Posted on Jul 27, 2015
Could this be what we face in the future - Iran urges India, China & Russia to counter NATO missile system?
4.57K
26
13
3
3
0
Could this be what we face in the future - Iran urges India, China & Russia to counter NATO missile system?
This article is dated, but with the recent events where the US is making a deal with Iran (lifting sanctions), thus allowing Iran to acquire new and updated military equipment, expand its capabilities; and Russia and the Chinese expanding their military capabilities; and the possibility of India joining them; is this what the new alliance of evil will look like for World War III?
http://www.rt.com/news/250209-iran-cooperation-amd-nato/
This article is dated, but with the recent events where the US is making a deal with Iran (lifting sanctions), thus allowing Iran to acquire new and updated military equipment, expand its capabilities; and Russia and the Chinese expanding their military capabilities; and the possibility of India joining them; is this what the new alliance of evil will look like for World War III?
http://www.rt.com/news/250209-iran-cooperation-amd-nato/
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
Any source other than Putin's mouthpiece? I would find an Indian alignment against NATO as decidedly odd. India's rapidly growing middle class hinges on Western economies and they share more in common with us than either Russia or China. The only shared concern they have there is geography.
That said, I think we have to remember that when it comes to Iran, we have a long and deservedly contentious relationship with the older generation. Any deals with Iran have to have the long game in mind as the younger crowd is less hardline, less angry and much more open to global integration. Some normalization while we wait for Khomeini to die is a good thing.
That said, I think we have to remember that when it comes to Iran, we have a long and deservedly contentious relationship with the older generation. Any deals with Iran have to have the long game in mind as the younger crowd is less hardline, less angry and much more open to global integration. Some normalization while we wait for Khomeini to die is a good thing.
(4)
(0)
What I've learned from past history lessons and the current state of the world is that we can't actually tell what the motives are of any country and we don't know which countries would truly aligned themselves with other countries opposing NATO and western coalition countries.
(4)
(0)
Here in lies a pitfall for the both the Russians and Chinese. With both countries having issues with their Muslim minorities, would this play well for these two nations. None of these countries are in the long haul for anything, Iran in the past referred to Soviets as the lesser devil. A PAX IIRC I don't really see. Even the Chinese eventually got tired of the Soviet/Stalin mindset. None of the countries want to be second string. Who leads it? Iran, no way in hell will Putin play second fiddle to some second world religious dictator. China's Le Kiquang is not going to rollover and play second tier to Putin or Iran, he is modernizing his forces so he can play a role in hegemony in his arenas of the world and force other countries to do China's bidding.
A weak alliance is better than no alliance, but are the tow main rulers willing to go to bat with some one who would risk war with the US/Israel? China would stand the most to lose economically. Russia gains little in this arrangement. Most certainly India would go Western, wanting to be in alliance with a main player. Pakistan, whom I have no doubt is helping Iran with their nuclear program, and has signed deal with china for ports in Pakistan.
My 2 cents.
A weak alliance is better than no alliance, but are the tow main rulers willing to go to bat with some one who would risk war with the US/Israel? China would stand the most to lose economically. Russia gains little in this arrangement. Most certainly India would go Western, wanting to be in alliance with a main player. Pakistan, whom I have no doubt is helping Iran with their nuclear program, and has signed deal with china for ports in Pakistan.
My 2 cents.
(4)
(0)
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
CW3 Kevin Storm I like your perspective on the issue, but remember Germany, Italy and Japan had major differences too during World War II. Something to keep in mind.
(2)
(0)
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
CW3 Kevin Storm Here is great articel on the US Response to Russia's military expansion:
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/05/a-us-response-to-russias-military-modernization
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/05/a-us-response-to-russias-military-modernization
A U.S. Response to Russia’s Military Modernization
The military modernization program conclusively demonstrates that in the next decades Russia will seek not only regional presence, influence, and dominance, but also a greater say in the global affairs.
(1)
(0)
CW3 Kevin Storm
The difference was in that conflict, Global Hegemony was the issue. With this we throw religion in this. Japan offered Germany nothing, and Italy sucked Germany into conflicts (Africa, and Greece) it really didn't want to get into. Technologically they didn't share a lot. Nor do I see the Russians sharing a lot with China or Iran. India is the worlds largest Democracy, I don't see them signing on to this ticket, but they have done weird things in the past, hence why they are full of Russian equipment.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next