Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
4
4
0
I hope that one can be developed, the cost of it will probably be astronomical, but it may save a lot of our guys in the long run shipmate PO2 (Join to see)
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Jeff S.
2
2
0
You don’t get something for nothing. It will be much heavier. Also, the further away you shoot the more time the tank crew has to react — assuming they see the smoke from the launch. There are pros and cons and for a vehicle mounted system the additional weight may be acceptable but for a shoulder fired system that has to be lugged by troops, the additional weight of propellant will make it unacceptable.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO3 John Jeter
PO3 John Jeter
>1 y
Unless we can develop a better propellant or a different attack technique. I’ve always wondered about a smaller charge that took a pop up flight profile, gaining altitude and coming down on the target instead of a head on shot. Then again, I’m just an old fart cannon cocker off the water. *grin*.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
2
2
0
PO2 (Join to see) Always Better to "Reach Out and Touch Someone" at a Greater Range.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close