Posted on Aug 24, 2016
Does the Clinton Foundation Government Pay-to-Play scandal concern you?
4K
80
32
12
12
0
It concerns me. Giving special access to our government, to stars, athletes and governments for donations if Chicago style gangster ilk. If she is willing to do that for government access, what was to stop her from using our military as pay to play? Might it have already happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state-183315225--election.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/many-donors-clinton-foundation-met-her-state-183315225--election.html
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 18
Yes. But the issue isn't how I feel but how all of her supporters don't see it.
(6)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
100%. And the media has done all they can to shield her from it. Meanwhile, I see HRC after HRC add on TV, and nothing from Trump. All I can surmise is his campaign is waiting to do an all-out Blitz, or for one last bomb to drop. Of course, being honest, he was my last choice of Republican candidates. But given the choice now... all in.
(1)
(0)
Yes, she scares me to death including having slick Bill back in the White House. It's disgraceful how she has been given a pass when it comes to many subjects.
(5)
(0)
MSgt C Madd
SGT Christopher Clarke not unlike current POTUS, opposing any of his views or job performance you are deemed a racist, being critical of HRC you will be called a sexist. Tough to beat the Dem machine.
(2)
(0)
Here's what BOTHERS me... If ANYONE in this thread or on RallyPoint would have accepted 'donations' (I believe the DOD limit to service members of LESS than $20 or $50 in one year) in the amount that she accepted, we would have to either return it, or if we kept it, be prosecuted.
(2)
(0)
LTC (Join to see), everything the Clintons do concerns me, but apparently there are many that are not bothered in the least.
(2)
(0)
Absolutely, it shows a propensity by Clinton and/or those closest to her to accept money from those that may be diametrically opposed to the best interest of our nation in exchange for good "favor" on her behalf.
(2)
(0)
Anything concerning the Clintons getting back to the White House concerns me, they having been doing these type of things since he was governor.
(2)
(0)
Unless you've had your head in the sand for the last 100 or so years, this is how government works for both, or any of, the parties. There are so many government appointees out there that you couldn't begin to count them all. This is true at the Federal level of government, but probably even more rampant at the State and Local government levels. While there may be a bit of experience associated with who is chosen to fill them take a long hard look at how many appointees have been donors to the individual or party. It's how the system works!
(2)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
No this is how corrupt governments function. Whether it is Clinton or Nixon they all need to be removed from any elected or appointed office. I'm tired of this sad excuse that the American people should just accept corruption as if it is the status quo and there is no other option.
(3)
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
I agree, but not sure what anyone can do. When you at global politics Americans are a pretty benign lot. Bribery and corruption are pretty much a way of life in many countries; they often don't even try to hide it.
(0)
(0)
PO1 Richard Cormier
MAJ (Join to see) - Sir, you are correct. The other side of that coin is you forgot to say that the USA has a "Corrupt" form of government. We need to remove "professional Politicians" and get some common sense into politics. I do NOT expect to see it in my lifetime.
(1)
(0)
Sgt Mark Ramos
I don't like that argument. I think it's a rationalization to provide cover. I'm not saying that's how you meant it, Lt. Col., but that's the common usage. Of course there is always some degree of corruption in politics, it's human nature. But the Clintons have honed corruption to an art form. I'd challenge anyone who could name any US president from the last 100 years who has made over 200 million dollars by selling influence the way the Clintons have. Even adjusted for inflation, the Clintons have redefined public corruption.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next