3
3
0
Healthcare
Supreme Court
Responses: 7
6
6
0
The willingness of the Court to keep hearing these cases leads me to believe they are just waiting for the correct argument to overturn it.
As written, it is poor law.
I understand that it's Intent is good, admirable even, and there is an overwhelming urge to do something when you know a system is broken, however doing the wrong thing can make things worse, not better.
The ACA will allow us to learn from our failures, at least.
As written, it is poor law.
I understand that it's Intent is good, admirable even, and there is an overwhelming urge to do something when you know a system is broken, however doing the wrong thing can make things worse, not better.
The ACA will allow us to learn from our failures, at least.
(6)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
SGT Jim Z. my biggest problems with the law are its infringements on Liberty, and on its actual implementation.
Freedom of Choice includes the Freedom to make bad decisions. Americans should be allowed to not buy insurance, for whatever reason. Everyone's situation is different, but insurance is about risk assessment, and if you believe your risk is low enough, you should be able to opt out. Personally, I don't take that risk. I think it's a bad choice, but just because I don't agree with something, doesn't give me the right to take it away from someone else.
Second is the implementation. In an attempt to make sweeping changes, they went too far. They could have done little changes, and gotten away with it. Things like allowing children to stay on parents policies, increasing protections for pre-existing conditions & not dropping customers. But they tried to do too much too fast. Most people are reasonable, as long as you give them a choice. When you mandate something, we become pig-headed just for spite, even if it is a good idea, or there's good intentions.
Freedom of Choice includes the Freedom to make bad decisions. Americans should be allowed to not buy insurance, for whatever reason. Everyone's situation is different, but insurance is about risk assessment, and if you believe your risk is low enough, you should be able to opt out. Personally, I don't take that risk. I think it's a bad choice, but just because I don't agree with something, doesn't give me the right to take it away from someone else.
Second is the implementation. In an attempt to make sweeping changes, they went too far. They could have done little changes, and gotten away with it. Things like allowing children to stay on parents policies, increasing protections for pre-existing conditions & not dropping customers. But they tried to do too much too fast. Most people are reasonable, as long as you give them a choice. When you mandate something, we become pig-headed just for spite, even if it is a good idea, or there's good intentions.
(3)
(0)
SGT Jim Z.
I fully agree with your problems with the law Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS. I was making the crack that politicians usually do not learn from their mistakes because they go along with the money source i.e. the special interest groups.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad, I worked for group health insurance companies for over 23 years. Everyone in that business, even neophytes, knew that the ACA would run counter to virtually every commonly accepted principle of group insurance, and that the results would be catastrophic.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
One can only hope Gunny. There were a number of ways we could have worked on covering people that needed it without this monstrosity of a law that no one understands and the president keeps changing (even though he is not allowed to change legistlation).
Sometimes the simplest solution is the best. Perhaps for those that needed coverage we could have provided lower cost coverage with a sliding scale of what they would pay in premiums based upon household income. We could have pointed them to "approved" companies to provided the coverage, collect the premiums etc.
We could have then worked on the cost side of healthcare, something we still are not doing. We have to make it cost less. Lot's has been said on the topic, healthcare is important to people and we turned it into a political issue with the law and the way it was passed (and not read).
Sometimes the simplest solution is the best. Perhaps for those that needed coverage we could have provided lower cost coverage with a sliding scale of what they would pay in premiums based upon household income. We could have pointed them to "approved" companies to provided the coverage, collect the premiums etc.
We could have then worked on the cost side of healthcare, something we still are not doing. We have to make it cost less. Lot's has been said on the topic, healthcare is important to people and we turned it into a political issue with the law and the way it was passed (and not read).
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google