Posted on Oct 30, 2023
The Left wants to get rid of the Electoral College. We must preserve it. | PragerU
1.31K
1
4
0
0
0
Posted 1 y ago
Responses: 1
There are valid arguments for and against the electoral college and anything coming from PragerU is not worth of consideration from the start.
(1)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
There is only one valid argument for or against the electoral college. The Constitution.
All other arguments or moot.
All other arguments or moot.
(0)
(0)
SPC Jeff Daley, PhD
SGT (Join to see) If you watched the video you can see that the presentation was constitutionally based with appropriate references to those points in the constitution. Or does your consternation come from invited speakers that include prominent conservatives such as Ben Shapiro, and Candace Owens? Granted, PragerU is a conservative think tank - Is that why you invalidate the institution?
I believe I have a fractured understanding of your "opinion" but without valid data that is the nucleus of an opinion and I find the statement is not understandable. Can you clarify your opinion with backup data or just prefer to extoll your opinions? Either is acceptable but for myself, I would like to understand the embryotic source for the statement. Thanks, and make it a great day!
SFC Casey O'Mally SFC John Davis SGT Tresa Silva-Rooks SFC (Join to see) CW3 John Wescott
I believe I have a fractured understanding of your "opinion" but without valid data that is the nucleus of an opinion and I find the statement is not understandable. Can you clarify your opinion with backup data or just prefer to extoll your opinions? Either is acceptable but for myself, I would like to understand the embryotic source for the statement. Thanks, and make it a great day!
SFC Casey O'Mally SFC John Davis SGT Tresa Silva-Rooks SFC (Join to see) CW3 John Wescott
(0)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PragerU - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibitsone or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
(0)
(0)
Read This Next