Should peer and/or subordinate comments have a role in NCOERs/E4 Evals?

It's being tested on the officer side now...Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback (MSAF) 360

http://msaf.army.mil/LeadOn.aspx

Peer Evals, aka "Spear Evals." Peer evals, in my estimation, are a good tool for training environments. They can demonstrate writing and communication skills --and offer a perspective that may be overlooked by evaluators. However, in operational commands, I don't see value in peer, or even subordinate, evaluations. Subordinates should be focused on their own proverbial trees. Seniors should be looking to the health of the forest.

I think peer reviews could be good, but there might be issues having subordinates comment