Posted on Apr 17, 2021
US police and public officials donated to Kyle Rittenhouse, data breach reveals
284
5
3
2
2
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
....And?
Aside from a vicious move to dox folks, what is the purpose of this article? The article is written to make it sound like these people are doing something illegal. Which they are not. Or that there is some mass conspiracy to... I don't know... protect Rittenhouse from an overzealous DA?
$100 donations? 10$ donations?
These are normal, honest folks chipping in spare change for a legal defense which will prove to be very expensive. Even if Rittenhouse is found guilty, that STILL doesn't make these folks evil, or mean what they did was in ANY WAY wrong.
John Adams - one of our most respected leaders, founding father, and President - defended the British Soldiers in the Boston Massacre trial, because everyone is entitled to a good and proper defense. Even the guilty. Even the reviled.
Even if you hate Rittenhouse and think he is the scum of the earth who gets off on murdering babies, it is STILL not wrong to support his right to a proper defense. Which in *this* particular case, with an overzealous DA who has NO restrictions on cost (hey, it's just tax money, we can always get more), means he needs MONEY for a good lawyer - and for all of the work that good lawyer is going to have to do.
Aside from a vicious move to dox folks, what is the purpose of this article? The article is written to make it sound like these people are doing something illegal. Which they are not. Or that there is some mass conspiracy to... I don't know... protect Rittenhouse from an overzealous DA?
$100 donations? 10$ donations?
These are normal, honest folks chipping in spare change for a legal defense which will prove to be very expensive. Even if Rittenhouse is found guilty, that STILL doesn't make these folks evil, or mean what they did was in ANY WAY wrong.
John Adams - one of our most respected leaders, founding father, and President - defended the British Soldiers in the Boston Massacre trial, because everyone is entitled to a good and proper defense. Even the guilty. Even the reviled.
Even if you hate Rittenhouse and think he is the scum of the earth who gets off on murdering babies, it is STILL not wrong to support his right to a proper defense. Which in *this* particular case, with an overzealous DA who has NO restrictions on cost (hey, it's just tax money, we can always get more), means he needs MONEY for a good lawyer - and for all of the work that good lawyer is going to have to do.
(1)
(0)
Guardian doxxing donors now? Would we hold the journalists liable for murder if the t hose people get lynched?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next