Posted on Nov 11, 2016
SN Greg Wright
21.7K
87
70
14
14
0
Posted in these groups: Ucmj UCMJElection 2016 button Election 2016Photo JAG
Edited 8 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 29
SPC Joseph Ahner
0
0
0
Faithless electors are completely legal and the electoral college is not simply a rubber stamp on the popular vote. I fail to see any sort of improper conduct present.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Member
0
0
0
It's not something I've come across in the MCM before. What I know of politics and the military it should be ok, weird but ok. So long as the SM isn't doing it in uniform or making claims about the military. Though to be honest this could do with a bit of research for a full answer and even then my final word would be seek the advise of a JA.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
ENS Ansi Officer
0
0
0
No. Trump is not the President yet. He is an elect. Once Trump is the President, we can not speak badly of him. We are sworn to follow his orders as per our oath of enlistment.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC George Smith
0
0
0
most interesting...
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SMSgt Thor Merich
0
0
0
Great question. Too bad I don't know that answer. My guess is maybe or probably? It would depend if the SM is asking for some legal remedy or if they are advocating an illegal response. I know that there are a ton of rules in the UCMJ directing military members actions during elections.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Battalion S 1 Oic
0
0
0
Being stupid is not against the UCMJ, no.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
8 y
Good thing for my 4 year stint.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Battalion S 1 Oic
CPT (Join to see)
8 y
SSG Robert M. - Are you saying that I'm stupid, SSG?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Operations Intelligence
0
0
0
In my opinion it would depends on circumstances, how severe it is, ect. It may be contempt (Article 88) or perhaps fall under 134.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Trust Palmer
0
0
0
Really...
(0)
Comment
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
8 y
I dislike disappointing you, Trust, but SM's took an oath to the Constitution, and subjected themselves to the UCMJ. I take potential violations of either very seriously. What she's proposing is nothing less than sedition. It's dangerous, and is highly likely to result in death and destruction if it happens.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA Edward Vong
0
0
0
This is actually debatable as members who are serving did indeed pledge themselves to the Constitution.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
SSgt (Join to see)
8 y
Yes, but the Obama and Hillary monolith has destroyed the constitution or almost had. SrA Edward Vong
(1)
Reply
(0)
SrA Edward Vong
SrA Edward Vong
8 y
SSgt (Join to see) -
Not disagreeing with you on that one.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
Sgt Wayne Wood
8 y
SSgt (Join to see) - depending on which parts of the Constitution to which you are referring. Obama has done nothing explicitly contrary to the LETTER of the constitution. He has, however, run roughshod over the INTENT.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
8 y
The Constitution explicitly created the Electoral College system. They are our Representative Democracy who vote 12/19. This is no different than continuing a "campaign" until the last minute.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close