Schools are struggling to meet TA rules, but DoD isn’t punishing them. Here’s why.

One part that I have concern with is: "low-quality but over-priced education." As well as reference to job placement after graduation. How do they determine whether the education is adequately priced based on the quality? Is the revival accreditation not enough, or are they possibly talking about nationally accredited schools?

Assuming that a school is not blatantly lying or stretching statistics, when it comes to job placement after graduation, how much can a non-historic and non-prestigious school do to effect this area? If certain schools have a name brand monopoly on job placement in certain fields, does that mean other schools shouldn't try to break into the market? Their graduates will definitely suffer low rates of success due to employer preferences of name brand schools over newer and less traditional ones. Don't get me wrong, it's understandable. If we get consistent positive results, we tend to keep using that method rather than assume risk trying something new.