4
4
0
I was wondering if this gun control stuff comes down to it, could soldiers disobey an order to take someone’s weapons on the grounds that it violates the constitution?
Gun Control
Constitution
Orders
JAG
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 11
5
5
0
This is a fools errand of a question. AR600-20 is the source of an officer's ability to issue orders and an NCOs ability to supervise. The MCM is the source on UCMJ particularly Article 92. Most of what you are looking for is not regulation but federal law. Much of it covered in the DSCA I and II joint course.
Posse Commitatus prevents Title 10 Active Duty military or state forces under federal control from enforcing the law unless the Insurrection act is in effect. There is an extremely narrow range of circumstances where Title 10 forces can enforce laws, which weapon confiscation would fall under. It requires a request from the state and a presidential order. It happened during the LA Riots, and they "read the riot act" and the crowd did not disperse. Federal troops restored order in conjunction with beleaguered law enforcement.
State forces under control of the governor may enforce the law in accordance with state law. Each state varies a little. The key term is State Active Duty (SAD). Title 32 authority is a gray area.
Just because it happened before does not mean it was legal or a lawful order. The Obama administration distributing fuel in NYC during Sandy was illegal...and an election year. Katrina was a whole series of made up stuff.
Coast guard can enforce law by Title 14 Authority
Posse Commitatus prevents Title 10 Active Duty military or state forces under federal control from enforcing the law unless the Insurrection act is in effect. There is an extremely narrow range of circumstances where Title 10 forces can enforce laws, which weapon confiscation would fall under. It requires a request from the state and a presidential order. It happened during the LA Riots, and they "read the riot act" and the crowd did not disperse. Federal troops restored order in conjunction with beleaguered law enforcement.
State forces under control of the governor may enforce the law in accordance with state law. Each state varies a little. The key term is State Active Duty (SAD). Title 32 authority is a gray area.
Just because it happened before does not mean it was legal or a lawful order. The Obama administration distributing fuel in NYC during Sandy was illegal...and an election year. Katrina was a whole series of made up stuff.
Coast guard can enforce law by Title 14 Authority
(5)
(0)
4
4
0
In my opinion, it would be an unlawful order. We took an oath to "Support and Defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies....". The Constitution is the law of the land and any order given that violates the law is unlawful.
(4)
(0)
CPL Earl Kochis
Msgt Thomas you are correct our oath comes in several parts the first part overrules the rest! If our leaders orders violate the Constitution they are unlawful that includes all the way to the President! You are to follow lawful orders only also those orders must be Morally sound! The question on morally sound is by whose morals?? This is where the dilemma falls! But the answer to that one is simple if the order defies military values of that branch it is immoral!! So memorizing your branches values is important!
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
Oh, great question. It has happened. The National Guard confiscated weapons in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. No receipts handed out making it impossible to return them (especially onerous for those with collections of antique and specialty guns). And it's a tough question. There's a difference between unlawful and unconstitutional. Orders may be consistent with the law until the law is adjudicated to be unconstitutional. Until then, we have to follow them. I suspect that if you are penalized (fined/imprisoned/busted/discharged) for failure to follow an order that is lawful, but the law is latter judged to be unconstitutional, you won't get relief. The order was lawful at the time it was issued. However, that's just an opinion and I suspect there are others who will differ. (...and you know what we say about opinions)
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google