Posted on Jun 16, 2015
Sikh Wins Court Case To Join ROTC: Is this a victory for religious freedom or did the court go too far?
279K
1.82K
774
33
32
1
A Federal Judge has ruled that Iknoor Singh's adherence to his Sikh faith - wearing facial hair, keeping his hair long, but wrapped in a turban, and carrying a sharp knife on his person - would not diminish his capacity to serve the nation he loves, the United States of America, as a future Officer in the United States Army. Do you feel too many allowances are being made for his faith or do you feel he should be welcomed into the ranks if he can successfully fulfill the requirements for Commissioning? What say you, RP?
--
(Note: Full article added by RP Staff.)
MINEOLA, NY — A Sikh college student from New York said Monday he is excited about a federal court decision that will permit him to enroll in the U.S. Army's Reserve Officer Training Corps without shaving his beard, cutting his hair, or removing his turban.
U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the ruling Friday in Washington, D.C., saying 20-year-old Iknoor Singh's adherence to his religious beliefs would not diminish his ability to serve in the military.
"I didn't believe it at first when I heard about the decision," said Singh, who lives in the New York City borough of Queens.
He told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Monday: "It was kind of surreal. This is something I have been fighting for for two or three years. I'm excited and nervous; very excited to learn."
Singh, who will be a junior next fall studying finance and business analytics at Hofstra University on Long Island, said he has had a lifelong interest in public service. He speaks four languages — English, Punjabi, Hindi, and Urdu — and he said he wants to work in military intelligence.
"Becoming an officer is not an easy thing," he conceded. "You have to be proficient in many areas."
Sikhism, a 500-year-old religion founded in India, requires its male followers to wear a turban and beard and keep their hair uncut.
Under a policy announced last year, troops can seek waivers on a case-by-case basis to wear religious clothing, seek prayer time or engage in religious practices. Approval depends on where the service member is stationed and whether the change would affect military readiness or the mission.
Currently, only a few Sikhs serve in the U.S. Army who have been granted religious accommodations.
In her ruling, Jackson said, "It is difficult to see how accommodating plaintiff's religious exercise would do greater damage to the Army's compelling interests in uniformity, discipline, credibility, unit cohesion, and training than the tens of thousands of medical shaving profiles the Army has already granted."
Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Ben Garrett, said in a statement the decision is currently being examined. "The Army takes pride in sustaining a culture where all personnel are treated with dignity and respect and not discriminated against based on race, color, religion, gender and national origin," he said.
Hofstra spokeswoman Karla Schuster said in a statement that the university "supports Mr. Singh's desire to serve his country, as well as his right to religious expression and practice. We are pleased that the courts have affirmed that he can do both as a member of the ROTC."
Gurjot Kaur, senior staff attorney for the Sikh Coalition, said the decision was "an important victory in the fight for religious freedom. We urge the Pentagon to eliminate the discriminatory loopholes in its policies and give all Americans an equal opportunity to serve in our nation's armed forces."
The American Civil Liberties Union and a group called United Sikhs jointly represented Singh in the case.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/sikh-student-queens-clear-join-army-rotc-article-1.2259423
--
(Note: Full article added by RP Staff.)
MINEOLA, NY — A Sikh college student from New York said Monday he is excited about a federal court decision that will permit him to enroll in the U.S. Army's Reserve Officer Training Corps without shaving his beard, cutting his hair, or removing his turban.
U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the ruling Friday in Washington, D.C., saying 20-year-old Iknoor Singh's adherence to his religious beliefs would not diminish his ability to serve in the military.
"I didn't believe it at first when I heard about the decision," said Singh, who lives in the New York City borough of Queens.
He told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Monday: "It was kind of surreal. This is something I have been fighting for for two or three years. I'm excited and nervous; very excited to learn."
Singh, who will be a junior next fall studying finance and business analytics at Hofstra University on Long Island, said he has had a lifelong interest in public service. He speaks four languages — English, Punjabi, Hindi, and Urdu — and he said he wants to work in military intelligence.
"Becoming an officer is not an easy thing," he conceded. "You have to be proficient in many areas."
Sikhism, a 500-year-old religion founded in India, requires its male followers to wear a turban and beard and keep their hair uncut.
Under a policy announced last year, troops can seek waivers on a case-by-case basis to wear religious clothing, seek prayer time or engage in religious practices. Approval depends on where the service member is stationed and whether the change would affect military readiness or the mission.
Currently, only a few Sikhs serve in the U.S. Army who have been granted religious accommodations.
In her ruling, Jackson said, "It is difficult to see how accommodating plaintiff's religious exercise would do greater damage to the Army's compelling interests in uniformity, discipline, credibility, unit cohesion, and training than the tens of thousands of medical shaving profiles the Army has already granted."
Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Ben Garrett, said in a statement the decision is currently being examined. "The Army takes pride in sustaining a culture where all personnel are treated with dignity and respect and not discriminated against based on race, color, religion, gender and national origin," he said.
Hofstra spokeswoman Karla Schuster said in a statement that the university "supports Mr. Singh's desire to serve his country, as well as his right to religious expression and practice. We are pleased that the courts have affirmed that he can do both as a member of the ROTC."
Gurjot Kaur, senior staff attorney for the Sikh Coalition, said the decision was "an important victory in the fight for religious freedom. We urge the Pentagon to eliminate the discriminatory loopholes in its policies and give all Americans an equal opportunity to serve in our nation's armed forces."
The American Civil Liberties Union and a group called United Sikhs jointly represented Singh in the case.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/sikh-student-queens-clear-join-army-rotc-article-1.2259423
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 282
I know that, in AIT, there was an individual that walked around with either an ACU-patterned or olive drab turban on. My PLT Sergeants said that he was the only guy in the US Military to wear one. Honestly, I think that he was a foreign service member (as I was trained on Fort Huachuca; there were a lot of foreign officers being trained there) but this exception has been made before regardless.
(0)
(0)
SSG Steven Gross
Having been an instructor at Redstone Arsenal, Al. , We had 3 or 4 Sikhs in turbans and full beards. Very loyal to the US Military.... and good natured also. This was '92-93 and also '86....
(0)
(0)
On any given deployment it seems like they extend the policy allowing anyone supporting any type of special ops to grow facial hair - culture shock if you arent used to it.
(0)
(0)
Simply put, this judge is a F_ _ _nut!! My religion states I need to smoke weed and eat potato chips and ice cream all day, I should still be allowed in despite my unsat, nasty, fat self that is way out of shape. Not all soldiers can guard the tomb of the unknowns. Not all Marines can serve on embassy duty or perform in the silent drill team at 8th and I. Not all sailors can be seals. WHY? Because there are requirements, that's why. This judge should have to kneel in the corner with her law books over her head saying, " I won't be stupid anymore" She needs to do this until I get tired of watching her or I finish eating my ice cream, whichever comes first.
(0)
(0)
I am Austrian born my brother Indian & our wives also from out USA both parents & step parents were essentially spooks for US Gov. so I have been exposed to various military forces / religions & cultures etc.... The Sikh is one group that I believe should be granted the waiver especially if they wished to be actual combatant positions.
The waiver would allow a group that due to religion is extremely well suited for the military and unlike Islam that has specific tenant that makes Islam untenable with the US Constitution & Bill of rights and therefore anti-American.
Look at their History from formation of 1st regiment 1 Aug 1846 thru WWII then 1990's early 2000's they were essentially dropped from British Military however now the British Military is considering bringing them back in despite the waiver needed for knife & hair/turban because they are an asset. { they are like the Spartan they will take on totally untenable odds such as 21 Sikhs in Spartan style again 10,000 Afghans solders {Battle of Saragarhi} for the British.
Do not know if there are enough Sikhs in the USA wanting to join to make even a full company but because of their attitude / culture I would like to see an entire regiment of Sikh and in battle would definitely like to have one my side next to me.
The waiver would allow a group that due to religion is extremely well suited for the military and unlike Islam that has specific tenant that makes Islam untenable with the US Constitution & Bill of rights and therefore anti-American.
Look at their History from formation of 1st regiment 1 Aug 1846 thru WWII then 1990's early 2000's they were essentially dropped from British Military however now the British Military is considering bringing them back in despite the waiver needed for knife & hair/turban because they are an asset. { they are like the Spartan they will take on totally untenable odds such as 21 Sikhs in Spartan style again 10,000 Afghans solders {Battle of Saragarhi} for the British.
Do not know if there are enough Sikhs in the USA wanting to join to make even a full company but because of their attitude / culture I would like to see an entire regiment of Sikh and in battle would definitely like to have one my side next to me.
(0)
(0)
LCpl Todd Houston
Yea, well, I don't give a damn. If this guy is such hot potatoes, then maybe we should just drop him in by himself and we don't have to even look at his nasty ass. The U.S. military is a team effort, not every man for himself. Before you start spouting how ignorant I am think of this.....we have done just fine without him so far. Besides, Austria right? I do believe that Austria is 0 and 2. Sorry, the door was open. If the Brits want him, we can send him there. Their biggest success was Dunkirk..............when they were running for their lives. You are in the military. You understand that America loves to simply throw tons of money at everything, like that is always the answer. Fact is, we usually get it right, but only after screwing it up a thousand times first. But hey, if we can save lives by spending money like mad, get in line ! Our biggest mistake is selling our hard earned, expensive gear to the rest of the world, even our "friends". Who, of coarse sell it to our enemies. Go figure.
(0)
(0)
The British have had Sikhs serve for over a 100 years. They figured out how to be inclusive so why can't we?
(0)
(0)
If he is allowed and this transfers to active duty then yes, it would cause some problems with some of the protective gear that is worn. As far as the knife, if it is within current law to wear it then I see no problem.
(0)
(0)
So because he is not Jewish you guys and girls are throwing a fit? Hey major why don't you make an article about Jewish serving the u.s army and yet they get to wear haneka? Well you are sir are racist and I'm not afraid to call someone on it. Tip my hat for you hero
(0)
(0)
Read This Next