3
3
0
Gun Control
2nd Amendment
Concealed Carry
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 4
2
2
0
I didn't care to keep reading when I started. Now, we are campaiging to bring in the wild west mentality. Teachers armed with guns signifies something very dark down the road. I get it; the world is running out of options. Put GOD back in the schools, the courthouses, the communities, in the military, in the church buildings, raising our families, marriages - just put God back in the earth. Enter anti-God legislation Exit totally worldwide destruction. Sgt Wayne Wood this is a thought provoking post.
(2)
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
So... when will they learn that passing laws is insufficient when enforcement of existing laws is non-existant?
Feeling good is not enough.
Feeling good is not enough.
(0)
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
Capt Gregory Prickett is it your mission in life to p--s me off. I do not chime in on your athesist @!?@!! Why do feel it necessary to chime in, to me to disrespect my belief? I respect the athesist right to that belief to avoid any athesist posts. I ignore you, why don't you ignore me? But I will tell you what, I will pray for you right now, in Jesus' name. "Heavenly Father in Jesus' Name, this your creation, Capt Gregory Prickett, I present to his heart. Oh Jehovah God, the one and true God, touch his heart to see things he does not believe. Grant him a testimony that YOU live, and BE all things. Touch him that he will know the salvation if Jesus Christ is real. In His Name I oray. Amen. Capt Gregory Prickett blessings to you and all that is important to you.
(0)
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
Capt Gregory Prickett since secularism has always been, then why was HIS NAME and essence necessary to be banished in the first place? Why does your secular literature record founding leaders and early leaders using God as premise and recognition? This is retorical, don't respond. Everytime you chime in on me, I am going to send you a written prayer. Are you trying to overwhelm my right to free speech by sending bullying responses when I have a right to articulate towards fellow believers. Are you verbally assaulting me by stepping over the proverbial line in the Sand that separates me from you? Are you launching a 911 on my side of the Constitution (you know flying planes onto US soil in the name of Allah and bombing the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and attempting the White House)? There are two sides to this Constitution thing comrade Capt Gregory Prickett
(0)
(0)
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
Capt Gregory Prickett secular history does document blacks being in the Klu Klux Klan (Kluxer). Crazy huh! But I'm not a Kluxer. I called you comrade as in the military and ceteran community to refrain from calling you an SOB, a suck minded c@#$?er, you know names that would put me on your harrassibg level. SO YOU HEAR AND SEE THIS, I am not stupid. I know electronic transmission law. Don't mess around and get this platform in trouble. Kluxer cones under hate groups. Now, the God I serve, I pray in HIS name for your salvation that the spirit of evil and hate that stirs you will leave your heart. In Jesus name. Is my response to you comnunicating across electronic media after I have told you you are bullying me and attacking my right to free speech and now you refer to me by a hate groups classification. That's all I have to say to YOU about THIS.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
Sgt Wayne Wood There is no way even if an amendment to repeal passed the congress that 2/3 of the states would vote for it. Further no politician in a conservative state is going to outwardly support such a thing as it would be political suicide.
I like the idea of arming some teachers. Not everyone is comfortable with firearms, and their use. The statement that it is sad that we have come to a point where arming teachers is necessary is spot on. Unfortunately, we have come to that point. So for teachers who are willing to carry a firearm, willing to train, and willing to accept the responsibilities that go with being armed, I think it is a good idea.
I don't think that airport security is anything more than window dressing. There are a lot of things they catch, but there are far too many things they miss. One miss can have catastrophic consequences. The same is true of schools. The difference being that with schools they would have to secure the outside perimeter of the school grounds in addition to securing the inside. It is just not practical to do so.
I really like the idea of not naming the attacker. Don't give them a platform. Keep their identity under wraps. Try them, keep the trial out of the limelight. If they die in the shooting, bury them in an unmarked grave. If they die in prison, or by death penalty, bury them in an unmarked grave. Let them die and be unmourned.
Two doors in every classroom just makes sense, not just for an active shooter, but anytime a need arises to quickly evacuate a classroom.
I like the idea of arming some teachers. Not everyone is comfortable with firearms, and their use. The statement that it is sad that we have come to a point where arming teachers is necessary is spot on. Unfortunately, we have come to that point. So for teachers who are willing to carry a firearm, willing to train, and willing to accept the responsibilities that go with being armed, I think it is a good idea.
I don't think that airport security is anything more than window dressing. There are a lot of things they catch, but there are far too many things they miss. One miss can have catastrophic consequences. The same is true of schools. The difference being that with schools they would have to secure the outside perimeter of the school grounds in addition to securing the inside. It is just not practical to do so.
I really like the idea of not naming the attacker. Don't give them a platform. Keep their identity under wraps. Try them, keep the trial out of the limelight. If they die in the shooting, bury them in an unmarked grave. If they die in prison, or by death penalty, bury them in an unmarked grave. Let them die and be unmourned.
Two doors in every classroom just makes sense, not just for an active shooter, but anytime a need arises to quickly evacuate a classroom.
(2)
(0)
CW3 Harvey K.
None of our rights were "granted" to us in the Constitution, nor have they been given to us by any level of government in any manner. That is the bedrock foundation of the Constitution, as was expressed in the Declaration of Independence -- "We hold these truths to be self-evident ..."
In like manner, there is no way for rights to be taken from the people by government, nor by alteration of the Constitution. That which lacks the power to give, lacks the power to take.
With the exception of Prohibition (a mistake we corrected), all amendments were an expansion of rights, or an "administrative change", such as the direct election of senators by the people instead of by the state's legislature.
In like manner, there is no way for rights to be taken from the people by government, nor by alteration of the Constitution. That which lacks the power to give, lacks the power to take.
With the exception of Prohibition (a mistake we corrected), all amendments were an expansion of rights, or an "administrative change", such as the direct election of senators by the people instead of by the state's legislature.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
The first logical step is to repeal the "Gun Free School Zone Act".
Frankly, the only logical purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers.
It was apparently intended originally as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders (even off-duty cops) making them criminals if armed within 1.000 feet of a school zone.
But repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands.
They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners, or “the NRA” for the slaughter of our children.that is all their doing.
Frankly, the only logical purpose I can see in the "Gun Free School Zone Act" (GFSZA) is to assure the safety of a homicidal maniac for the period of time he spends slaughtering children and teachers.
It was apparently intended originally as a law to harass lawful gun owners and CCW holders (even off-duty cops) making them criminals if armed within 1.000 feet of a school zone.
But repeated attacks and mass-murders of our children reveal the (at best) "unintended consequences" of that harassment law.
The fact that the gun-grabbers use these attacks to fuel their demagoguery is a clear indication that they now fully accept that slaughter of the innocents, caused by their "gun owner harassment law", even if it was not part of their plan from the start.
The slaughter of those children is only a tool for them to advance their agenda. They try to blame "lax gun laws", "assault weapons", "the NRA", for the blood that is on their hands.
They refuse to consider the repeal of that GFSZA, because it serves their purpose so well. They implicitly accept any "unintended consequence" of the perverse and deadly GFSZA they pushed through under the guise of "school safety", and instead exploit the death and horror they have caused,while blaming innocent gun-owners, or “the NRA” for the slaughter of our children.that is all their doing.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google