Posted on Jan 19, 2014
MSG Master Leader Course Facilitator
10.7K
39
19
1
1
0
At the school house the APFT is being conducted and a student is improperly terminated during the sit up event by someone other than the Grader, Event Supervisor or OIC/NCOIC. The person was a MSG who was a course manager but not directly involved with the administration of the APFT. The Student while in the up rest position removed one hand from behind their head and adjusted their shorts which were riding up their leg, and then put the hand back. The repetition should not count but does not warrant to be terminated. The Grader confirms nothing was done to warrant termination but the MSG maintains that they thought they saw the Soldier pull themselves up using their hand. The NCOIC does nothing to maintain control over their APFT and the student fails the sit up event. A week later the student passes the retest with a score of 285, max the push ups and sit ups. The student also has excelled at all other requirements thus far but will be withheld from qualifying for honors. My question is giving the situation at hand does the schoolhouse give the student the benefit of the doubt due to mishandling the situation and not properly adminstering the APFT or does the student have to suck it up and drive on? My inclination is that the student should be given fair consideration of a benefit of the doubt especially when the incident was not handled properly. Looking for some advice and insight as I am trying my best to fight for this NCO as they are my student and all. We preach about doing what is right as NCO's and leaders..
Posted in these groups: Imgres Physical Training
Avatar feed
Responses: 6
1SG Steven Stankovich
10
10
0
SSG McGee, I would gather supporting documents, i.e. sworn statements, from all persons involved and take this up with your 1SG.  At a minimum the Commandant should be aware of the situation and should provide guidance, but not before you bring all the facts to your 1SG. 
(10)
Comment
(0)
MSG Master Leader Course Facilitator
MSG (Join to see)
11 y
Thank you MSG Stankovich. I will do that.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Assistant Intelligence Officer (S2)
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
I agree completely with MSG Stankovich.  Sworn statements from the grader, NCOIC, OIC, event supervisor, student, and the MSG that terminated the event.  The statements should include at a minimum what their role was in the event and what they personally observed.  If only the MSG observed or thought he/she observed the physical assistance on the student's part the grader at least would have observed the same thing.  Was anyone in the grader's line watching?  If so then you can get their sworn statement as well.  But these statements should definitely go to the 1SG and CO prior to going to the Commandant.
(3)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Multifunctional Logistician
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
It is all about having systems in place and not running directly to the highest levels prior to addressing the situation at the lowest levels.  NCOs are the experience and professionals that have the ability and courage to influence others without micromanagement.  At least the good ones!  Best of luck!
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Company First Sergeant
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
SPOT ON!! I would do precisely what the MSG said.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Michael Blount
5
4
1
Edited >1 y ago
The MSG was out of line for butting in where he didn't belong and the NCOIC needs to grow a spine.  The two of them should have taken the issue offline and discussed it out of earshot  of others.  The student has reason to appeal the original decision to the Commandant, via the 1SG, and some MSG has a lot of explaining to do.
(5)
Comment
(1)
MSG Master Leader Course Facilitator
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Thanks 1SG B.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
>1 y
SSG - just doing my job.  YOUR job is to now pay it foward.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG Master Leader Course Facilitator
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
That's something that I WILL do. 
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC William Swartz Jr
SFC William Swartz Jr
>1 y
Glad to see that you were able to get it rectified, I had a somewhat similar incident involving me in my BNCOC class back in '92. Another student was told that he had failed the run portion of the APFT and proceeded to cry to the Track chief that other NCOs had come in after him and passed, and he dropped names, yadda yadda. I was then informed, a week after the APFT by the 19K Track Chief(MSG) that I would have to take the APFT over as I was one of the individuals named and that I would not be able to compete for honors. I protested as we were informed that if we failed we would be counseled and I had not been counseled and to my knowledge had not failed, which I hadn't by the way. The MSG asked who my grader was, and I told him "You were MSG!", I then informed him that I wanted to protest this to the Commandant, but was told that that decision was final. So I had to wait and endure "remedial" pt for 4 weeks until the retest, which once again I passed, and instead of being the Distinguished Honor Grad, I had to watch as someone that has a GPA 3 full points lower than me was accorded that honor. Oh and the 19D that dropped names, I think his own track visited him one night to express their disapproval of his throwing fellow Soldiers under the bus, needless to say he was Persona non grata for the entire length of BNCOC.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Robert Blum
2
2
0
Love this.. NCOs taking care of business. Great work SSG McGee, far to many NCOs are afraid to speak up for others, and its for no reason at all. If you are right and tactful with your approach to the situation 99% of the time you will prevail.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close