Posted on Aug 13, 2015
SFC A.M. Drake
153K
628
303
51
49
2
Military Officers Don’t Need College Degrees

Military recruiters and top brass like to repeat the refrain that the average member of the armed forces is better educated than the average American. It’s true. According to the Defense Department, nearly 94% of enlisted personnel have a high-school diploma, while only 60% of Americans do. About 83% of officers have a bachelor’s degree, in comparison with 30% of the general population.

These statistics, though, involve a bit of self-selection: Most officers have a bachelor’s degree because becoming an officer generally requires one, though this prerequisite appears increasingly anachronistic.

For one thing, the requirement of a college degree is simply a box for officer candidates to check. It doesn’t matter to the armed forces where you went to school, what you studied, or how well you did—short of a minimal GPA level of about 2.5 out of 4.0.

Scholarships provided by the Reserve Officer Training Corps and military academies such as West Point and Annapolis may have more stringent criteria, but in general anyone with a four-year degree who can pass the basic background checks and physical requirements of the military may apply for Officer Candidate School.

Instead of mandating that officers have college degrees, the military should expand alternative avenues to officership. A few exceptions to the degree mandate already exist: Warrant officers or limited-duty officers—typically highly trained specialists in technical fields like avionics or equipment maintenance—have worked their way to officership. Their service is akin to apprenticeship, where useful knowledge is gained through practical experience, not textbook theory. Why not offer the same deal to other recruits?

Historically, a college degree signaled superior intelligence, critical reasoning and writing skills, and dedication. A degree holder could be expected to form logical, coherent arguments and effectively communicate ideas. But a college degree in 2015 no longer signals—let alone guarantees—much of anything.

According to a 2014 Lumina-Gallup poll, “just 11% of business leaders strongly agree that higher education institutions in this country are graduating students with the skills and competencies that their business needs, and 17% strongly disagree.” In a Chronicle for Higher Education survey published in March 2013, employers said that applicants with degrees lacked decision-making and problem-solving abilities, written and oral communication skills, adaptability, and even the capacity to manage multiple priorities.

Even more than in civilian environments, those are skills needed for war. If a college degree no longer confers them, then why should the armed forces require it at all? Beyond the usual arguments about the prohibitive cost for many high-school graduates unable to take on debt, a college degree isn’t needed to be successful. Peter Thiel, an accomplished tech businessman, offers a fellowship of $100,000 for aspiring entrepreneurs who want to skip college and build businesses instead. Companies started as a result now employ 200 people and have generated $200 million in economic activity, according to the fellowship.

Some may argue that obtaining a bachelor’s degree shows responsibility or maturity. Yet how much responsibility does a typical single, childless 22-year-old college senior have? Has he demonstrated greater responsibility than a 22-year-old corporal at the end of his first tour of duty? Has he even demonstrated greater responsibility than a 19-year-old private first class after six months of service?

The only mark of distinction that a college degree still indicates, perhaps, is dedication. It usually requires four or more years to achieve, and following through to the end suggests long-term commitment to a goal. Yet clearly, college and putting off the working world is not for everyone. In 2013, the six-year graduation rate in the U.S. was only 59%, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

Commitment is certainly important to success in the military, but the armed forces already have a way to measure and test it: a four-year enlistment. If aspiring officers must demonstrate commitment and responsibility, completing a four-year enlistment should suffice. If they must prove raw intellectual aptitude, high scores on the military’s own General Classification Test should be enough. If they must have general knowledge and the ability to think and write coherently, an exam akin to the State Department’s Foreign Service Officer Test would work.

A combination of these could easily form a new path to an officer’s commission—and providing an alternative to the bachelor’s degree would produce an even more qualified officer corps.

http://www.wsj.com/article_email/military-officers-dont-need-college-degrees [login to see] -lMyQjAxMTI1NzE3MzMxNTM3Wj
Avatar feed
Responses: 126
CPT Company Commander
50
50
0
I don't buy this at all. It is taking a stab a the officer corps. The school does matter. It has to be a federal accredited school. You just can't go to any school and become an officer. Even then you have to go to an OCS Board or be selected to contract while you are in ROTC. There are many out there that can't even get that far. We don't have an issue with officer strength. Why would we change it? The military can be picky when it comes to officers.

I think what it comes down to is that we serve the Nation. Everyone isn't entitled to become an officer. Any of us can work our way to become one. I was enlisted first and then commission but if one day I thought "Hey, I should get be handed a commission" then I would be more focused on myself than my nation.
(50)
Comment
(0)
LTC Stephen B.
LTC Stephen B.
>1 y
CPT (Join to see) - I see it more as a stab at contemporary "institutions of higher education". College degrees are not what they used to be. In an effort to make college a universal right/privilege, the requirements for both entry and graduation have been watered down over the years. Colleges, even "public" ones, are competing for the ever-present federal subsidies and no longer care much about who comes in. In fact, the more federal aid the applicant is expected to receive, the better the chance they'll get in.

Also, when everyone has a bachelor's degree, then it is no longer a discriminator.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Dave Johnston
SSG Dave Johnston
>1 y
PO1 (Verify To See) - PA School. for the Navy it's Independent Medical Corps men. than PA
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Greg Miech
SSG Greg Miech
6 y
One Commentator did an arbitrary for her father who retired from the FBI. They were told if they went for a Sociology degree he would stop the tuition and board, as he got a Sociology Degree for the agents had to get a degree to remain in the FBI at the time. Considered a waste of money. Would an officer with at least 36 hours of college in their assigned branches be of benefit? I tried talking to infantry officers about Sun Tzu, Clausewitz and battles to which they were not very familiar with. Guess they were waiting on the movie.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC(P) Timeo Williams
SPC(P) Timeo Williams
>1 y
SSG Warren Swan

There's a delineation of responsibility between both ranks.

I had the opportunity to speak to a retired SFC in the Army who was part of SFAB.

I asked him about the planning officers do and whether he's be interested in it. He probably said,"Hell no. I tried it once and it ain't for me. And that's true for most of the senior enlisted men in our unit. I'm glad to not take part in that."

The planning process, which is in itself an outcome of theoretical knowledge combined with logical thinking is an intellectually heavy process.

Much has been said about college degrees recently. We live in a very fast and adapting world. College is built to withstand that - with general education courses taught to allow the brain to frequent a wide variety of mental models and thought patterns - that is quite difficult to receive anywhere else.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Ricardo Marcial
37
37
0
Military personnel without degrees going in, well maybe. Military personnel leaving the military without a degree......BIG MISTAKE.
(37)
Comment
(0)
SGT Vehicle Operator/Dispatcher
SGT (Join to see)
9 y
Maj Walt Stachowicz - I mean no disrespect Maj. But, I am in the National Guard. I do my ATs etc. Deployed to Iraq and Katrina. I perform my job and give it 110% Now that said sir, I started school back in 08. I had an AT to go to 3 weeks after school started (my 1st semester). We convoyed to SC. Took us about 4 days. I requested my instructor send me my homework via email which he did. On my down time, I did my homework (there wasn't very much of that). For one evening, our CO decided to give us some free time and allow us some down time to go to the mall. At first he asked if I was going to go with them. I informed him that I will stay back and do my homework. Then, the only other qualified bus driver didn't want to go. So I stepped up and drove the bus and took them there (CO included). CO requested me to go with them and relax. I tactfully declined. I stayed with my bus and did my homework. All said and done, I was only getting about 3 hours of sleep per night. I walked out of AT and completed my semester with a 4.0. I didn't have late assignments etc. I now have a Bachelor's, am a Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH), and also have over 300 credit hours in Army Correspondence Courses. It can be done (Active or not), it just requires the will of said soldier to get it done.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Vehicle Operator/Dispatcher
SGT (Join to see)
9 y
Apparently it cut off my post - (Cont) per night. All said and done. I walked out of AT and finished my semester with a 4.0. No late assignments or anything. I now have my Bachelor's and am a Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH). I also have over 300 credit hours in Army Corespondence courses. So it can be done (Active or not). It just requires the will of said soldier to get it done.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Maj Walt Stachowicz
Maj Walt Stachowicz
9 y
Sorry if I offended anyone with my sarcasm. I did not have the opportunities that you young people do today. Please accept this from a grunt who joined 47 years ago, and no one joined the Marines in '68 for the educational benefits. We did not have shifts, and were often on call 24/7 even when Stateside. It's great that you can now spend some of your time improving yourselves rather than cleaning rifles, polishing brass and boots, etc. I'm an old curmudgeon, I guess, but my son had the same difficulties just working on his Professional Military Education between his 3 deployments to the sandbox, never mind working on an advanced civilian degree. They always have a reason for sending you TAD for more MOS training. So, SSgt Marcial, I did not make a big mistake, I just never had the opportunity that you were afforded. Times change.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Intelligence (S2)
SPC (Join to see)
6 y
Maj Walt Stachowicz - As an 11B in SOCOM in the 90s taking classes was only slightly less than impossible. I knew a lot of soft skill guys working 9-5s that were able to knock out degrees, but for us grunts not so much. :O(
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Jason Smallfield, PMP, CFM, CM
28
28
0
A few thoughts:
- Interesting that a former Marine LT would argue that a degree does not matter to be a military officer while he is pursuing an MBA and a master's in public policy. If he had the strength of his convictions that a degree does not matter then he would not pursue a higher degree.
- The statement that "It doesn’t matter to the armed forces that...what you studied, or how well you did" is an opinion, not a fact.
- The statement that "the military should expand alternative avenues to officership" merits consideration but the author provides no recommendations other than a four year enlistment.
- "a college degree in 2015 no longer signals—let alone guarantees—much of anything". This is more of a condemnation of the American higher education system (if accurate) than it is of military officer requirements.
- The author's arguments would carry more weight if he articulated and showed downstream effects of his arguments. He only argues at the entry and tactical levels and ignores the consequences at the operational/strategic levels of war and what happens 10/20/30 years from now if the military implements what he argues.
(28)
Comment
(0)
TSgt Joshua Copeland
TSgt Joshua Copeland
>1 y
COL Jason Smallfield, PMP, CFM, CM, I don't believe his point is that education doesn't matter. More so that a random degree in XYZ from State U given the current statistics presented does not in and of itself make a good yard stick for measuring aptitude for officership. That there might be other tools, methodologies and metrics that could be used that might be a more accurate predictor. Not that education is inherently bad. He does mention some of the DoD's existing standardized testing as well as the State Department's testing as possible methodologies as better measures of aptitude then the current degree/GPA yes or no block.

It would require a complete re-write of our entire Officer PME that is based on the assumption of a BA/BS degree and builds to the Masters Degree level and potentially the PhD level depending on schools selected to attend. This is even true for the enlisted side where AF Enlisted promotion to E8 requires an Associates Degree to even be eligible for promotion with a unofficial push of a BA/BA/Masters to be truly competitive.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Cgsc Student
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
Very well said Sir. I have seen the Army as a Soldier, NCO, Warrant Officer, Company Grade Officer and now as a field grade. As your span of influence increases as an Officer, it is imperative that you acquire and maintain polished communication skills. These skills can only be gained through practice and the pursuit of higher education.

Air Cav!
(5)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
>1 y
Well written Sir! I have to wonder if it is just not a project he needs for his graduate education and not something he feels passionate about. Many of us have been required to write such papers and I hope I have done better than you clearly ripped this piece of work.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Maj Developmental Engineer
Maj (Join to see)
>1 y
I think this is especially true for technical career fields. If I had not studied engineering, I would have been lost when some of my 100-lb brain folks were trying to explain to me what we were developing/building within acquisitions. And even worse, I wouldn't have been able to contribute anything technical back to them or make an informed decision on which direction to take the platform. Without the background, yes, I could have simply managed them and trusted that they knew what they were doing even if they were speaking a different language to me But is that leadership? Is that being an officer?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close