Posted on Apr 11, 2016
CH (MAJ) William Beaver
15.5K
166
55
19
19
0
7387c9a
D35eb86
7961059
0a484ff
In your opinion, what was the toughest military battle ever fought by United States forces? Why? What was it's significance? What was the toughest era to be a combat Soldier in, according to your opinion?
Avatar feed
Responses: 34
Cpl Jon Westbrook
20
20
0
I have to go with WWI here. People have never felt panic until they start getting shelled and gassed in a confined area and aren't able to flee. If you go over the top you get killed by the enemy, if you run you get killed by your own officers. They didn't have proper gas masks so their lungs were fried and they slowly drowned in their own blood.

The dead piled up a few yards from the trench, and swelled and burst in the sun because they couldn't get to them safely. thousands of dead rotting horses and cattle lay everywhere, and the soldiers were forced to stand in their own feces. Not to mention the rain and the cold. And if you did manage to go over the top you were most likely killed by mines, artillery, or cut down by machine guns while you were tangled up in concertina wire. And the worst part was the mental portion. There was absolutely no hope. There weren't towns being captured all of the time, you'd drive them back a few hundred yards, only to be chased back a week later into the same hole you had just left.

It was a grey, desolate wasteland of absolute hell. Id take any other war before I went through that.
(20)
Comment
(0)
SFC Combat Engineer
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Yeah WW1 was absolutely stupid. No hope.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM William Payne
13
13
0
Antietam / Sharpsburg September 17, 1862. 130,000 soldiers counting both sides, 22,000+ casualties, 3,600+ dead in basically one day.
(13)
Comment
(0)
1stSgt Sergeant Major/First Sergeant
1stSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
Landscape Turned Red is a good read on the battle. Tells the story quite well.
http://www.amazon.com/Landscape-Turned-Red-Battle-Antietam/dp/ [login to see]
(2)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Sergeant Major/First Sergeant
1stSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
CSM William Payne - The real killer was that the tactics did not change as the weapons grew more deadly. Weapons that are effective at 800 yards are devastating at 50.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CSM William Payne
CSM William Payne
>1 y
Your exactly right. I was going to add that little fact but forgot. The last war faught using Napoleon tactics but with modern technology.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ L. Nicholas Smith
MAJ L. Nicholas Smith
>1 y
CSM William Payne - While you are correct that many medical techniques and technology were similar to those used during the Revolutionary War, the system did undergo some real progress during the war. Of note, the use of medical evacuation to move a casualty from the battle to the hospital was a new innovation and saved untold numbers. At Antietam, the Union used more than 50 ambulances where the wounded ran around 10,000. In addition, doctors led their own innovative methods such as Benjamin Howard who developed a new means of treating sucking chest wounds and quadrupled the survival rate. In other wars, survival rates for the same wound had been as low as 5%.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT John " Mac " McConnell
12
12
0
This is A very tough question in itself... Toughest is a generalized term. Everybody has their own idea when it comes to what it means. So only one battle comes to mind for me. The Battle for Iwo Jima..https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Medal_of_Honor_recipients_for_the_Battle_of_Iwo_Jima
(12)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close