2
2
0
Here's a question for all you JAG types out there. This Soldier has filed a lawsuit over the new 670-1 tattoo reg. We all know judicial review can abolish or strike down portions of civilian legislation, but could a lawsuit like the one this Soldier filed result in a legally mandated change to a military regulation? Is there a precedent?
http://www.businessinsider.com/soldier-tattoo-lawsuit-2014-5
http://www.businessinsider.com/soldier-tattoo-lawsuit-2014-5
JAG
DA Pam 670-1
Tattoos
Regulation
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
1
1
0
I think if you can argue for a change of the hair style regulation you should be able to argue for a change in the tattoo regulation. If you don't like the regulation you can always exercise you rights to petition the powers that be for a change.
Just kidding. I think both of these issues are ridiculous. Grow up and deal with it.
Just kidding. I think both of these issues are ridiculous. Grow up and deal with it.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Wow - people will sue for anything. I don't know about the "unconstitutional" part. We give up a lot of rights when we join the Military.
Should be interesting to follow though.
Should be interesting to follow though.
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
I never saw the dog deal with tattoos. As long as they are not offensive and not on your face and hands I don't see a problem
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google