Posted on Jun 16, 2015
Should the EIB/EFMB be changed to become a true qualification?
97.7K
508
195
10
10
0
This came up in another thread about the Unit Commander making everyone remove all badges for training.
Should the EIB/EFMB which is currently a one time event to permanent award of the badge be changed to be more inline with the marksmanship badges where you must re-qualify every X period to maintain the badge and title of "expert"
Being a AF Guy, I have no skin in the game, it came up so I thought I would as RP!
Should the EIB/EFMB which is currently a one time event to permanent award of the badge be changed to be more inline with the marksmanship badges where you must re-qualify every X period to maintain the badge and title of "expert"
Being a AF Guy, I have no skin in the game, it came up so I thought I would as RP!
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 65
If we are talking about this, then you might as well make Ranger school a re-qual. EIB/EFMB are not as grueling, but to me, it would be the same concept. That's a huge NO. This idea shouldn't even be entertained. Just my opinion.
(35)
(0)
TSgt Joshua Copeland
SFC Kevin Cornett, nope not either, I was as medic prior to the service though so I have a basic understanding. Both my parents are Marines so I grew knowing the Marine Riflemen mentality. Again, it was brought up in another thread, and there have been some folks that that ARE Army, that DO have EFMB/EIBs that say the idea has merit. I just brought it forward for discussion. As for AF AFSC (MOS) Badges, they are actual directly tied to skill level. The basic badge is awarded upon completion of "3" level apprentice training. the senior badge (star) is awarded upon completion of "7" level craftsman training and the master(star and wreath) badge upon promotion to E7 as long as you have at least 5 years from the time of the award of your "7" level". There are some exceptions, but that is the baseline.
(2)
(0)
SFC Kevin Cornett
If you (and any individual that is confused as to what the EIB/EFMB actually is) want to know what the requirements are, and the idea behind these awards, I would suggest you review AR 600-8-22, and DA Pam 40-20 (EFMB). Again, these badges are awarded after completion of criteria, just like Air Assault, Just like Airborne, Just like the Ranger Tab (I am not comparing the difficulty level, just the completion of a set criteria/school = earned right to wear badge/tab).
As far as being proficient in skills/tasks; Medics are required to complete the 68W training every 2 years to maintain the MOS. That has to happen whether or not they have a CMB/EFMB.
To be perfectly honest, there seems to be some badge/award envy or maybe if they are holders of the badge, some unnecessary protectionism of them.
You meet the requirements, you attend the course, you complete all tasks, you get awarded the badge. That is it. Any Medic or Infantryman may attempt to earn their respective badges at any time; Many try, and most fail. Why are you interested in taking these badges away from those that didn't fail?
As far as being proficient in skills/tasks; Medics are required to complete the 68W training every 2 years to maintain the MOS. That has to happen whether or not they have a CMB/EFMB.
To be perfectly honest, there seems to be some badge/award envy or maybe if they are holders of the badge, some unnecessary protectionism of them.
You meet the requirements, you attend the course, you complete all tasks, you get awarded the badge. That is it. Any Medic or Infantryman may attempt to earn their respective badges at any time; Many try, and most fail. Why are you interested in taking these badges away from those that didn't fail?
(7)
(0)
COL Michael Birchfield
I have both, EIB (AUG 1976, B co 1/75th) and CIB (NOV 2005, Bastogne! Hawija, Iraq. The EIB, EFMB should be a one time event, just like Ranger School, SFQC, Jump school etc; you pass the requirements....you earn the badge / tab.
(11)
(0)
SSG Paul Newman
EIB & EFMB are week long demonstrations of mastery of your field. They are a mark of excellence requiring critical thinking, stamina and expertise. You don't measure it like how many rounds hit the target. It's measured by who would be your first choice if you need someone to have your back or save your ass!
(2)
(0)
No, the badge is a symbol of accomplishment, not a qualification. Once you meet the standard, you've met it. if we change the standard for the EIB and EFMB, the we should re qualify all badges and tabs.
The time , effort and funding for these requalifications wouldn't justify the need. We expect the troops to remain qualified in their MOS and leaders to ensure that it happens.
The time , effort and funding for these requalifications wouldn't justify the need. We expect the troops to remain qualified in their MOS and leaders to ensure that it happens.
(32)
(0)
WO1 Matthew Scraper
I would agree, and would add that there is a morale issue here as well. Earning an EIB/EFMB could likely matter little to soldiers if regular recertification is required. I would also be curious as to who would run the training/testing. When I earned my EIB, the testing stations were run by Infantryman who had already earned an EIB.
(7)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
WO1 Matthew Scraper it wouldn't be all that much more difficult than Bradley or Abram's platform table 6 qualifications. There is still a standard and instead of having already certified badge holders, you have master Gunners to do it. They certify crews on a qualification. You could have a "master infantry" school and trained and certified "master infantrymen" in every unit who could oversee, run, and certify the training...
(0)
(0)
I think I may be a little emotional today for some reason...
I have been awarded both the Combat Medical Badge and the Expert Field Medical Badge. My class started with 432 and 9 graduated with the badge. I worked my @ss off to get that thing and wonder why an IT guy in the AF is questioning an Army award. I guess since I haven't jumped out of a plane in a decade or so, I should lose that one too. I'm not really trying to be disrespectful, but I would never question an AF award.
I have been awarded both the Combat Medical Badge and the Expert Field Medical Badge. My class started with 432 and 9 graduated with the badge. I worked my @ss off to get that thing and wonder why an IT guy in the AF is questioning an Army award. I guess since I haven't jumped out of a plane in a decade or so, I should lose that one too. I'm not really trying to be disrespectful, but I would never question an AF award.
(25)
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
SPC (Join to see) - The EFMB does not test to medical skills of what an 68W should know and is little higher than the first aid you learn in basic training.
(1)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
If you would say the same thing about 68W AIT, then that is your opinion. What I meant is that it tests the baseline skills expected of every green 68W, plus soldiering skills acquired in basic (mostly), and trained at their unit.
MAJ Byron Oyler You may be a higher medical authority, but I think you're wrong here. Increasingly so, since the number of techniques taught to CLS was reduced since I left basic.
MAJ Byron Oyler You may be a higher medical authority, but I think you're wrong here. Increasingly so, since the number of techniques taught to CLS was reduced since I left basic.
(1)
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
SPC (Join to see) - I was a 91B when NREMT was not required, know the first aid taught in basic training, and the medical side required to pass EFMB. EFMB tells me you are a determined physically fit solder that can pass a set of tasks that you have ample training to learn. It is extremely tough to achieve and tells to the character of the soldier but nothing to abilities when the causalities start flowing. Tasks in combat lifesaver were changed because so many focused on the IV portion and not what was killing soldiers, bleeding out.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next