Posted on Oct 9, 2014
1SG Chris Brown
2.12K
19
15
0
0
0
So apparently DoD has decided to be so generous by providing our troops with a whopping $400 extra per month for deploying to Africa to fight the spread of Ebola. Wow, really? A Soldier who goes to Korea, or any other unaccompanied tour, also gets the $250 in Family Separation Allowance. And many places, such as Korea, can qualify for up to $150 in Hardship Duty Pay. But there is no Imminent Danger Pay in Africa? Half the continent is at war and our troops are going in to combat (and potentially contract) and extremely deadly disease. Also, forget any kind of tax incentives, since they are not in a combat zone. A Soldier can go TDY to school and make more than these folks will make in such a dangerous place.

So, how much should they get? I would sure think more than a measly $400 extra would be in order. Anyone else think the same? Or should they just suck it up, follow orders, and be happy with the $400?


http://www.armytimes.com/article/20141009/BENEFITS02/310090049/Troops-fighting-Ebola-will-earn-up-400-extra-per-month
Avatar feed
Responses: 7
SGM Senior Adviser, National Communications
4
4
0
Tough to put a price on life. Or death.
(4)
Comment
(0)
LTC Dr Richard Wasserman, LTC (R)
LTC Dr Richard Wasserman, LTC (R)
10 y
They should not be ordered to go--but can volunteer if they so choose.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Rocky Kleeger
1
1
0
$400 isn't enough
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Deputy Director, Combat Casualty Care Research Program
1
1
0
I've heard the soldiers from RIID heading out there are being put on TDY, vs being deployed. That means no weapons/no gear, and no combat or hazard duty pay.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Instructor Navigator
Lt Col (Join to see)
10 y
That will work out well when the local militia takes a run at them.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close