Posted on Feb 13, 2018
second-u-s-judge-blocks-trump-administration-from-ending-daca-program-idUSKCN1FX2TJ
4.67K
76
49
2
2
0
Second U.S. judge blocks Trump administration from ending DACA program
[ Since DACA is an executive order, not a law, how can resc ding it be blocked by a judge? Separation of powers & all that? ]
[ Since DACA is an executive order, not a law, how can resc ding it be blocked by a judge? Separation of powers & all that? ]
second-u-s-judge-blocks-trump-administration-from-ending-daca-program-idUSKCN1FX2TJ
Posted from reuters.comPosted in these groups: 
ImmigrationU.S. District Court
Office of the President (POTUS)
Constitution
Law
ImmigrationU.S. District Court Office of the President (POTUS) Constitution Law
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 7
6
6
0
The illegal EO has to be renewed every two years. From the date it was last renewed until it expires on March 5, 2018 is determined by the EO signed by Obama. Too bad he didn’t take care of this through regular order in Congress, when the Democrats had the Executive Branch and Congressional majority shows how concerned he was when it wasn’t a hot political issue. He even promised Comprehensive Immigration reform in his first year, but priorities, priorities. For eight years.
(6)
(0)
Maj John Bell
SSgt Boyd Herrst - Ultimately the EO belongs to the billet, not the body in the billet.
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
That is an interesting point, since courts are supposed to uphold the law. Judges are supposed to interpret the law. DACA was indeed, an Executive Order and NOT law.
(4)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
Capt Gregory Prickett - And as far as what MSG Joseph Cristofaro just stated is a lie?
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
Capt Gregory Prickett - Since you filed a libel case in that instance, myself and others on this venue have asked you to produce the court documents stating the outcome of that case and not just your word for it, and you still have not provided that information. So what is your point? You have failed to respond in kind.
Also you are not addressing the immediately previous statement by MSG Joseph Cristofaro as I asked, and deflecting from the point.
It has been shown that you are a cyber-stalker, and that is the root cause of you being dismissed from your position as a police officer at UT Dallas; that is a bit difficult to dispute. You did file a libel case against the individual that accused you of that, however you have not proven by documented court documents that you were exonerated.
Also you are not addressing the immediately previous statement by MSG Joseph Cristofaro as I asked, and deflecting from the point.
It has been shown that you are a cyber-stalker, and that is the root cause of you being dismissed from your position as a police officer at UT Dallas; that is a bit difficult to dispute. You did file a libel case against the individual that accused you of that, however you have not proven by documented court documents that you were exonerated.
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
Capt Gregory Prickett - Really, Go ahead and file your lawsuit. You have threatened this before and did not follow through.
However, from my summation of what was published in the North Texas Daily, you were not very successful in the immediate aftermath and I do not need to retract my statement since it is based on publicly available information that has not been retracted or disputed with publicly available material. So go ahead and threaten, but if so rebut it with something other than you questionable word.
And please go back and read my earlier statements and dispute what I have just stated.
What were the results of your appeal? And what were the results of the libel case?
Support with appropriate documentation. But do not threaten me again unless you plan on following through with it.
I am sure from your previous comments about MSG Joseph Cristofaro that you have also made the same threats to him and have not followed through there either.
https://www.ntdaily.com/51104/
However, from my summation of what was published in the North Texas Daily, you were not very successful in the immediate aftermath and I do not need to retract my statement since it is based on publicly available information that has not been retracted or disputed with publicly available material. So go ahead and threaten, but if so rebut it with something other than you questionable word.
And please go back and read my earlier statements and dispute what I have just stated.
What were the results of your appeal? And what were the results of the libel case?
Support with appropriate documentation. But do not threaten me again unless you plan on following through with it.
I am sure from your previous comments about MSG Joseph Cristofaro that you have also made the same threats to him and have not followed through there either.
https://www.ntdaily.com/51104/
UNT cop fired after blogging from work
By Josh Pherigo / Managing Editor -A veteran UNT police officer has filed an appeal after he was fired in December on accusations that he violated the university’s computer-use policy.UNT Dallas Police Coordinator Gregory J. Prickett, a 20-year member of the department, was placed on admini
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
MSG Joseph Cristofaro - I agree. I have also had these run in's with him in the past over the same issues. And like I stated, I know all about his activities to include a number of aliases that he has used in the past. He has also threatened me a number of times for stating factual information that was published in public newspapers. I am also aware and cognizant of his network of affiliates that also do the same thing in concert with each other.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
It is an EO which expires, the court can't change that, only a new EO can extend it. Trump isn't the one ending DACA, Obama set up the end of DACA.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google