Posted on Sep 15, 2014
MAJ Multifunctional Logistician
22.7K
98
40
6
6
0
379730
We all realize that other social media forums exist, however, I am curious to see what others think about the site---Together We Served. I have an account that I established during my first deployment, however, it doesn't seem to possess the same qualities as RallyPoint in connecting service members. Also, it appears that each service has their own login specifically designed for each branch.

Though I am not an expert or advocate for the site, I would like to hear feedback regarding the site and point out one feature that I noticed called, "The Shadow Box Poster Print."

From the site: We are now able to offer our Members an opportunity to order a high quality 18" wide poster print of your Profile Page Shadow Box you can frame and display at your home or office or provide as a keepsake to a family member(s). The cost is $24.95 + $6 USPO Priority Mail shipping.

The picture included on the site shows an impressive display of one service member's printable shadow box.

Thanks for your responses in advance!
Posted in these groups: Social media logo Social Media79b22c82 Connections367b27bf Forums
Avatar feed
Responses: 27
SFC Network Engineer
12
12
0
I am a member. I almost never go there. The site had promise initially, but as others mentioned, there are two things going against it: 1) you can't link to other branches of the military and 2) you have to pay for the extra content.

Most of the guys that I knew on that site, also don't seem to be very active, if at all.

I find RP is much more entertaining, and I appreciate that the community is free.

I would like to see an employer forum or something where I could connect with potential employers (and vice-versa), and where employers could post veteran specific jobs (as in, an employer is looking specifically to fill a position with a veteran or military member) and also where they could post just jobs in general that might be a good fit for veterans.

Other than that, I think RP rocks!
(12)
Comment
(0)
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
If you did that, either we'd have to clean up the conversations or limit what potential employers could see. lol
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Network Engineer
SFC (Join to see)
10 y
SSG (Join to see): Not necessarily. If the employer section was "fenced off" so that it couldn't see the actual member's portion, and could only see what members allowed them to see, then I don't think it would be that big of an issue.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Aircraft Mechanic
SSG (Join to see)
10 y
I do like the potential behind the idea. I think that the problem a lot of people have these days is that they just feel like a number. I think if it was the employers that were actively doing the looking then it might motivate people a little more and make them feel a little more important.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen C.
8
8
0
Edited >1 y ago
MAJ (Join to see) and MSG David Johnson, I like Together We Served (TWS) and have a profile there. However, I've discovered that RallyPoint and TWS are totally different animals. We're here on RP now and you can see what it does. To me, TWS is truly more of a "look back" site as it allows you to chronicle your service, and very accurately, I might add. It has a Reflections section, which allows you to speak of your service past in a free form manner. It also has a Sitrep (public message) feature and a private message feature. It also has a blog feature. Having said all that, it's simply not as interactive and does not promote the communications and connectivity as does RP. There are simply no discussions as there are here. BTW, you can "guest" from one service to another, so don't consider that a hindrance. TWS has an excellent volunteer team, and they've done a good job of eliminating posers, but some of those types will always slip through.
As far as the Shadow Box goes, it's only going to be as good as the profile you create. As for the man in the photo, I know him and he was one serious soldier.
The two sites are just different.
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS CSM Charles Hayden
(8)
Comment
(0)
MSG David Johnson
MSG David Johnson
10 y
I was a TWS volunteer for a bit while I had extra time, I'm also an admin for several unit pages, and some of my TF's fallen Soldiers. But I see your point, and was happy to find RP. I check back every so often, and still have an active email so I still get messages.
(5)
Reply
(0)
CDR Director, U.S. Navy Police
CDR (Join to see)
>1 y
I agree with LTC Curlee; the two sites are for completely different purposes. That said, I like TWS and paid my $99 to become a life member and don't regret it one bit. The people I've reconnected with from past duty stations has been worth it.

To all the comments indicating it's only service specific, the site now allows to you to browse other service sites, view their profiles, and even make folks from other services your contacts (Shipmates, as the Navy version calls them).

++ for both sites.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG(P) First Sergeant
8
8
0
I'm not a member of that site, so I've no insight into using it. However, two interesting aspects are the ability to develop online unit histories and individual photo albums.
(8)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
SSgt (Join to see)
10 y
The site is valuable in it's own right. It helps develop an image of your service and find people you may not find even here or Linkedin.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Together We Served, what are your thoughts?
SSgt Network Engineer
7
7
0
Edited 10 y ago
I feel about the same as you PFC Kenneth Koepke. I hated not being able to link my profiles together for different services. I also wasn't crazy about paying to be a member as well. I noticed there wasn't many active duty personnel on there as well who actively log in.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad
5
5
0
Edited 10 y ago
10382823 1446535312276635 6838963760782372583 n
I think RP is a MUCH better site for personal and professional interaction, but I do maintain a presence on the TWS-Marines site.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Greg Bruorton
SFC Greg Bruorton
7 y
That's an impressive shadow box, Gunny! Thanks for sharing.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Corey Ferretti
5
5
0
I was on there i did not care for it. it seemed to me you could only connect and chat with people you know so to me it was military Facebook. At least on here i can get feedback from people from different services and pay grades. With in a week here i saw more activity and discussions going on then in the month i was us together we served
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
5
5
0
I am there MAJ (Join to see) ! I am a historian there. Just lost a good friend!
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG David Johnson
4
4
0
It's ironic that I just posted a topic with the same site. I didn't realize there was already an active discussion about the site.
(4)
Comment
(0)
MSG David Johnson
MSG David Johnson
10 y
One of the admins merged my separate question with this thread due to them being about the same thing, I'm glad they are keeping an eye on here.
In the future I will definitely check for a common thread
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Electrical Power Production
3
3
0
I am a member but never use it. In my opinion RP is a much better site and has more for members. So I'm pretty bias now toward RP.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Joshua Copeland
3
3
0
I was an admin when the AF site first came online. Keyword being was.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close