to you again so they can stay in Office. It is not safe for a GOP to say Obama is a good man.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next