Posted on Jun 26, 2014
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
4.2K
62
56
1
1
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 15
LTC Paul Labrador
5
5
0
I don't necessarily think money used to train foreign militaries as a waste. I see it as a long term investment, where the reward you reap is that you won't need to send our boys over there which WILL entail a higher cost in dollars and American blood in the long term.

The issue I see here is the POTUS's timing. This should have been done TWO YEARS ago. At this point, it's too little too late. Using the investment analogy again, it's all about timing. Had we given money to the rebels back when it was purely a secular fight between them and the government, we may have been able to shape and inflluence the outcome to our benefit. We refused to do that, so someone else stepped in (ISIS) and shaped and influenced the fight to THEIR benefit.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Brett Wagner
Cpl Brett Wagner
10 y
MSgt Curtis Borders - NO SIR you are not crazy, well I can't really tell from this post but my guess is no. You are spot on brother.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
Capt Jeff S.
10 y
Training and equipping our enemies... An exercise in futility.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Electrical Power Production
MSgt (Join to see)
10 y
Capt Jeff S. Guess we can't argue we have a bad track record.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Steve Oakes
SGT Steve Oakes
10 y
If we train and equip them. We will just be making yet another group that we will end up fighting at some point in the future.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
3
3
0
Bob P. seeks $500M to live vicariously in the lap of luxury for the rest of his life. Yeah that'll happen!
(3)
Comment
(0)
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
>1 y
Split it three way then !!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
MAJ Robert (Bob) Petrarca
>1 y
Not a prob. there's enough zero for everybody! :-)
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
>1 y
I will split it with you sir !
(0)
Reply
(0)
1LT Nick Kidwell
1LT Nick Kidwell
10 y
and zero divided by the entire population of Rally Point is...let's see...carry the 1...mumblemumblemumble...yep. Still zero.

Math still works. ;)
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCpl Steve Wininger
3
3
0
Abso-freaking-lutely not. One, it is a slap to every vet and active duty service member because the government claims they can't take care of us well enough...500 million could help the military and vets out quite a bit. two, every time we help someone in the Middle East it comes back to haunt us, examples, Saddam, and Bin Laden. Three, who is vetting these rebels, I do not see anyone in Washington qualified. They cannot even vet their appointees let alone a terrorist rebel.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
MSG(P) Michael Warrick
>1 y
Absolutely it is a slap in the face as you have stated. Great points and thanks for sharing!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close