Posted on Mar 15, 2015
Oops I think I may have offended a few people.
5.28K
1
2
0
0
0
There was an article posted on LinkedIn that was, at least in the way I interpreted it, telling civilian employers that they should modify their application process, hiring procedures and even orientation process to fit the needs of transitioning veterans.
My answer was, that while I am all in on any programs that enable us to adapt to the civilian sector, it is our job to adapt not that of a potential employer. I understand that we have all made sacrifices to do what we do, but we did in fact volunteer to do it. I don't feel this entitles us to some sort of advantage. We deserve nothing more than the chance to compete for a position we are qualified for. What are your thoughts?
My answer was, that while I am all in on any programs that enable us to adapt to the civilian sector, it is our job to adapt not that of a potential employer. I understand that we have all made sacrifices to do what we do, but we did in fact volunteer to do it. I don't feel this entitles us to some sort of advantage. We deserve nothing more than the chance to compete for a position we are qualified for. What are your thoughts?
Posted in these groups: 
Transition
Transition
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
Without the context provided by the original article, I would have to agree with CPT (Join to see). If it makes fiscal sense, and helps a company or industry target a specific type of employee that there is an identified need for, what reason is there to not do it?
You put out bait for the animal you want. You don't demand that deer starting eating sushi just because that's what you're using.
You put out bait for the animal you want. You don't demand that deer starting eating sushi just because that's what you're using.
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
SFC Christopher Perry, can you post a link to the article you mention?
I want to agree with you (we're a society built on capitalism, not socialism) but if the reason for the article is that former SMs have some innate value that's better tapped if employers revise how they recruit talent, there may be some merit to it.
I want to agree with you (we're a society built on capitalism, not socialism) but if the reason for the article is that former SMs have some innate value that's better tapped if employers revise how they recruit talent, there may be some merit to it.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google