Posted on Nov 19, 2014
Military court weighing fate of condemned soldier. What Are Your Thoughts?
394K
3.4K
1.23K
80
79
1
From: Army Times
A former U.S. soldier sentenced to death for killing two fellow soldiers and injuring 14 others in an attack in Kuwait is pinning his hopes of staying alive on an argument jurors should have never seen his diary.
Attorneys for 43-year-old Hasan K. Akbar argued on Tuesday that the one-time sergeant's writings, which include details of how he converted to radical Islam, were so inflammatory, that without the proper context, jurors were most likely to focus on the most damaging parts while considering whether to impose a death sentence.
"They didn't present the information in any meaningful way," said Lt. Col. John Potter, a military lawyer arguing the case for Akbar before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in Washington.
Akbar was with the 326th Engineer Battalion of the 101st Airborne Division based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, when he was sentenced to death in 2005. He killed Army Capt. Christopher S. Seifert and Air Force Maj. Gregory L. Stone in Kuwait two years earlier during the early days of the Iraq war.
Prosecutors say he threw four hand grenades into tents as members of his division slept, then fired his rifle at soldiers in the ensuing chaos on March 23, 2003. A military jury at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, convicted Akbar and handed down the sentence. The military has not carried out an execution since 1961. Akbar is one of five ex-soldiers facing a death sentence, the only one for actions in the Iraq war.
Potter told the judges the defense failed to prepare witnesses and errantly let jurors see Akbar's diary, which contained multiple anti-American passages.
Potter said allowing the jury to read the diary "eviscerated the defense in any meaningful way."
"We think the diary, there's no tactical reason to submit the diary," Potter said.
In one entry dated Feb. 23, 2002, Akbar wrote that he believed staying in the Army would eventually lead him to prison.
"I had a premonition that if I re-enlisted I would find myself in jail. That is probably true because I already want to kill several of them," Akbar wrote of his fellow soldiers.
The judges hearing the case focused on how the diary fit into the rest of the defense strategy, asking whether attorneys did anything to put the passages in the context of Akbar's pre-military life or any mental issues he may have had.
Potter noted that the defense put on 38 minutes of mitigation evidence and argument and didn't present any testimony from his family to humanize him. Instead, the lawyers failed by letting jurors pick through the diary and focus on the passages that left their client in the worst possible light.
Prosecutors said Akbar's defense attorneys acted in his best interest to try and prevent a death sentence from being issued in one of the "most egregious offenses in modern military history." The defense attorneys focused on the most viable arguments and witnesses, Maj. Kenneth Borgnino said.
Prosecutors noted that much of Akbar's family likely wouldn't have made a good impression on the witness stand.
The judges did not indicate when a ruling would be issued.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/crime/2014/11/19/akbar-appeal-111914/19265341/
A former U.S. soldier sentenced to death for killing two fellow soldiers and injuring 14 others in an attack in Kuwait is pinning his hopes of staying alive on an argument jurors should have never seen his diary.
Attorneys for 43-year-old Hasan K. Akbar argued on Tuesday that the one-time sergeant's writings, which include details of how he converted to radical Islam, were so inflammatory, that without the proper context, jurors were most likely to focus on the most damaging parts while considering whether to impose a death sentence.
"They didn't present the information in any meaningful way," said Lt. Col. John Potter, a military lawyer arguing the case for Akbar before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in Washington.
Akbar was with the 326th Engineer Battalion of the 101st Airborne Division based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, when he was sentenced to death in 2005. He killed Army Capt. Christopher S. Seifert and Air Force Maj. Gregory L. Stone in Kuwait two years earlier during the early days of the Iraq war.
Prosecutors say he threw four hand grenades into tents as members of his division slept, then fired his rifle at soldiers in the ensuing chaos on March 23, 2003. A military jury at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, convicted Akbar and handed down the sentence. The military has not carried out an execution since 1961. Akbar is one of five ex-soldiers facing a death sentence, the only one for actions in the Iraq war.
Potter told the judges the defense failed to prepare witnesses and errantly let jurors see Akbar's diary, which contained multiple anti-American passages.
Potter said allowing the jury to read the diary "eviscerated the defense in any meaningful way."
"We think the diary, there's no tactical reason to submit the diary," Potter said.
In one entry dated Feb. 23, 2002, Akbar wrote that he believed staying in the Army would eventually lead him to prison.
"I had a premonition that if I re-enlisted I would find myself in jail. That is probably true because I already want to kill several of them," Akbar wrote of his fellow soldiers.
The judges hearing the case focused on how the diary fit into the rest of the defense strategy, asking whether attorneys did anything to put the passages in the context of Akbar's pre-military life or any mental issues he may have had.
Potter noted that the defense put on 38 minutes of mitigation evidence and argument and didn't present any testimony from his family to humanize him. Instead, the lawyers failed by letting jurors pick through the diary and focus on the passages that left their client in the worst possible light.
Prosecutors said Akbar's defense attorneys acted in his best interest to try and prevent a death sentence from being issued in one of the "most egregious offenses in modern military history." The defense attorneys focused on the most viable arguments and witnesses, Maj. Kenneth Borgnino said.
Prosecutors noted that much of Akbar's family likely wouldn't have made a good impression on the witness stand.
The judges did not indicate when a ruling would be issued.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/crime/2014/11/19/akbar-appeal-111914/19265341/
Death Penalty
Kuwait
UCMJ
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 487
2
2
0
Let the fellow soldiers and and family members of the victims take care of his ass! He should be taken out the same way he took out the 2 soldiers and tortured slowly for the 14 he injured. Eye for an eye. He's mo better than the terrorist we are fighting in the Middle East! No trial, no hearings, just death. And no need to spend taxpayers money on this terrorist. Enough was spent on his training and military pay!
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
can they drag him across a mile of sandpaper and rusty nails before water-boarding him with lemon juice and battery acid? Then finish off with death by stoning.... with the rocks thrown by surviving victims and families of the deceased?
(2)
(0)
SPC Alejandro Martinez
Ask geologists which rocks are the most grating. I'm sure they have a nice collection.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
2
0
IMHO, the diary is irrelevant...he should get the death penalty anyway. He killed two brothers and injured another 14 with the intent to kill them...that is more than enough to meet the criteria for the death penalty.
(2)
(0)
SSG Eddye Royal
We have not had a Firing Squad, since Tim, the OK Bomber, or the person that 4-5 from FT. Riley, KS. I was stationed in HHB 1-5 I have know Idea what has gotten in the mind of the soldiers these days, but "I WANT IT NOW" has got to stop. Going back to pre-85 that's when I went in is not quite the answer, when putting people in lockers, and etc.
(0)
(0)
SGT Artiesa Woods
SSG Eddye Royal Timothy McVeigh was actually put to death by lethal injection...Gary Gilmore, Ronnie Gardner and John Albert Taylor are the only three death row inmates to be killed by a firing squad in recent American history.
(0)
(0)
SSG Eddye Royal
Okay, all he talked to friends back at base that we hand in common, I did not know him or work team.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
I vote we give him a Bin Laden burial......If he is still alive when he goes out the aircraft, so much the better.....
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
SSG(P) (Join to see)
That's a lot of tax dollars being wasted letting him rot in prison, but I see what you mean, top. It's a bit of a double edged sword. You want the guy to pay the ultimate price for committing such atrocious acts, but at the same time, you want his suffering to be long and slow.
(0)
(0)
SFC Charles S.
Who cares if they are Martyr's. Less is better and justice is justice. Hanged or Firing Squad.
(1)
(0)
SFC Walt Dellinger
It's been proven to be less expensive to serve life than the death sentence, by the time the bleeding hearts get done with appeal after appeal, it costs more money.
(0)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google