Posted on Aug 22, 2014
Feelings on displaying the Confederate flag on your POV or person while on a military installation?
362K
2.13K
959
111
111
0
Recently, I had a long and heated discussion with a fellow veteran about this issue. I don't know for sure whether a branch-specific reg or a DoD-wide reg exists that prohibits/allows personnel on a military installation to display the Confederate flag on their personal vehicle or on their person (e.g. a belt buckle). Maybe this is a base-specific policy and left to the judgment of the installation commander. Display of the Confederate flag is a divisive issue and people often feel really strongly one way or the other. But today, it is still a relevant topic and touches on other military leadership/discipline areas, including the actions of one member deeply offending another member -- regardless of whether said action is legal/authorized. That can create huge problems in a military unit, and this happened in a unit I personally served in. So, below are my questions for the RallyPoint community about this issue.
Please try to keep comments professional (don't attack one another) and explain your thoughts as best you can.
Questions:
(1) How do you feel about the Confederate flag being displayed on the vehicle/person of a service member if he/she is ON post? How does your opinion change if the member is OFF post?
(2) What does the Confederate flag symbolize to you personally? What do you think it can symbolize to other people around you who may perceive it differently?
(3) If you have personally experienced a military-related situation where a symbol/flag caused someone to be offended, what happened and what did you/would you have done as the leader?
I look fwd to everyone's thoughts on this. Personally, I have some strong feelings about this issue, though I don't want to bias people's answers upfront. Please be as honest as possible.
Tag: SSG Emily Williams Col (Join to see) 1SG Steven Stankovich SSG Scott Williams 1LT Sandy Annala CPT (Join to see) SSG V. Michelle Woods MSG Carl Cunningham
Please try to keep comments professional (don't attack one another) and explain your thoughts as best you can.
Questions:
(1) How do you feel about the Confederate flag being displayed on the vehicle/person of a service member if he/she is ON post? How does your opinion change if the member is OFF post?
(2) What does the Confederate flag symbolize to you personally? What do you think it can symbolize to other people around you who may perceive it differently?
(3) If you have personally experienced a military-related situation where a symbol/flag caused someone to be offended, what happened and what did you/would you have done as the leader?
I look fwd to everyone's thoughts on this. Personally, I have some strong feelings about this issue, though I don't want to bias people's answers upfront. Please be as honest as possible.
Tag: SSG Emily Williams Col (Join to see) 1SG Steven Stankovich SSG Scott Williams 1LT Sandy Annala CPT (Join to see) SSG V. Michelle Woods MSG Carl Cunningham
Edited 10 y ago
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 326
We have gotten to a point where displaying the American flag is offensive. Should we also hide the Stars and Stripes because people choose to be offended? I don't think so. Lets keep speech and expression free as long as it is not an overt threat.
(10)
(0)
1SG Harold Piet
I am entitled to my views and the opportunity to proclaim them, I am not entitled to mistreat anyone for theirs.
(2)
(0)
Sgt John Koliha
Sir, I am not offended, so for me your argument is unimportant. The issue is not about "giving offence." The issue is treason, sir. The Confederacy was formed as a treasonous endeavor, and its goal was to make war against the United States. Pure and simple.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Was it treason? Perhaps their principles were consistent with the Constitution? Unless specifically enumerated to the Federal government, all other governance was reserved to the States. The Confedaracy seceded because the Federal government usurped States' authority. So, I ask you this, where would the allegation of treason be more appropriately directed? Not so pure and simple as you may think.
It's purpose was not to make war. These states seceded. It was the Federals who waged war to keep the seceded states.
It's purpose was not to make war. These states seceded. It was the Federals who waged war to keep the seceded states.
(2)
(0)
I personally think the Confederate Flag should not be flown anywhere in the United States. To me it represents a group of traitors, who decided to leave the Union and become their own country. The seceeded, fought and lost a war. In losing they lost the right to fly the flag. If the South had won the Civil War would we be able to fly the US Flag?
Most Southeners say the flag represents a culture, but what culture does it represent? What in that culture brings pride, rolling cotton fields, forced labor, lynchings, segregation? What is it? Help me understand?
I personally am NOT offended by the Confederate flag as an African American, but I am offended by the Confederate flag and an American soldier who's country lost several brave men fighting to preserve the greatest nation in the world against domestic terrorists.....
Most Southeners say the flag represents a culture, but what culture does it represent? What in that culture brings pride, rolling cotton fields, forced labor, lynchings, segregation? What is it? Help me understand?
I personally am NOT offended by the Confederate flag as an African American, but I am offended by the Confederate flag and an American soldier who's country lost several brave men fighting to preserve the greatest nation in the world against domestic terrorists.....
(10)
(1)
LCDR (Join to see)
SFC, I've seen more racism and outright bigotry in New York and New Jersey than anywhere else in the United States. Down here, we had to pull our heads out of our asses - y'all's are still stuck up there - smugly thinking yourselves superior because our ancestors were worse than you are now.
I'm sorry if you're too stuck on your preconceived notions to realize that there's more to the south than your stereotypes. But, you know, if you're the type who clings to stereotypes, then that's on you, not on us.
I'm sorry if you're too stuck on your preconceived notions to realize that there's more to the south than your stereotypes. But, you know, if you're the type who clings to stereotypes, then that's on you, not on us.
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
CW2 Walker, ending Slavery had nothing to do with the start of the Civil War. In fact Lincoln had no intentions on freeing slaves pre-secession. The Civil War was caused by the South seceding from the Union because the Union didn't want to allow the expansion of slavery to newly acquired territories. Everyone is taught in school that Abraham Lincoln was the slaves knight in white armor when in fact the Emancipation Proclamation was a tool to weaken the South economically. There was never any talk of outlawing Slavery.
(3)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
LOL LT Miller, you should go into stand up comedy..... When you say my ancestors who are you referring to? My ancestors are from the South, but left because there is something unpleasant about ropes around the neck, bodies being set on fire and tied to train tracks.
(2)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
It also represents a part of our history that neither side should wish to forget. Many of our families killed each other. There is much history to be remembered from Europe leading to our founding, leading to that war. The problem with symbols and words is they can change. Most things in life aren't black and white, but we see it that way to make it easier for us. Remember the Continental Exchange, Industrialization, Northern and Southern conscription practices, Northern and Southern POW camps, sovereignty vs federation vs liberty, slavery vs property, saving the union and the banks and consolidating power into the executive. Burning Atlanta. Much to be lost and repeated. There were good causes and bad causes being backed on both sides.
As for traitors, the US committed treason to the crown once. Should we stop flying the Flag of the United Kingdom since they lost the war of 1812 and sold the south slaves? They still have a state of 4 nations, while the south has several "states" of many nations under our federation-cum-state. The US slaughtered and moved native peoples and usurped their lands, could that be taken negatively? The world I live in has many shades of grey.
As for traitors, the US committed treason to the crown once. Should we stop flying the Flag of the United Kingdom since they lost the war of 1812 and sold the south slaves? They still have a state of 4 nations, while the south has several "states" of many nations under our federation-cum-state. The US slaughtered and moved native peoples and usurped their lands, could that be taken negatively? The world I live in has many shades of grey.
(1)
(0)
Suspended Profile
CPT Aaron Kletzing. Historical note . . . there are three distinct flags displayed below . . .
(1) The Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia ( SQUARE )
(2) The Battle Flag of the Army of Tennessee ( RECTANGLE )
(3) The Stars and Bars
The Battle Flag of the Army of Tennessee is also known as the CONFEDERATE FLAG / Rebel Flag / Dixie Flag / Southern Cross . . . this may be disquieting to some and is the one flown most often.
Warmest Regards, Sandy
Source: http://www.moc.org/collections-archives/flags-confederacy
(1) The Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia ( SQUARE )
(2) The Battle Flag of the Army of Tennessee ( RECTANGLE )
(3) The Stars and Bars
The Battle Flag of the Army of Tennessee is also known as the CONFEDERATE FLAG / Rebel Flag / Dixie Flag / Southern Cross . . . this may be disquieting to some and is the one flown most often.
Warmest Regards, Sandy
Source: http://www.moc.org/collections-archives/flags-confederacy
I feel that the display of the Confederate States of America Flag is racist at worst, and to be perfectly frank, ignorant at best.
1. It is the symbol of the Confederate States of America - a briefly lived country that stood for the institution of slavery and the degradation of their fellow man - period. There is not talking around that point.
2. The Confederate States of America lost the civil war - why are we still flying the flag? It makes no more sense than someone flying a Nazi flag post WWII, which brings me to my next point -
3. It is a symbol of hate in most circles, and wildly offensive. The argument of southern pride is a bogus one - as is the notion that the war itself was over states rights. We are Americans, and as such only have one flag that represents our great nation.
4. It is your First Amendment right to display it - however that right does not extend to military installations - it is contrary to good order and discipline in every sense.
Historical trivia and footnotes aside - you have to accept it for what is has become over the last 150 years - a symbol of division, hate, and ignorance.
1. It is the symbol of the Confederate States of America - a briefly lived country that stood for the institution of slavery and the degradation of their fellow man - period. There is not talking around that point.
2. The Confederate States of America lost the civil war - why are we still flying the flag? It makes no more sense than someone flying a Nazi flag post WWII, which brings me to my next point -
3. It is a symbol of hate in most circles, and wildly offensive. The argument of southern pride is a bogus one - as is the notion that the war itself was over states rights. We are Americans, and as such only have one flag that represents our great nation.
4. It is your First Amendment right to display it - however that right does not extend to military installations - it is contrary to good order and discipline in every sense.
Historical trivia and footnotes aside - you have to accept it for what is has become over the last 150 years - a symbol of division, hate, and ignorance.
(8)
(0)
CPO Rick Felty
Southerners understand Capt. Hamilton , you are a Yaankee from the north. "YALL DON'T UNDERSTAND IT IS A SOUTHERN. THANG " if you haven't been from the south keep you. Northern. Comments to yourself. Your Northern. Politicians. At the time. Including Lincoln had slaves, knock on. Thier door first.
(1)
(0)
PO3 Shaun Taylor
When I first became aware of the confederate flag I used to view it as something positive. I mean after all it was painted on the top of the General Lee in the tv show Dukes of Hazzard. The Dukes were always doing something positive so that's how I viewed the flag. I was later taught in school that it represented the civil war and was viewed as a symbol of hate. The fact that the KKK had it sewn in their sheets reinforced that point. I just don't think it's enough for it to be banned because if that's the case we would have to ban the American flag as well the KKK also display that flag on their sheets. I truly believe that some people are just expressing their southern pride when they display it. I've seen black people display it as well. So just to assume somebody is racist for displaying it is being racist.
(3)
(0)
MAJ George Hamilton
I agree that making the immediate assumption that someone is racist for displaying it is racist in itself. I am also not implying that we should ban it - that is a violation of our First Amendment rights as citizens.
The point that I am trying to make over the course of multiple posts here (and apparently failing miserably) is this -
Perception is 99% of reality - whether you like it or not, and whether or not it's correct.
When people see the CSA Naval Jack, it is most commonly associated with the Civil War, slavery, the emblem of white supremacist groups and all the negative stereotypes things that come with the south. It may be viewed as nothing more than southern pride by those that live there (I did live in Oklahoma and Texas for a combined 9 years, so I have a little bit of insight into how things work in that part of the world), but the flag is most often associated with the negative aspects it represents when seen outside of the southern United States. That statement does not mean that I think you are immediately
That is my opinion - which is informed by 9 years of living in the south, and another 23 living in all other regions of the country - as well as a decade on active duty in the Army and seeing the reactions to it across multiple formations.
The point that I am trying to make over the course of multiple posts here (and apparently failing miserably) is this -
Perception is 99% of reality - whether you like it or not, and whether or not it's correct.
When people see the CSA Naval Jack, it is most commonly associated with the Civil War, slavery, the emblem of white supremacist groups and all the negative stereotypes things that come with the south. It may be viewed as nothing more than southern pride by those that live there (I did live in Oklahoma and Texas for a combined 9 years, so I have a little bit of insight into how things work in that part of the world), but the flag is most often associated with the negative aspects it represents when seen outside of the southern United States. That statement does not mean that I think you are immediately
That is my opinion - which is informed by 9 years of living in the south, and another 23 living in all other regions of the country - as well as a decade on active duty in the Army and seeing the reactions to it across multiple formations.
(2)
(0)
PO3 Shaun Taylor
I get your point,I even agree with your with comment about perception. I respect your opinion as well as anyone else who expresses theirs in the positive manner in which you have. In my opinion education has a lot to do with it. I'm not talking about the quality of education I'm talking about the things that are being taught about the confederate flag in the north versus what they teach in the south.
(1)
(0)
The movie "Gone With the Wind" creatred this romantic picture of the Confederacy. Hate groups adopted the Confederate battle flag (more specifically the Confederate Naval Jack as a symbol of their movement. I can fulliy appreciate how African American as well as anyone who has been targeted by these hate groups will find the Stars and Bars offensive.
Supporters say it is "pride and not hate". Opponents find it offenive and hateful.
I consider myself a student of history. I love it and soak it up where ever I can find it. My family fought for the Confederacy, they were not slave owners. They were poor dirt farmers - one step above a slave on the social ladder who were conscripted into the army. I say this becuase it is history and we should all know our histories.
That being said all the Confederate flags need to be furled and returned to the museums. We need to educate on all the causes of the War Between the States and the post war era. We need to educate the causes of Jim Crow, Seperate but Equal and the Civil Rights Era. We need to educate why certain symbols are offensive. (I find the clenched fist of the Black Panther Party offensive).
Kind of a rant on my part but I believe that if a symbol is disruptive to good order and discipline it should be removed.
Supporters say it is "pride and not hate". Opponents find it offenive and hateful.
I consider myself a student of history. I love it and soak it up where ever I can find it. My family fought for the Confederacy, they were not slave owners. They were poor dirt farmers - one step above a slave on the social ladder who were conscripted into the army. I say this becuase it is history and we should all know our histories.
That being said all the Confederate flags need to be furled and returned to the museums. We need to educate on all the causes of the War Between the States and the post war era. We need to educate the causes of Jim Crow, Seperate but Equal and the Civil Rights Era. We need to educate why certain symbols are offensive. (I find the clenched fist of the Black Panther Party offensive).
Kind of a rant on my part but I believe that if a symbol is disruptive to good order and discipline it should be removed.
(8)
(0)
SSG Tim Everett
What is this "y'all" and "us" stuff? You're both Americans, you're both wearing a military uniform, you're both serving under the same flag. Neither one of you was alive during the American Civil War, neither of you owned slaves, neither of you was an abolitionist. In fact I daresay neither of your great grandfathers were even born when there was a nation called Confederate States of America.
(2)
(0)
SFC Mark Merino
I watched Dukes of Hazzard as a kid......to watch Daisy. Does that make me a racist sexist? I prefer to continue to move forward.
(4)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
SSG the "y'all and us stuff" is called heritage, which some of us care about. You can say that we're all American, and that's fine. But I am also a southerner, and a proud Virginian. If you don't like that, then you're the one with a problem; not me.
(1)
(0)
"(1) How do you feel about the Confederate flag being displayed on the vehicle/person of a service member if he/she is ON post? How does your opinion change if the member is OFF post?"
I don't think it's something a commander should consider banning on a vehicle, as long as it's privately owned. I think it's unprofessional to have it on a vehicle, but it is protected as freedom of expression in a public place.
On your person in public, same thing, as long as you are not on duty (said mostly for the sake of civilians and contractors, since military will usually be in uniform). On duty, however, I think it's not just permissible but appropriate to say that it doesn't belong.
To me, these both apply on and off post. Again, freedom of expression means also the freedom to express horrible, reprehensible ideas. Others can choose to respond/act differently toward you based on that expression, as is also their right.
"(2) What does the Confederate flag symbolize to you personally? What do you think it can symbolize to other people around you who may perceive it differently?"
This may be unpopular here, but I'll just come out and say it:
It's a symbol of treason, secession, and slavery. Period.
I really don't see a way around that. It was the chosen banner of the movement that decided that the forced servitude of an entire race was more important than upholding your duty. The South's greatest "heroes," such as Lee, were traitors to their country, and since they took an oath as military members which they violated with their desertion, it is not a negotiable factor.
Yes, I know some people go on about "southern heritage," but outside of southern cuisine, there isn't a single piece of that "heritage" that doesn't ultimately trace back to treason, secession, slavery, and a sense of pride in those qualities.
And I know there are others who will ultimately say the real issue was "state's rights," to which I would ask, which ones? What did the traitors who formed the confederacy *say* was their rationale? Luckily, we don't have to guess, as they wrote it in their letters, and their statements of secession, and in their new state constitutions: slavery.
For what it's worth, I *don't* think that everyone brandishing the symbol is a bigot or a racist or a traitor. I think a lot of people have convinced themselves that the symbol means something different. Unfortunately for them, they are wrong.
"(3) If you have personally experienced a military-related situation where a symbol/flag caused someone to be offended, what happened and what did you/would you have done as the leader?"
I see confederate flags and Gadsden flags on cars almost every day at work. I've never seen anyone post up such stuff in the office, or wear clothing depicting it within the office (even off duty).
The only controversial symbols I've seen have been religious ones, and they've always in the cases I've been around been resolved amicably. I honestly don't know how I'd respond if it wasn't peacefully resolved right away, as I think each case may have too many unique circumstances to make a broad statement about how to act.
I don't think it's something a commander should consider banning on a vehicle, as long as it's privately owned. I think it's unprofessional to have it on a vehicle, but it is protected as freedom of expression in a public place.
On your person in public, same thing, as long as you are not on duty (said mostly for the sake of civilians and contractors, since military will usually be in uniform). On duty, however, I think it's not just permissible but appropriate to say that it doesn't belong.
To me, these both apply on and off post. Again, freedom of expression means also the freedom to express horrible, reprehensible ideas. Others can choose to respond/act differently toward you based on that expression, as is also their right.
"(2) What does the Confederate flag symbolize to you personally? What do you think it can symbolize to other people around you who may perceive it differently?"
This may be unpopular here, but I'll just come out and say it:
It's a symbol of treason, secession, and slavery. Period.
I really don't see a way around that. It was the chosen banner of the movement that decided that the forced servitude of an entire race was more important than upholding your duty. The South's greatest "heroes," such as Lee, were traitors to their country, and since they took an oath as military members which they violated with their desertion, it is not a negotiable factor.
Yes, I know some people go on about "southern heritage," but outside of southern cuisine, there isn't a single piece of that "heritage" that doesn't ultimately trace back to treason, secession, slavery, and a sense of pride in those qualities.
And I know there are others who will ultimately say the real issue was "state's rights," to which I would ask, which ones? What did the traitors who formed the confederacy *say* was their rationale? Luckily, we don't have to guess, as they wrote it in their letters, and their statements of secession, and in their new state constitutions: slavery.
For what it's worth, I *don't* think that everyone brandishing the symbol is a bigot or a racist or a traitor. I think a lot of people have convinced themselves that the symbol means something different. Unfortunately for them, they are wrong.
"(3) If you have personally experienced a military-related situation where a symbol/flag caused someone to be offended, what happened and what did you/would you have done as the leader?"
I see confederate flags and Gadsden flags on cars almost every day at work. I've never seen anyone post up such stuff in the office, or wear clothing depicting it within the office (even off duty).
The only controversial symbols I've seen have been religious ones, and they've always in the cases I've been around been resolved amicably. I honestly don't know how I'd respond if it wasn't peacefully resolved right away, as I think each case may have too many unique circumstances to make a broad statement about how to act.
(9)
(1)
Once again so long as you are extending this ban to ALL flags which might offend someone.
We live in an interesting time: everyone speaks of being politically correct but the rules ONLY apply to a few. All rules must be equally enforceable with respect to all groups. Consider; an Irish Decedent might be offended by the Union Jack, a Armenian by a Turkish Flag, a Ukrainian, Polish, Georgian by a Russian Flag, a Palestinian by the Israeli Flag and vice versa, etc. I might be offended every time I see a New York Yankees Sticker (as rightfully anyone should be). Where will you draw the line? There will be or should not be exceptions or sacred cows that escape in order to be "PC". Ban them all to protect everyone as equal under the law or leave it alone, allow personal choice and freedom and make everyone act tolerantly.
We live in an interesting time: everyone speaks of being politically correct but the rules ONLY apply to a few. All rules must be equally enforceable with respect to all groups. Consider; an Irish Decedent might be offended by the Union Jack, a Armenian by a Turkish Flag, a Ukrainian, Polish, Georgian by a Russian Flag, a Palestinian by the Israeli Flag and vice versa, etc. I might be offended every time I see a New York Yankees Sticker (as rightfully anyone should be). Where will you draw the line? There will be or should not be exceptions or sacred cows that escape in order to be "PC". Ban them all to protect everyone as equal under the law or leave it alone, allow personal choice and freedom and make everyone act tolerantly.
(7)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Due to the extreme PC on this issue I would say in good taste to support all opinions no do not enter or have visually displayed most would find it offensive in this day and age regardless of it historical and policitical message
(0)
(0)
Sgt John Koliha
None of your examples have to do with TREASON against the United States. Nice try to divert the discussion.
(1)
(0)
PO2 Jerome O'Neil
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort."
It's not political correctness to take offense at some yahoo waving around the flag of traitors that killed loyal US soldiers. It's what patriotic Americans should do.
It's not political correctness to take offense at some yahoo waving around the flag of traitors that killed loyal US soldiers. It's what patriotic Americans should do.
(0)
(0)
My 2 cents:
From my observations, many people north and south of the Mason Dixon line use the flag as a symbol of rebellion not necessarily related to the Civil War. Yes the flag is deep rooted in southern history and those that are the staunchest supporters of its symbology seem to be predominantly from the south. Elements of the flag design are currently incorporated into state flags and that is allowed to legally stand. That being said, I don't think a post commander has the authority to ban the public display of the Confederate flag. It is technically no longer the flag of a foreign country more of a symbol of rebellious and/or southern pride.
Now if PFC Johnny Reb and PFC Billy Yank are sharing quarters and the display of the flag becomes disruptive to good order and discipline, then I believe the local commander should have the right to resolve the issue to include asking the soldier to remove the flag, just as if it were something morally or racially sensitive and/or offensive.
From my observations, many people north and south of the Mason Dixon line use the flag as a symbol of rebellion not necessarily related to the Civil War. Yes the flag is deep rooted in southern history and those that are the staunchest supporters of its symbology seem to be predominantly from the south. Elements of the flag design are currently incorporated into state flags and that is allowed to legally stand. That being said, I don't think a post commander has the authority to ban the public display of the Confederate flag. It is technically no longer the flag of a foreign country more of a symbol of rebellious and/or southern pride.
Now if PFC Johnny Reb and PFC Billy Yank are sharing quarters and the display of the flag becomes disruptive to good order and discipline, then I believe the local commander should have the right to resolve the issue to include asking the soldier to remove the flag, just as if it were something morally or racially sensitive and/or offensive.
(7)
(0)
SGT Steve Oakes
SFC Hunnell I think you are right on point here. As for others saying the flag can be banned for disrupting ( good order and discipline). I say BULL. If good order and discipline can be maintained in the face of enemy fire, under the threat of IEDs, and in the hostile climates of the Middle East. Then it can be maintained in view of a flag!
(1)
(0)
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
I have no issue with people flying the former battle flag. I don't think the "flag of the south" makes anyone bad or evil SFC Kenneth Hunnell & SGT Steve Oakes, but I do believe that in certain circles there is still some contention over what the flag may represent.
(3)
(0)
CPT Ahmed Faried
To each his own. If I know two individuals and one flies the flag I will steer clear of the one that flies it. You can't be willfully ignorant of the history it represents.
(1)
(0)
I have dealt with this issue since my days as a HS in NJ, in the NY Metro Area. As a company commander, as TAC at West Point, as BN and BDE Commander, and now a HS teacher in Missouri.
Symbols (which this is) mean different things to different people. In NJ, it means/meant a redneck and racist hatred. Here redneck is considered to be in vogue.
In my view, this flag, symbol, etc, should never be displayed anywhere... let alone on a military members clothing, skin, or vehicle. Regardless of what non-racist things they may state it means... for far too many Americans this symbol means nothing but evil and hatred.
To me, displaying it is simply insensitive at best.
Symbols (which this is) mean different things to different people. In NJ, it means/meant a redneck and racist hatred. Here redneck is considered to be in vogue.
In my view, this flag, symbol, etc, should never be displayed anywhere... let alone on a military members clothing, skin, or vehicle. Regardless of what non-racist things they may state it means... for far too many Americans this symbol means nothing but evil and hatred.
To me, displaying it is simply insensitive at best.
(5)
(0)
Lt Col Harry Clawson
One of the best short answers on here Col. Insensitive and devisive at best. Doesn't make sense to display it on base. Don't like the idea of off base either if you have anything showing you're in the military. I am a Yankee by background and I have many southern friends who have a different perspective because of ancestors that fought for the confederacy but I hope I would feel the same way. To me, it's always been black and white. No matter the excuses give about how our founding fathers were slave owners(some) and the U.S. Flag stood for slavery for 87 years, and it was about states rights etc etc, I never bought it. The U.S. (North) won and ended slavery with both the emancipation proclamation and the 13, 14 and 15 amendments. If that flag(rebel) had won -- let's face it, slavery would have continued. It's just that simple. Slavery was haineous and I don't what that flag to be associated with anything in our military or government. Yes it's part of history and today we are all Americans better because it was defeated. I honor our flag and Christ -- and the rest can have a museum and if we are honest, a thank God rebellion lost and slavery ended forever.
(0)
(0)
COL Charles Williams
Lt Col Harry Clawson - It is/was always interesting to me, as in the north east, no cares about remembering the civil war or anything about it. You never hear things like the North will rise again... Or, the North will kick your ass again... But, this seems to be a more emotional issues and close to many from Souther States. I don't get it, as none of us were around then... I am tired of the rationalizations and explanations.
(0)
(0)
Like most of us, I love my military history. I always saw the stars and bars as a chapter in our history. The display of this flag does not mean that you are a racist or advocate separating from this great nation. I'm also aware that there is a strong correlation between certain hate groups and the use of that image. I promise you that haters are going to hate, regardless. Complex problems are fought by like a major campaign whittling them down to size battle after battle and skirmish after skirmish and sometimes over a span of decades/centuries. Racism is a perfect example. One of the skirmishes was displaying images. Somehow, the skirmish turned into it's own battle. In my opinion, the enemy (racism) created a distraction to get us to attack in the wrong direction. Making the stars and bars the symbol of racism means that about half of this nation are racists. All families who had relatives that proudly served the south are descendants of racists. Therefore, in the noble battle to fight racism, we succeeded to swell the ranks with fighters on both sides that previously had no interest to fight. My girlfriend is a Japanese national and lost relatives during WWII fighting relatives that we all lost. What does that make us?
(5)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
"Racism wasn't a north/south thing. It was an American thing."
I'm reminded of the part of the Holocaust Museum where, if I recall correctly, there are two doors, one labeled "Racist" and one labeled "Not Racist." The latter is locked, forcing you to go through the former. It obvious implication is that we all hold biases, both racial and otherwise, and it would be foolish to think we are immune. All we can do is remain aware and try actively to account for and combat our biases.
That said, some people *are* more biased than others, and the more biased they are the less likely they are to be proactive in dealing with it.
I'm reminded of the part of the Holocaust Museum where, if I recall correctly, there are two doors, one labeled "Racist" and one labeled "Not Racist." The latter is locked, forcing you to go through the former. It obvious implication is that we all hold biases, both racial and otherwise, and it would be foolish to think we are immune. All we can do is remain aware and try actively to account for and combat our biases.
That said, some people *are* more biased than others, and the more biased they are the less likely they are to be proactive in dealing with it.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
1LT(P) Michael Barden: "I find it interesting that folks on this board (not you) keep bringing up slavery (which the war wasn't about). Emancipation wasn't even on the table in 1861, so it wouldn't have been a catalyst for secession."
I find it interesting that folks on this board (including you) go so far out of their way to deny the historic facts of slavery's connection to the genesis and continuation of the war. I'd lead you to my earlier dismantling of that trope, but for simplicity's sake I'll post it again:
-- The 11 states that seceded did so between 20DEC1860 and 20MAY1861, a 5-month span. The attack on Ft. Sumter, generally considered the start of the war, was near the end of that span, on 12APR1861, and 7 of the states had already left by then.
-- 4 states laid out declarations of reasons when they seceded, all 4 of which were before Ft. Sumter. The only unified theme in all 4 was slavery. This is not a negotiable thing; you can look it up yourself.
-- Countless publications - newspapers, church bulletins, and political speeches - within all 11 states, made clear even before secession that the main issue was always slavery, and continued to reinforce that point throughout the war.
-- The confederate Vice President gave a speech in which he labeled slavery the "cornerstone" of the confederacy, and labeled it the "immediate cause" of secession. That was 21MAR1861, 2 months before Ft. Sumter.
So no, LT, it is an irredeemably incorrect thing to say that the war wasn't about slavery. Slavery was the single most prominent point! Even when talking about "state's rights," it was always about slavery *as* the major right in question, with any and all other rights considered as secondary issues (when they were mentioned at all).
You *don't* get to invent your own history just to avoid the harsh realities of the real thing.
I find it interesting that folks on this board (including you) go so far out of their way to deny the historic facts of slavery's connection to the genesis and continuation of the war. I'd lead you to my earlier dismantling of that trope, but for simplicity's sake I'll post it again:
-- The 11 states that seceded did so between 20DEC1860 and 20MAY1861, a 5-month span. The attack on Ft. Sumter, generally considered the start of the war, was near the end of that span, on 12APR1861, and 7 of the states had already left by then.
-- 4 states laid out declarations of reasons when they seceded, all 4 of which were before Ft. Sumter. The only unified theme in all 4 was slavery. This is not a negotiable thing; you can look it up yourself.
-- Countless publications - newspapers, church bulletins, and political speeches - within all 11 states, made clear even before secession that the main issue was always slavery, and continued to reinforce that point throughout the war.
-- The confederate Vice President gave a speech in which he labeled slavery the "cornerstone" of the confederacy, and labeled it the "immediate cause" of secession. That was 21MAR1861, 2 months before Ft. Sumter.
So no, LT, it is an irredeemably incorrect thing to say that the war wasn't about slavery. Slavery was the single most prominent point! Even when talking about "state's rights," it was always about slavery *as* the major right in question, with any and all other rights considered as secondary issues (when they were mentioned at all).
You *don't* get to invent your own history just to avoid the harsh realities of the real thing.
(3)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next