Posted on Jun 15, 2016
Will a field grade Article 15 and demotion (no GOMAR) doom an NCO for upcoming QMP or promotion boards?
41.5K
62
85
5
5
0
Responses: 44
SSG (Join to see) From my experience (which I admit is dated), I think the chances are very likely (above 95%) that a person will not survive a Field Grade Art 15 (or even a Company Grade Art 15) in his/her file during a QMP Board review. I could provide you with several examples I have personally witnessed and, in several, tried my best to get turned-around, but that would serve no real purpose. My recommendation is to plan for the worst and hope for the best, but I think it is highly unlikely a person would survive a QMP with bad paper in his/her file, when they are being compared to thousands with no bad paper and they have to identify discriminators for choosing those who will be identified for discharge.
(7)
(0)
1LT William Clardy
COL Jean (John) F. B., my squadron commander reduced me from sergeant to specialist 4th class when he gave me a field-grade Article 15, but I still got recommended for promotion to staff sergeant a couple of years later. It probably helped that the squadron legal NCO was a friend who sat on my appeal until my temper had cooled down, and that the same squadron commander who took my rank apparently suggested to the appellate authority that my Article 15 be overturned.
But, as you said, my experience is dated (by almost a quarter of a century), and today's Army (heck, the Army of just a few years after my rank-bouncing) is much less forgiving of any mistakes.
But, as you said, my experience is dated (by almost a quarter of a century), and today's Army (heck, the Army of just a few years after my rank-bouncing) is much less forgiving of any mistakes.
(0)
(0)
COL Jean (John) F. B.
1LT William Clardy - I understand what you are saying, but you did not face a QMP Board as an NCO. I predict that, if you had, you would have been selected for discharge.
I had several NCOs in my commands discharged under QMP... most with only an Article 15 from several years in their past (and several promotions ago). I was only able to save one from that fate and, the only way I was able to do that was to delay giving him the notice until he had reached his retirement lock-in date (only a few days after my receiving instructions to notify him). He went on a no-notice leave and I was unable to contact him before his lock-in date ... :-) :-)
Most NCO's being QMP probably fit the description above ... a single Art 15 from years back. The problem is that the Army has to identify a certain number for elimination to meet mandated force reductions/limits and those with only one instance of "bad paper" are being compared with the vast majority who have no bad paper in their files. As such, it is used as a discriminator and, more often than not, is the kiss of death.
I know or have known several super NCOs with bad paper and would choose them over other squeaky-clean folks in a moment; unfortunately, the system is geared to look at records, not people.
I had several NCOs in my commands discharged under QMP... most with only an Article 15 from several years in their past (and several promotions ago). I was only able to save one from that fate and, the only way I was able to do that was to delay giving him the notice until he had reached his retirement lock-in date (only a few days after my receiving instructions to notify him). He went on a no-notice leave and I was unable to contact him before his lock-in date ... :-) :-)
Most NCO's being QMP probably fit the description above ... a single Art 15 from years back. The problem is that the Army has to identify a certain number for elimination to meet mandated force reductions/limits and those with only one instance of "bad paper" are being compared with the vast majority who have no bad paper in their files. As such, it is used as a discriminator and, more often than not, is the kiss of death.
I know or have known several super NCOs with bad paper and would choose them over other squeaky-clean folks in a moment; unfortunately, the system is geared to look at records, not people.
(1)
(0)
CSM Michael Salfai
You may survive a QMP Board but to do so you had better be head and shoulders above your peers in other respects.
(1)
(0)
MSG Mitch Dumont
It is doubtful that you will meet the QMP. I didn't read how many years you had in service. That is also a factor. If you are not approved for retention, might I suggest the National Guards or the Reserves as an option to continue your military service.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next