Posted on Dec 3, 2013
SFC Assistant Center Leader/Physician Recruiter
6.96K
75
44
7
7
0
Wouldn't this help the Command as a whole. Instead of trying to find a way to change why not stick with what works. I'm sure if you presented them with a way out they would leave. Why not get rid of the ones who want to leave, and concentrate our future on the ones who want to stay?
Avatar feed
Responses: 24
CMC Robert Young
9
9
0
Following the first Gulf War, the Coast Guard did exactly that. People who wanted out were offered the opportunity simply leave. I have a friend who did it several months before his ETS date with very little paperwork or hassle.
(9)
Comment
(0)
SGM Matthew Quick
SGM Matthew Quick
11 y
You're reading my mind, Chief!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Matthew Quick
9
9
0
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

The military tried this approach post-Gulf War...turned out they met their new end strengths quickly, but ultimately depleted both the NCO and officer corps for years.
(9)
Comment
(0)
SGM Matthew Quick
SGM Matthew Quick
11 y
It's own jobs as leaders to provide the purpose, direction and MOTIVATION to our Soldiers.

We cannot always pick and choose who we want to lead...it's not a perfect world.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGM Matthew Quick
SGM Matthew Quick
11 y
*It's OUR (not own)
(0)
Reply
(0)
CMC Robert Young
CMC Robert Young
11 y
Too true. We seem to re-invent the wheel every couple of years due to our own lack of corporate memory.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Public Affairs Officer
CPT (Join to see)
11 y

To piggy back off of your comment, MSG Quick:

 

We all know a few less than stellar Soldiers at all levels who would wish to remain in the military. If there was a vaccuum of Soldier leadership due to a mass exodus of some of the more talented Soldiers, these Soldiers could end up being the ones picking up the slack by taking on leadership roles they are not ready for or do not have the talent for.

 

I understand the initial "wow" factor of the simplicity of the idea of permitting voluntary resignation and discharge, especially with the news of the past couple of days regarding the downsizing. However, I think we could find ourselves in a manning nightmare just due to the uneven nature we would lose people. Some ranks and/or MOSs could become overly depleted, while others could still have an excess. It definitely would not permit for a controlled force shaping effort which will be key in the downsizing.

(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG C Ied & Irw Instructor
7
7
0

It's a double edged sword, on one hand we want only the motivated to stay and pursue a professional career and on the other hand we don't want to lose massive amounts of experience.

 

I think there should be a program to offer "early out", where a soldier is obviously not a good fit for the military lifestyle but hasn't committed any offenses to warrant ucmj and chapter.  They're not bad people, they just weren't meant to pursue this lifestyle and career.

(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close